| Time |
Session |
|
|
08:30
10:00
|
-
John DenstedtCanada
Speaker
UAA Lecture: Innovations in Renal Stone SurgeryInnovations in Renal Stone Surgery
John Denstedt MD FRCSC
Professor of Urology
Schulich School of Medicine and Dentistry
Department of Surgery Western University
London Canada
Recent years have seen a burst of innovation in techniques for minimally invasive treatment of renal stones. Current guidelines recommend either shock wave lithotripsy or retrograde intrarenal surgery {RIRS} for stones smaller than 2cm and percutaneous renal stone removal for calculi greater than 2cm in maximal diameter. Progress in mini percutaneous stone removal {mPCNL} has facilitated expansion of antegrade techniques to stones smaller than 2cm while concurrently RIRS has seen indications expand to include larger stones than previously considered. Most randomized trials have demonstrated similar operating times, hospital stays and complications comparing RIRS and MPCNL however stone free rates are generally documented to be improved with a percutaneous approach.
Technology continues to advance and the development of flexible deflectable ureteral access sheaths with suction capability offer the possibility of improved stone free rates with RIRS while also decreasing intrarenal pressure, thus reducing the incidence of sepsis and other complications. This is challenging the traditional concept of limiting retrograde ureteroscopy to stones less than 2cm in diameter. This lecture will review the current literature on RIRS for intrarenal stones greater than 2cm, outlining expectations for the main parameters of stone free rate, complications and operating efficiency. Currently available technology and techniques will be presented allowing participants to take practical tips and tricks back to day to day urologic practice.
-
Allen W. ChiuTaiwan
Speaker
Reflecting on the Past, Shaping the Present, and Envisioning the Future of UAASince 1990, the Urological Association of Asia (UAA) has stood as a beacon of collaboration, innovation, and advancement in urology in Asia. As we reflect on its evolution, acknowledge its current impact, and envision its future, it becomes clear that the UAA has played - and will continue to play - a pivotal role in shaping urological care, education, and research throughout Asia. Reflecting on the path we’ve traveled together from 16 member associations and 1,000 individual members in 2014 to 28 member associations and over 4,500 individual members today - I see more than growth. I see unity, commitment, and a shared belief in something bigger than ourselves. A defining milestone was enrolling the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand into the UAA, further enriching our diversity and strengthening our position as a truly Asia-Pacific organization. The UAA proudly supports several journals, including the International Journal of Urology, the Indian Journal of Urology, Asian Urology, which continue to shape the academic discourse. The Asian Urological Resident Course (AURC) started in 2014, in collaboration with the American Urological Association, has become a cornerstone in nurturing clinical excellence among young urologists. The Young Leadership Forum, since 2012, developed in partnership with the European Urological Association, has fostered cross-continental mentorship and exchange. These initiatives symbolize our commitment to creating a future shared across borders. We have faced challenges under the impact of COVID-19, but conquered it with resilience and shared purpose. As healthcare needs evolve and patient expectations rise, the UAA aims to: 1. Promote regional research 2. Enhance training and education 3. Strengthen partnerships 4. Champion equity in healthcare.Complex Robotic Assisted Surgery for Urinary Fistula RepairRobotic-assisted (da Vinci) surgery is increasingly used for repair of urinary fistulas, including vesicovaginal, ureterovaginal, and enterovesical fistula. It offers a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. A case report described using the da Vinci X system to fix a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) post-hysterectomy in 105 min with no complications, a 2 day hospital stay, and excellent patient reported quality-of-life at 12 months. A literature review including 30 cases showed robotic repair of VVF reduced blood loss and shortened hospital stays by 2 days compared to open repair. A review found that robotic repair of complex urinary fistulas is technically feasible in expert hands, with good early outcomes and less morbidity than open techniques.
This presentation illustrated the key operative procedures, inlcuding ureteral catheter placement to identify the ureteral tract, anchoring stitches on opened urinary bladder wall, robotic excision of the fistula tract, layered closure of bladder wall and adjacent organ (vagina or colon), with or without Interposition of tissue flaps (e.g. omentum or peritoneal flaps) to reinforce repair. The robot provides precise and secure ileal isolation with ICG technique for the ileal isolation, and and intracorporeal anastomosis to ureter and urinary bladder are safe. Intracorporeal bowel re-anastomosis and accessibility of the da Vinci platform is becoming more popular. The isolated ileal technique provides good urinary reconstruction (e.g., Neobladder, Augmentation Cystoplasty Ileal conduit (Bricker’s procedure), Orthotopic neobladder (Studer, Hautmann, etc.) The Role of the robot to harvestest, detubularize, and fold ileum to form bladder substitute. Suture to urethra and ureters. It is often performed entirely intracorporeally with the da Vinci Xi system.
