|
10:30
12:00
|
-
Ryoichi Shiroki Japan
Speaker
Surgical Robot-System hinotori in Urological Surgery: Clinical Applications and Future PotentialThe hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has been designed to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside. Equipped with four 8-axis robotic arms, providing smooth, highly articulated movements that mimic the human hand. In addition, docking-free design allows for a wide operative field around trocars, ensuring smooth workflows for surgeons and assistants. As a made-in-Japan system, it offers high adaptability to local clinical needs and faster implementation of user feedback.
Since the first launch, more 90 systems have been installed for the clinical use, not only inside Japan but foreign countries such as Singapore and Malaysia. The first one was performed in December 2020 on prostatectomy. Since then, more than 100,000 cases performed, including urology GI surgery, gynecology and thoracic fields. In urological surgery, robot-assisted surgery has been widely and promptly accepted as a standard approach for the majority of major surgeries, including robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), partial nephrectomy (RAPN), radical nephrectomy (RARN), radical nephroureterectomy (RANU), and radical cystectomy (RARC), and has generally shown findings superior to those of conventional open and laparoscopic surgeries
In conclusion, hinotori is a cutting-edge Japanese surgical robot already in use at many medical institutions. With strong performance across various surgical specialties and growing insurance coverage, it is expected to benefit even more patients as its technology continues to evolve and its global presence expands.Comparison of Various Current Surgical Robotic Systems - Nuances, Advantages, & DrawbacksIn the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical care in the majority of surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. We, Fujita, installed the four different kinds of robotic platform for clinical usage such as, daVinci Xi, SP, hinotori and Hugo. In this study, we want to analyze the perioperative outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and characterize the differences between four platforms.
hinotori : The hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has a compact operation arm with eight axes of motion, one more than the DaVinci, leading to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside.
DaVinci SP : The characteristic of the SP system can operate one 3D flexible camera and three forceps through a single port, and various surgical access is possible without the external interference of the arms. The various complicated procedures have been feasible such as NOTES or transoral surgery through the narrow space without the large wound, and retroperitoneal approach like the prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. SP system is expected to contribute to develop the high quality surgery with minimal invasiveness.
Hugo : Hugo system (Medtronic) consists of an open-site console with two arm-controllers that are operated with a grip similar to a pistol. It also has a footswitch that controls the camera, energy source, and reserve arm. The system includes four separate arm carts, each with six joints to increase the range of motion. Additionally, it uses specific 3D glasses for head tracking technology.
Despite a small case series, there seemed to need learning-curve to get familiar with systems in setting-up and surgical procedures in introductory-phase. However, all the surgical procedures were efficaciously and safely performed, resulting in the achievement of favorable perioperative outcomes surgically as well as oncologically.
In conclusion, these new robots will lead to competition and reduce the costs of RAS and will contribute to an increase in use. Robotic-assisted surgery will become more common than laparoscopic surgery especially in the field of urology.
-
Michael WongSingapore
Moderator
Introduction to Asia School of UrologyAsian School of Urology 2022-2026 – New initiatives
Dr Michael YC Wong
Principal Director of ASU 2022-2026
President Endourological Society and WCET 2026
Introduction
Asian School of Urology (ASU) officially started in 1999 with the appointment of her first director Prof Pichai Bunyaratavej from Thailand (1999-2002) Subsequent directors were Dato Dr Rohan Malek from Malaysia (2002-2006) Prof Foo Keong Tatt from Singapore (2006-2010) Prof Rainy Umbas from Indonesia (2010-2014 ) and Prof Shin Egawa from Japan ( 2014-2022 ).
One of the highlights of the ASU in the early days were the organization of several workshops outside of UAA congress by three active sub-specialty sections of UAA namely Asian society of Endourology (over 16 workshops held from 1998-2008), Asian Society of Female Urology and Asia-Pacific society of Uro-Oncology. Other subspecialty sections were subsequently introduced and have matured very well including Asian Society of UTI and STI, Asian-Pacific Society of Andrological and Reconstructive Urology Surgeons.