-
Arnulf StenzlGermany
Speaker
EAU Lecture: AI to Support Informed Decision Making (INSIDE) for Improved Literature Analysis in Oncology.Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Neobladder Formation
-
Stephen A. BoorjianUnited States
Speaker
AUA Lecture: 2025 Update of AUA and EAU NMIBC GuidelinesBoth the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) have developed guidelines for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). While subtle differences in several aspects of these guidelines exist which merit mentioning, both guidelines emphasis the concept of risk stratification. In particular, understanding the criteria which classifies patients with NMIBC as high risk avoids undertreatment of the patients most likely to experience disease progress. Likewise, recognizing the indications for cystectomy among high risk NMIBC patients is critical to optimize survival. Meanwhile, continued options emerge for patients classified as having BCG unresponsive NMIBC, such that knowledge of that definition as well as current management strategies for these patients facilitates contemporary practice.From Bench to Bedside - A Comprehensive Overview of Kidney CancerEvaluation of patients with a newly identified renal mass includes dedicated cross-sectional imaging for appropriate characterization. Genetic syndromes which include renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are increasingly understood, and indeed knowledge of the intracellular pathways of these conditions has facilitate rationale drug development for kidney cancer. Managing patients with a small renal mass involves a critical assessment of competing risks inherent to the tumor, the patient (underlying comorbidity status), and the proposed treatment. Renal mass biopsy may play a role in select cases for additional information/risk stratification. The safety of active surveillance is being increasingly demonstrated as longer-term follow-up matures. Meanwhile, select patients with high risk disease now have the option of adjuvant immunotherapy following surgical resection. In the setting of metastatic RCC, again risk stratification plays a critical role in the decision for – and timing of – cytoreductive nephrectomy, particularly in the contemporary era of checkpoint inhibitor therapies.Real World Experience in the Management of Upper Tract Urothelial CarcinomaThe biggest challenging in managing upper tract urothelial carcionma (UTUC) remains accurate staging of tumors at diagnosis. Given the limited ability of contemporary staging methods, clinical risk stratification models have been developed to assist in providing risk-based treatment recommendations. For example, endoscopic management (e.g., ablation) represents the recommended first line approach for patients with low risk disease. Importantly, follow-up for these patients should include endoscopic re-evaluation. The value of testing patients with UTUC for Lynch syndrome is also critical to recognize. A role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being increasing explored for patients classified with high-risk UTUC, while several options exist for adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy for patients with adverse pathology at surgical resection. Continued investigation into prevention of postoperative intravesical recurrences in patients with UTUC is warranted given the frequency of metachronous tumor development in the bladder among these patients.Updates on MIBC and Advanced Bladder Cancer: Where do We Stand in 2025While neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy has been demonstrated with randomized trial data to improve survival for patients undergoing radical cystectomy, nevertheless utilization is often restricted by misunderstandings regarding patient eligibility factors. As such, defining eligibility criteria will facilitate increased adoption. Likewise, new data indicates a role for adjust immunotherapy in select patients following surgery as well. Moreover, important recent evidence on the role of extended lymph node dissection and the opportunities for preserving sexual function after cystectomy by modifying surgical technique are critical to review in order to optimize future patient outcomes. Further, recent advancements in systemic therapy options for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have led to unprecedented survival rates.Revisit on Testicular Tumors-What we Learned from past and Prepared for the FutureGerm cell tumor (GCT) progression typically occurs in a predictable sequence of disease spread to the retroperitoneum first and then distant metastases. Understanding the role of serum tumor markers at various disease stages is critical for guideline-concordant management and to optimize patient outcomes, avoiding both undertreatment and overtreatment. For patients with seminoma, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection now represents an option for patients with low volume retroperitoneal lymph node disease, with the goal of avoiding the long-term toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. For patients with residual postchemotherapy masses in seminoma, increasing evidence suggests that PET scans should be utilized/interpreted with caution, and that in the absence of mass growth continued follow-up may be the strategy for most patients. Similarly, for patients with nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCT) and equivocal retroperitoneal lymph nodes at presentation, re-scanning after an interval of approximately 6-8 weeks may be preferable to initial treatment, as many of these nodes represent benign processes and as such will resolve. Nevertheless, postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remains a critical component of the management of patients with NSCGT and a residual mass. Risk Stratification and Contemporary Management of Biochemical RecurrenceBiochemical recurrence (BCR) has been reported in up to 35% of patients following radical prostatectomy. Understanding the natural history and clinicopathologic risk factors associated with disease progression is critical to facilitate an individualized treatment approach. Likewise, recognizing the details of treatment delivery with salvage radiotherapy is necessary to optimize outcomes. Further, as data emerge on the utilization of systemic therapy for non-metastatic BCR, being able to contextualize reported outcomes with patient age, comorbidity status, and disease risk will enhance appropriate care delivery.