In the last 8 years, ASU has seen tremendous growth under the steady leadership of Prof Shin Egawa with introduction of UAA lecturers at national Meetings and further maturation of the subspecialty sections of UAA e.g., Conversion of Asian society of endourology to Asian Robotic Urological Society to reflect the growth and development of UAA. During the past 8 years, ASU-South-East Asia section has also managed to organize 15 physical workshops and 4 webinars outside of UAA congress.
The Growth Trajectory for the next 4 years 2022-2026
There are many areas where ASU can grow further. Bearing in mind our limited resources and our excellent relationships with the world urological leaders at this point in our history.
There are three areas which I will focus on. Please remember that ASU is always open to other new initiatives as we must stay relevant to our Asian urological community.
1. Lasting and strong Relationships
1.1 AUA. Over a dish of chili crab with AUA secretary general Gopal Badlani, we explored the common desire to elevate Asian Urology and strengthen UAA Family. This led to our first joint UAA-AUA residency course at UAA Singapore 2016. After successful completion, a MOU was signed at AUA 2017 with Richard Babayan, Manoj Monga, Allen Chiu and myself in attendance. The AURC at UAA Hong Kong under Prof Eddie Chan was the result of this signed MOU. We are extremely grateful for the generosity of AUA for this program. What may not be obvious is that Gopal Badlani, Manoj Monga, John Denstedt and I served as faculty and board directors at WCE. We will sign the extension MOU in 2023 for another three years.
1.2 EAU. We have a very successful UAA-EAU Youth program since UAA Thailand 2012. This has been the work of several UAA senior members. From 2023, we are exploring joint webinars with EAU to build on this relationship.
1.3 SIU and WCE. We will further explore options based on available resources and manpower. Joint Webinar are planned for early 2026
2. Education Platform for Asian Urology Residents
From 2023, we will continue to grow our relationship with BJUI. BJUI has developed a world class online learning platform with tremendous investments since 2013. This platform is called BJUI Knowledge. ASU will reach out to all Asian residents via their national urological association president and secretary to encourage every resident to sign up for a free access to more than 420 interactive 30-minute modules covering the whole urology syllabus suitable for learning, exit exams and recertification exams. I am personally involved in developing all modules under Endourology and urolithiasis Section and have been associate editor since May 2013. The modest aim is for at least 10 residents per country to sign up by UAA 2023. We will report progress at each UAA council meeting. Pls see attached information and if there are any questions pls email me personally at email@drmichaelwong.com
3. Re-Strategize Training cum fellowship sites for ASU.
3.1 In the past we have always talked about the possibility about training sites for UAA and ASU. It has always been a difficult task due to financial and multiple logistics issues.
3.2 What can we do that is possible? Let us consider two options in the next 4 years.
3.3 For the last 6 years a group of Asian urologists started AUGTEG to design and provide two-day surgical training which includes lectures as well as dry and wet lab to develop surgical skills. AUSTEG has direct access to physical training centres in Thailand, South Korea, and China.
ASU will work with AUGTEC to pool resources since we are the same people working on both sides e.g., Anthony Ng (chairman of AUSTEG) Michael Wong (vice chairman) Eddie Chan (treasurer). AUGTEG is registered in HK.
3.4 The second option is to recognise elected university or training Asian centres to allow an attachment for young urologist post residency in a flexible format. ASU will recognise officially these sites as endorsed by UAA. At UAA 2025 , several potential ASU/UAA fellowship sites directors will be presenting their programmes to kickstart this initiative
4. In conclusion, ASU will continue to grow and serve the Asian Urological Community. The above initiatives are only the beginning of a next chapter. Can you contribute your ideas and current available resources for this purpose? If you can, Pls email me personally at email@drmichaelwong.com
Which Position is the Best for PCNL in 2025?With tremendous advances in both technique and technology , the MIS approach to staghorn calculi has evolved significantly over the last 30 years.
It is timely to review all the landmark articles on patient positioning as this ultimately determines renal access which in turn plays a major role in stone free rates. We will gain much insight as we debate and attempt to answer the question of which position is best in 2026!
Ketan BadaniUnited States
Speaker
Expanding horizons: SP for complex RAPNThe Future of Urological Robotic SurgerySingle-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple or Large Renal TumorsHow to Standardize Training by AI-Learning from The Best Practice of Urological Robotic SurgerySP Partial Nephrectomy
-
Rajeev KumarIndia
Moderator
Troubleshooting in Endoscopic Stone Surgery: How to Handle Unexpected Challenges in RIRS and ECIRSProstate Cancer Nomograms and Their Application in Asian MenNomograms help to predict outcomes in individual patients rather than whole populations and are an important part of evaluation and treatment decision making. Various nomograms have been developed in malignancies to predict and prognosticate clinical outcomes such as severity of disease, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. In prostate cancer, nomograms were developed for determining need for biopsy, disease course, need for adjuvant therapy, and outcomes.
Most of these predictive nomograms were based on Caucasian populations. Prostate cancer is significantly affected by race, and Asian men have a significantly different racial and genetic susceptibility compared to Caucasians, raising the concern about the generalizability of these nomograms.
There are very few studies that have evaluated the applicability and validity of the existing nomograms in in Asian men. Most have found significant differences in the performance in this population. Thus, relying on such nomograms for treating Asian men may not be appropriate and collaborative efforts are required within Asian countries to develop locally relevant nomograms.What Is Critical Appraisal?Critical appraisal is the process of systematically evaluating research studies to assess their validity, relevance, and trustworthiness. The goal is to determine whether a study’s results are credible and useful for clinical decision-making, research, or policy. This has become increasingly important as there has been a massive increase in the number of scientific journals and not all published research is of equal quality. Critical appraisal helps healthcare professionals avoid being misled by poor-quality studies, make evidence-based decisions and improve patient outcomes.
The key purposes are to assess validity of the study and its results and determine applicability to the specific population. It involves assessing the study design, methodological quality, completeness of reporting, potential sources of bias and potential for misconduct.
There are number of reporting guidelines that can be used for performing critical appraisal. Additionally, being aware of essential reporting standards and common problems with studies can help readers make informed decisions.Scientific Misconduct and PitfallsNo abstractExample of the “Ideal” AbstractNo Abstract
Simone CrivellaroUnited States
Speaker
Single-Port vs. Multi-Port Robotic Prostatectomy: Balancing Innovation, Precision, and OutcomesThe Application & Limitation of Urological SP SurgerySingle Port Retroperitoneal Partial NephrectomySingle Port Prostate Surgery
-
Masatoshi EtoJapan
Speaker
Current Status & Future Perspective of Surgical Navigation in Robotic SurgeryRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard treatment for small renal cancer, however, the number of reports on the development of the image supported system and its effectiveness is small. The key point in the procedure of RAPN is to reliably identify renal artery in a space with few landmarks and to resect a tumor. To performe RAPN safely and reliably, we have already developed a surgical navigation specialized for RAPN, and published its usefulness in daVinci surgical systems. In this lecture, I would like to talk our recent projects updating our current navigation system. The first project focuses on 3D navigation using real-time forceps tracking. The second project is to develop an AI-based autonomous registration method for surgical navigation in RAPN. I hope that these 2 projects will further enhance the usefulness of our navigation system in RAPN.
-
Chi-Fai NgHong Kong, China
Speaker
Novel Robotic Surgery PlatformsOver the past decades, robotic surgery has become an essential approach in urological care. The recent blooming of different robotic platforms, in particular in Asian countries, has helped popularize robotic surgery in less developed countries. The introduction of robotic technology in endoluminal surgery has also helped to open up opportunities to further improve endourology. In the future, the incorporation of AI in robotic systems will help upgrade the standard of care in urology.