-
Bannakij LojanapiwatThailand
Moderator
PSA Kinetics Following PADT in mHSPC. Is It a Real-World Tool for Predicting Oncologic Outcome?PSA Kinetics following Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy
(PADT) in mHSPC. Is it a Real-world Tool for Prediction Oncologic Outcome?
Bannakij Lojanapiwat, M.D.
Professor of Urology, Chiang Mai University, Thailand.
Of recent guidelines, upfront primary androgen deprivation monotherapy or combination therapy (PADT) is recommended for the treatment of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Limitation of real-world treatment such as culture difference, financial barrier, geographic access to treatment and high operation/ radiation risks associated with medical comorbidity led to underutilization of combination therapy as the standard guideline. Prognostic factors are important in clinical practice which can predict the clinical outcome that offer the pre-treatment counseling for patients to select the optimal treatment.
Prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels is one of the important key prognostic markers. PSA kinetics of nadir PSA level and time to nadir PSA following the treatment are the important role for progression to CRPC and oncologic outcome. Our study and the previous studies reported better oncologic outcome especially overall survival, cancer specific survival and time to developed CRPC in mHSPC patients received upfront PADT who decline PSA≥95% (deep responder), PSA nadir ≤ 0.2 ng/ml (low PSA nadir level), time to PSA nadir ≥ 6 month and PSA decline velocity <11 ng/ml/month.
PSA Kinetics following Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy (PADT) is one of a real-world tool for prediction oncologic outcome in the treatment of mHSPC.
David PensonUnited States
Speaker
Comparison of Various Treatment Options for Localized Prostate CancerThere are numerous therapeutic strategies used to treat localized prostate cancer, each with unique advantages and disadvantages. Furthermore, prostate cancer itself is heterogeneous with some tumors being indolent and others being more aggressive. We will from the presentation by looking at outcomes separately in patients with favorable prognosis and those with unfavorable prognosis, based upon baseline clinical characteristics. We will first compare cancer control and mortality outcomes amongst the various options. We will then present data on patient-reported outcomes. At the conclusion of the presentation, attendees will have a better understanding of outcomes following treatment for localized prostate cancer and will be better prepared to counsel patients newly diagnosed with this common malignancy.Updates on Combination Therapy for Advanced Prostate CancerOver the past decade, there are have been significant advances in the treatment of metastatic prostate cancer. Randomized clinical trial data have demonstrated that combination therapies are superior to monotherapy in terms of cancer control and survival. Various treatment options will be discussed for metastatic castrate-sensitive and -resistant prostate cancer. These will be compared in terms of efficacy and side effect profiles to aid in treatment selection in this The Startup of An Academic Urologist - How to Build up Your Team in Clinical ResearchMany young academic urologists wish to perform clinical research at their institution. Often, however, this is challenging due to lack of resources or time. In this presentation, we will discuss how to build a clinical research program, including identifying what types of individuals need to be part of the team and what sort of resources are required for success. While American examples will often be used, information from this presentation will still be applicable globally.A Programmatic Approach to Prostate Cancer ScreeningProstate cancer screening has advanced beyond annual PSA testing. We now have numerous tools available to aid in identifying men at risk for harboring clinically significant prostate cancer, including MRI and various novel biomarkers. In this presentation, we will review these modalities and lay out a systematic approach to screening in 2025.