-
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall
|
|
13:30
15:00
|
-
John DavisUnited States
Speaker
Open Surgery Training: Is It Necessary in the Era of Robotics?Open surgery training in the era of robotics may or may not be a training environment that urology has control of, given worldwide access to robotic or at least laparoscopic techniques and strong patient preference. There may be some applications where a given experienced urologist can prefer open over minimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as radical cystectomy, or indications possibly outside of MIS feasibility such as large renal tumors with caval thrombus. Specific to training and expertise, there are 3 principle features of surgical skills desired: 1) knowing ideal exposure, 2) recognition of surgical planes, and 3) knowing anatomy before it can be seen. Although some trainees may only see MIS for certain indications, open surgery may expedite the process. There are no human studies identified on the topic, but a skills lab study was instructive (Farah, J Surgical Education 2023) showing that interns with open and MIS training performed higher comparing pre-intern to post intern bootcamp skills. The benefits of a solid training pathway including open experience are to move trainees towards the faster-to-progress part of the learning curve such that the attending can offer a safe training environment while moving the case along efficiently.The Future of Surgical Skills Evaluation: What Is on Your Wish List?Surgical skills training vary significantly by region with some systems putting trainees on a timed set of years, while others apprentice trainees until meeting a threshold for skills. Early training assessments were basic timed events with qualitative scores (subject to strong attending selection for success). Trainees should experience and/or study the key pitfalls to avoid and performance goals. Surgical simulation can be highly useful, but tend to improve only certain skills and not full case needs. Updated simulation moves from digital to hands on surgical models and may move the needle towards human experience. Training can be augmented with descriptors of surgical gestures and measuring which ones are most effective. The experience for the trainee is often depicted as an "autonomy gap" whereby the training desires to have case control, possibly before they are ready. Progression can be measured by descriptors of performance from assistance through full performance without coaching. The next frontier will be artificial intelligence guided measurement where specific performances can be characterized and diagnosed for success. My ultimate wishlist would be for methods to correlate skills to outcomes, optimized curricula, and a specific pathway to correct underperformance.Tips and Tricks in Challenging Cases of Robotic Radical ProstatectomyThere are many specific challenges with robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) that can be described and illustrated--the most 5 common are 1) difficulty access, 2) obesity, 3) pubic arch interference, 4) anatomic challenges, and 5) reconstruction challenges. In this video sample, we demonstrate 2 challenges: obesity requiring a pelvic lymph node dissection and significant pelvic de-fatting to identify the proper surgical landmarks. Next a massive sized prostate that has had a partial transurethral resection--together presenting challenges with landmarks, a difficult bladder neck to diagnose, and final reconstruction challenges.
-
Vipul R. PatelUnited States
Speaker
Lessons from 20,000 Robotic Prostatectomies: A Global Expert’s PerspectiveTechnical Considerations for Large Prostates over 100gmsTelesurgery: The Future of Surgery
-
Simone CrivellaroUnited States
Speaker
Single-Port vs. Multi-Port Robotic Prostatectomy: Balancing Innovation, Precision, and OutcomesThe Application & Limitation of Urological SP SurgerySingle Port Retroperitoneal Partial NephrectomySingle Port Prostate Surgery
-
Ketan BadaniUnited States
Speaker
Expanding horizons: SP for complex RAPNThe Future of Urological Robotic SurgerySingle-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple or Large Renal TumorsHow to Standardize Training by AI-Learning from The Best Practice of Urological Robotic SurgerySP Partial Nephrectomy
-
Wenjie ZhongAustralia
Speaker
Emergency Undocking in Robotic Urology Surgery - Preparedness, Protocols, and PracticeIntroduction:
Robotic surgery has revolutionized urologic procedures, offering precision and minimally invasive benefits. However, the complexity of the robotic interface introduces the rare but potentially catastrophic need for emergency undocking - a rapid disengagement of the robotic system in response to patient or technical emergencies.
Objective:
To review the current best practices, protocols, and preparedness strategies for emergency undocking during robotic urologic surgery, with a focus on multidisciplinary coordination, training, and outcome optimization.
Methods:
A structured review of the literature was conducted, including case reports, institutional protocols, and guideline recommendations from leading urological societies (AUA, EAU). In addition, procedural algorithms and simulation-based training approaches were analyzed to assess their impact on team performance and patient safety.
Results:
Emergency undocking occurs in fewer than 0.1% of robotic cases but is associated with high morbidity if delays occur. Key indications include sudden hemodynamic collapse, cardiac arrest, airway compromise, and robotic system malfunction. Simulation training has been shown to improve undocking times by up to 35%. Effective response hinges on predefined roles, verbal cues, and practiced protocols. Institutions with regular team drills report faster response times and better outcomes in high-acuity scenarios.
Conclusion:
Although infrequent, emergency undocking represents a critical moment in robotic surgery that demands rapid, coordinated team action. Implementing standardized protocols, reinforcing multidisciplinary simulations, and fostering a culture of readiness can significantly improve patient safety and surgical outcomes.
-
Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan
Speaker
ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends,
It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS).
This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation.
Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction
Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration.
Results
Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups.
Conclusions
Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background:
Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn.
Material and Methods:
We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months.
Results:
The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery.
Conclusion:
We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground:
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications.
Objective:
This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques.
Methods:
We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied.
Results:
Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of
prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible.
Conclusion:
The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency.
Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques.
Significance:
This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate
cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall
|
|
15:30
17:00
|
-
Siros JitpraphaiThailand
Speaker
RCC and IVC ThrombectomyRCC and IVC thrombus
Siros Jitpraphai
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, THAILAND
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus represents a complex surgical challenge, with an incidence of venous involvement in 4-10% of cases. This case report demonstrates the successful surgical management of a 58-year-old female patient with a large left-sided renal mass and IVC thrombus. The patient presented with gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a 10 cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma (Fuhrman nuclear grade 3) extending into the renal vein and IVC. Recognizing the complexity of the case, a multidisciplinary approach was employed, involving urological and hepatobiliary surgical teams. The comprehensive treatment strategy included an open radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. The surgical technique was meticulously planned and executed, with several key considerations. Preoperative imaging was crucial in determining the exact level of thrombus, allowing for precise surgical planning. The procedure emphasized careful vascular control and en-bloc tumor removal, with intraoperative ultrasound used to ensure accurate thrombus localization. Surgical teams worked collaboratively to minimize potential complications and maximize surgical success. Operatively, the procedure was substantial, with an estimated blood loss of 900 mL and a total operative time of 5 hours. The patient required two days of postoperative intensive care and was discharged from the hospital seven days after the surgery. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with no lymph node metastasis detected and positive tumor thrombus. Importantly, surgical margins were found to be free of tumor.
Follow-up evaluations have been encouraging, with no signs of tumor recurrence observed during regular intervals. This case illustrates the critical importance of a systematic surgical approach, precise technical execution, and comprehensive multidisciplinary management in successfully treating RCC with IVC thrombus. It provides valuable insights into the complex surgical management of this challenging condition, potentially offering guidance for similar cases in the future.
Keyword: RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma), IVC Thrombus, Thrombectomy, Surgical Technique, Multidisciplinary Management
Highlight: RCC with IVC thrombus is a complex surgical challenge affecting 4-10% of cases. Successful management requires meticulous preoperative imaging, multidisciplinary team approach, and precise surgical technique. With careful planning and execution, 45-70% of patients can be cured through radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy.
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in Complex and Difficult Tumor Location
-
Surya Prakash VaddiIndia
Speaker
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Immune TherapyRobotic Partial Nephrectomy in Tumors with High Renal Score
-
John YuenSingapore
Moderator
Technical Pearls: Total Extraperitoneal TechniquePractice-Changing Development in RaLRP
Andrew Kennedy SmithNew Zealand
Speaker
Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial NephrectomyNephron preservation with complete tumour excision and without complications remain the goals of surgery for early-stage kidney tumours. This surgery remains technically challenging using a minimally invasive platform, and there remain variations of technique. We present what is now an established approach within our centre, but has been enhanced by progressive improvements in the specific surgical instrumentation. The technique is achievable in a smaller centre with lower surgical volumes. We perform a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents, reliably achieving the stated goals of this surgery.