-
Declan MurphyAustralia
Speaker
PSMA PET Scan in Diagnosing Early/Advanced Localized Prostate Cancer Especially Comparing Various Radioactive Tracers
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall
|
|
10:30
12:00
|
-
John DavisUnited States
Speaker
Open Surgery Training: Is It Necessary in the Era of Robotics?Open surgery training in the era of robotics may or may not be a training environment that urology has control of, given worldwide access to robotic or at least laparoscopic techniques and strong patient preference. There may be some applications where a given experienced urologist can prefer open over minimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as radical cystectomy, or indications possibly outside of MIS feasibility such as large renal tumors with caval thrombus. Specific to training and expertise, there are 3 principle features of surgical skills desired: 1) knowing ideal exposure, 2) recognition of surgical planes, and 3) knowing anatomy before it can be seen. Although some trainees may only see MIS for certain indications, open surgery may expedite the process. There are no human studies identified on the topic, but a skills lab study was instructive (Farah, J Surgical Education 2023) showing that interns with open and MIS training performed higher comparing pre-intern to post intern bootcamp skills. The benefits of a solid training pathway including open experience are to move trainees towards the faster-to-progress part of the learning curve such that the attending can offer a safe training environment while moving the case along efficiently.The Future of Surgical Skills Evaluation: What Is on Your Wish List?Surgical skills training vary significantly by region with some systems putting trainees on a timed set of years, while others apprentice trainees until meeting a threshold for skills. Early training assessments were basic timed events with qualitative scores (subject to strong attending selection for success). Trainees should experience and/or study the key pitfalls to avoid and performance goals. Surgical simulation can be highly useful, but tend to improve only certain skills and not full case needs. Updated simulation moves from digital to hands on surgical models and may move the needle towards human experience. Training can be augmented with descriptors of surgical gestures and measuring which ones are most effective. The experience for the trainee is often depicted as an "autonomy gap" whereby the training desires to have case control, possibly before they are ready. Progression can be measured by descriptors of performance from assistance through full performance without coaching. The next frontier will be artificial intelligence guided measurement where specific performances can be characterized and diagnosed for success. My ultimate wishlist would be for methods to correlate skills to outcomes, optimized curricula, and a specific pathway to correct underperformance.Tips and Tricks in Challenging Cases of Robotic Radical ProstatectomyThere are many specific challenges with robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) that can be described and illustrated--the most 5 common are 1) difficulty access, 2) obesity, 3) pubic arch interference, 4) anatomic challenges, and 5) reconstruction challenges. In this video sample, we demonstrate 2 challenges: obesity requiring a pelvic lymph node dissection and significant pelvic de-fatting to identify the proper surgical landmarks. Next a massive sized prostate that has had a partial transurethral resection--together presenting challenges with landmarks, a difficult bladder neck to diagnose, and final reconstruction challenges.
-
Véronique PhéFrance
Speaker
New Artificial Urinary SphinterStress urinary incontinence remains a major quality-of-life concern, particularly following pelvic surgery. Despite being the gold standard, the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) presents significant limitations, including mechanical failure, urethral atrophy, and challenges for elderly or disabled patients. Recent innovations in AUS design now incorporate mechatronics, remote control, adaptive pressure systems, and miniaturized components aimed at improving usability, autonomy, and continence outcomes. This presentation reviews the current landscape of next-generation AUS, focusing on ARTUS, UroActive®, and other devices under clinical evaluation. We discuss preclinical and first-in-human data, regulatory pathways, patient-reported preferences, and remaining barriers such as infection risks and training requirements. Intelligent, connected AUS devices hold promise to transform continence care after decades of technological stagnation.Choosing between Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy and Lateral Suspension: Weighing the Pros and ConsPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition requiring surgical intervention to restore apical support. Among minimally invasive options, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) remains the gold standard, while laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) is gaining renewed interest for its reduced invasiveness and simplified technique. This presentation compares LSCP and LLS across multiple dimensions: anatomical restoration, functional outcomes, complication profiles, patient selection, and surgical learning curves. LSCP offers robust long-term results and better posterior compartment support but carries increased operative complexity. LLS provides effective anterior/apical correction with fewer vascular risks and a shorter learning curve. Both techniques have comparable mesh exposure rates and subjective success. Individualized decision-making based on patient anatomy, comorbidities, and surgeon expertise remains key. Emerging technologies and robotic assistance may further refine these approaches in the future.Robotic Novel Artificial Urinary Sphincter ImplantationThis video shows a step by step robotic artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women using AMS800 and Artus devices.First robot-assisted implantation of ARTUS (Affluent Medical) electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter in a female cadaverIntroduction
Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) are effective tools for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Nonetheless, hydraulic sphincters present with some limitations: complex and time-consuming preparation, need for preserved manual dexterity and constant pressure exertion on the bladder neck. The ARTUS® Artificial Urinary Sphincter is a novel electro-mechanical device designed to overcome these limitations thanks to its rapid and straight-forward implantation, intuitive remotely controlled manipulation and continuously adjustable cuff pressure.