Ischaemia and delayed complications are minimised by avoiding renorrhaphy and vascular clamping during dissection.Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar TumorsOur technique for hilar tumours remains similar to that for peripheral tumours, again using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents. Waterjet may be safely used directly on major vessels and collecting system structures, and directly on the tumour capsule, to perform either conventional partial nephrectomy with parenchymal margin or tumour enucleation. With hilar dissection, it is possible to visualise and control arterial supply directly to the tumour, reducing the potential for blood loss.
The stated goals of this surgery are achieved. The technique which avoids renorrhaphy is particularly relevant in hilar tumours where renorrhaphy may not be technically achievable.
-
Andrew Kennedy SmithNew Zealand
Speaker
Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial NephrectomyNephron preservation with complete tumour excision and without complications remain the goals of surgery for early-stage kidney tumours. This surgery remains technically challenging using a minimally invasive platform, and there remain variations of technique. We present what is now an established approach within our centre, but has been enhanced by progressive improvements in the specific surgical instrumentation. The technique is achievable in a smaller centre with lower surgical volumes. We perform a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents, reliably achieving the stated goals of this surgery.
Ischaemia and delayed complications are minimised by avoiding renorrhaphy and vascular clamping during dissection.Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar TumorsOur technique for hilar tumours remains similar to that for peripheral tumours, again using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents. Waterjet may be safely used directly on major vessels and collecting system structures, and directly on the tumour capsule, to perform either conventional partial nephrectomy with parenchymal margin or tumour enucleation. With hilar dissection, it is possible to visualise and control arterial supply directly to the tumour, reducing the potential for blood loss.
The stated goals of this surgery are achieved. The technique which avoids renorrhaphy is particularly relevant in hilar tumours where renorrhaphy may not be technically achievable.
-
Arnulf StenzlGermany
Speaker
EAU Lecture: AI to Support Informed Decision Making (INSIDE) for Improved Literature Analysis in Oncology.Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Neobladder Formation
-
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall
|
Management of Post-Prostatectomy Incontinence
-
Hann-Chorng KuoTaiwan
Moderator
ACU Lecture: Videourodynamic Study for Precision Diagnosis and Management of Lower Urinary Tract DysfunctionVideourodynamic Study in the Precision Diagnosis and Management of Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunctions
Hann-Chorng Kuo, M.D.
Department of Urology, Hualien Tzu Chi Hospital, Buddhist Tzu Chi Medical Foundation, Tzu Chi University, Hualien, Taiwan
As a urologist, we are dealing with patients with lower urinary tract symptoms everyday. We did transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) for elderly men with bothersome lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS). We put a suburethral sling for women with stress urinary incontinence (SUI). We prescribed alpha-blocker for those who had difficulty in urination. We add antimuscarinics for patients with urgency urinary incontinence. Our seniors always told us these treatments are effective in treating patients with LUTS. However, patients still had LUTS after TURP, women still complained of urgency and dysuria after anti-incontinence surgery. Medication based on storage or emptying LUTS do not work all the time. Why? Because symptoms are not reliable, a large prostate does not indicate bladder outlet obstruction (BOO), and SUI is not solely a result of urethral incompetence. Therefore, in diagnosis and management of LUTS, we need precision medicine to direct an accurate pathophysiology of LUTS, and to guide an appropriate management based on the bladder and bladder outlet dysfunction. When we encounter patients who have LUTS refractory to the treatment based on our initial diagnosis, when we are treating patients who have complicated storage and emptying LUTS, when we are not sure patients could benefit from the invasive procedures for their LUTS, or patients who had both lower and upper urinary tract dysfunctions, videourodynamic study (VUDS) is an essential investigation for diagnosis and management of LUTS. In additional to benign prostate hyperplasia (BPH) and BOO, male patients with emptying LUTS might result from detrusor underactivity (DU), bladder neck dysfunction (BND), urethral sphincter dysfunction, or a hypersensitive bladder, which is not related with the prostate. Patients with BPH and LUTS might have latent neurogenic lesion, such as minor stroke, Parkinson's disease, or early dementia, causing LUTS. TURP without known the neurological disease might exacerbate LUTS after surgery. Mixed SUI comprises intrinsic sphincter deficiency (ISD) and detrusor overactivity (DO). The overactive bladder (OAB) symptoms may also result from an incompetent bladder outlet. Without comprehensive VUDS, we might cure the SUI, but OAB remains after placing a mid-urethral sling. Bladder pain is the cardinal symptoms of interstitial cystitis. However, bladder pain perceived by the patient might also originate from BOO or pelvic floor fascitis. VUDS can help in discrimination. DU and low compliant bladder and ISD could result in complicated storage and emptying LUTS. Large post-void residual (PVR) should alert us to investigate whether it is originated from low compliance or ISD. Dysfunctional voiding (DV) and BND in women with emptying LUTS. OAB symptoms are not always coming from the DO. BOO such as BND, DV, or urethral stricture might exist in men and women without voiding symptoms. Urinary difficulty in women is usually a result from low detrusor contractility, due to DU, or through inhibitory effect from a poorly relaxed pelvic floor or urethral sphincter. A simple bladder neck incision can effectively restore spontaneous voiding in men or women with dysuria due to DU or BND. However, a tight BN is necessary to predict a successful treatment outcome. Patients with central nervous system (CNS) disorders or spinal cord injury usually have complicated LUTD, including DO, BND, DV, detrusor sphincter dyssynergia (DSD), and vesicoureteral reflux (VUR). Management of LUTS in CNS disorders or SCI patients should know the current bladder and bladder outlet dysfunctions. Pediatric incontinence, children with myelomeningocele, DV, or recurrent urinary tract infection are complicated and need precision diagnosis before treatment. Especially when surgery is planned. Lower urinary tract dysfunctions is a dynamic condition. The bladder and bladder outlet dysfunction might change with time. Although VUDS is considered as an invasive investigation with radiation exposure, the advantages in accurate diagnosis and guiding management outweigh these disadvantages.
-
Lewis ChanAustralia
Speaker
Imaging of Male Pelvic Floor Structure and the Natural Course of Pelvic Floor Remodeling after ProstatectomyLower urinary tract symptoms and incontinence are common issues in the ageing population. It is well recognised that radical prostatectomy can have significant impact on urinary continence and quality of life in men who have undergone surgery for prostate cancer. The causes of post prostatectomy incontinence can be multifactorial and urodynamic studies in men prior to prostatectomy have shown a high prevalence of bladder dysfunction. This presentation covers the role of dynamic ultrasound in studying the male pelvic floor and the changes observed following prostatectomy.
-
Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan
Speaker
ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends,
It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS).
This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation.
Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction
Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration.
Results
Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups.
Conclusions
Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background:
Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn.
Material and Methods:
We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months.
Results:
The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery.
Conclusion:
We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground:
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications.
Objective:
This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques.
Methods:
We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied.
Results:
Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of
prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible.
Conclusion:
The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency.
Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques.
Significance:
This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate
cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
-
Chung-Cheng WangTaiwan
Speaker
Ureteral Stent and SelectionUreteral stents are widely used in urology for the management of obstructive uropathies, including urologic or non-urologic malignancy, radiation therapy, ureteral calculus, infection, surgical or nonsurgical trauma, or congenital factors. An untreated ureteral obstruction could result in urinary tract infection, abdominal or flank pain, and a deterioration of renal function. Despite their widespread utility, the selection of an appropriate ureteral stent remains a complex clinical decision involving multiple variables including patient-specific factors, disease pathology, duration of stenting, and the desired balance between drainage efficacy and patient comfort.
Advancements in stent technology have led to the development of a variety of stent types, distinguished by their material composition (e.g., polyurethane, silicone, and hydrophilic-coated polymers), design features (e.g., double-J, multi-length, tail stents), drug-eluting capabilities, reinforced metallic stent, and biodegradable stents. Each design aims to optimize certain aspects of performance such as resistance to encrustation, migration, infection, and stent-related symptoms.
Key considerations in stent selection include indwelling time, risk of infection or encrustation, patient anatomy, and comorbidities or prior urologic surgery. For short-term use, polyurethane or co-polymer stents are often preferred due to their balance of flexibility and cost-effectiveness. In contrast, silicone stents may be more appropriate for long-term indwelling due to their superior biocompatibility and reduced encrustation rates. Drug-eluting stents are emerging as promising options in cases of recurrent infection or tumor-associated obstruction. Softer materials, tapered tips, and biodegradable stents aim to reduce stent-related lower urinary tract symptoms.
Recently, we reported the efficacy and safety of Allium metallic ureteral stents in treating 13 patients with refractory ureteral strictures. The median (IQR) age of the patients was 63 (46–76) years. The median (IQR) follow-up was 15 (13.5–21) months. Treatment success and improvement were noted in 9 (69.2%) and 3 (23.1%) patients, respectively. Compared to the preoperative levels, the median (IQR) serum creatinine levels were significantly improved at 3 months after the operation [1.6 (1.25–2.85) vs. 1.2 (1.05–2.05), p = 0.02] and at the last visit [1.6 (1.25–2.85) vs. 1.2 (1.05–1.8), p = 0.02]. Stent migration and encrustation were noted in three (23.1%) and one (7.7%) patients, respectively. The preliminary results showed that Allium ureteral stents were safe and effective for patients with refractory ureteral strictures.
In conclusion, as technology continues to evolve, the future of ureteral stenting lies in personalized device selection based on real-time patient feedback, predictive analytics, and enhanced biomaterials. Further clinical trials and comparative studies are essential to establish evidence-based guidelines that can assist clinicians in making the most appropriate stent choices for optimal outcomes
Fixed and Adjustable Male Slings: Key Techniques for Primary Implantation and Troubleshooting in Challenging CasesMale slings have emerged as an effective surgical solution for stress urinary incontinence (SUI) following radical prostatectomy, offering an alternative to artificial urinary sphincters, particularly in patients with mild to moderate incontinence. Among the available options, fixed and adjustable male slings represent two major categories, each with distinct mechanisms of action, implantation techniques, and postoperative management considerations.
Fixed male slings work by repositioning and compressing the bulbar urethra against the pubic ramus to restore continence. These slings rely on proper patient selection—typically individuals with preserved sphincter function, low-volume leakage, and no prior pelvic radiation. Key technical considerations include precise dissection of the perineal space, adequate urethral mobilization, tension-free sling placement, and symmetric anchoring of the arms. Avoidance of over-tensioning is crucial to prevent postoperative urinary retention and perineal discomfort.
Adjustable male slings offer intraoperative or postoperative modification of sling tension to accommodate varying degrees of incontinence or suboptimal initial outcomes. These slings are particularly useful in patients with higher degrees of incontinence, previous pelvic surgery, or radiation. The implantation techniques vary but generally involve positioning a cushion or compressive element under the urethra, with external or subcutaneous access ports for saline adjustment. Mastery of device calibration, port placement, and infection prevention are critical to long-term success.
Challenging cases—such as those involving prior sling failure, prior pelvic radiation, fibrosis, or altered anatomy—require tailored strategies. In irradiated patients, tissue integrity and healing potential are compromised, often necessitating the use of adjustable systems with minimal tissue dissection or the combination of sling and bulking agents. In reoperative fields, precise identification of tissue planes and modified dissection techniques are required to prevent urethral injury or inadequate compression. Troubleshooting sling failure involves assessing continence status, sling positioning via imaging or endoscopy, and determining whether revision, adjustment, or conversion to an artificial urinary sphincter is most appropriate.
Postoperative complications including infection, urethral erosion, urinary retention, and persistent incontinence can be mitigated by proper surgical technique, patient education, and regular follow-up. Management of these complications should be proactive and individualized, balancing intervention timing with patient expectations and functional goals. In this topic, we will share our experiences to avoid these complications and increase the successful outcome.
-
-
-
TICC - 2F 201DE
|