Materials and methods
The ARTUS® system is currently under pre-market investigation in men, in an interventional, prospective, single arm, multicentric, international study. A cadaver lab session was carried out in Decembre 2024 to test the technical feasibility of ARTUS® implantation in female patients. The procedure was performed by an expert surgeon with extensive experience in AUS implantation and robotic surgery.
Results
One female patient was successfully implanted during the session. The technique has been developed following the principles of the traditional robot-assisted AUS implantation: the patient is placed in gynecological 23° Trendelenburg position. The robot has a 4-arms configuration. The procedure starts with the dissection of the vesicovaginal plane, to approach the bladder neck posteriorly. The lateral surfaces of the bladder neck are developed on both sides. The anterior peritoneum is opened to gain access to the antero-lateral surfaces of the bladder. The separation of the bladder neck from the vagina is performed through dissection of the pre-vaginal fascia bilaterally. The cuff is introduced and it is passed through the antero-lateral peri-vesical spaces, sliding behind the bladder neck from the right side to the left side. The anterior peritoneum is opened to gain access to the anterior surface of the bladder neck. The cuff is closed anteriorly, passing the transmission line inside the hole at the distal part of the cuff. The tightening around the bladder neck is achieved by pulling the transmission cable through. An optimal adjustment of the cuff around the bladder neck is provided tightening the ARTUS cuff clamping notch. Then, a supra-pubic 4 cm skin incision is made to implant the control unit. The tip of the cuff is passed outside through the incision. A lodge is prepared incising along the external oblique muscle aponeurosis. The cuff is connected to the control unit and a test with the remote control is performed to verify the functioning of the system. Finally, the control unit is placed into the lodge, anchored with non-absorbable sutures to the aponeurosis.
Conclusions
Robot-assisted ARTUS® implantation is technically feasible in female patients. This straight-forward technique may reduce operative time. The device has the potential to reduce the pressure and facilitate manipulation in patients with impaired dexterity.
-
Howard GoldmanUnited States
Speaker
Anti-Cholinergics: Does Treating the Bladder Put the Brain at Risk?Recent evidence suggests an association between Overactive Bladder Anticholinergic medication and dementia. Do these medications really increase one's risk of dementia. We will examine the evidence.Surgical Treatments for Recurrent SUI/POPEven the best of surgeon's will have patients who have recurrence after a stress incontinence or pelvic organ prolapse procedure. If the recurrent is bothersome the patient may need repeat surgery. How to decide on the ideal surgery for recurrent symptoms will be examined
-
Tai-Lung ChaTaiwan
Speaker
Novel Target for GU Cancer Metastasis and TherapeuticsCancer progression is shaped by both cell-intrinsic adaptations and complex extrinsic interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we identify a transmembrane protein, Meta1, as a shared therapeutic target that exhibits a Janus-like role: promoting malignant phenotypes in cancer cells while restraining tumor-supportive functions in non-cancerous stromal and immune cells. Meta1 is expressed in both compartments of the TME, orchestrating a dual program that supports metastasis and immune evasion. Mechanistically, we uncovered a malignancy-promoting factor (MPF) that acts as a functional ligand for Meta1, selectively enhancing pro-invasive signaling in cancer cells. We further identify Meta1 as an unconventional G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays as an accelerator in cancer cells of the TME. Meta1 interacts with Rho-GDI and Gαq to activate RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal remodeling and amoeboid migration, facilitating metastatic dissemination. We further identify MPF binding to Meta1 initiates Gβγ signaling, elevating intracellular cAMP and activating Rap1, thereby amplifying cell motility and metastatic potential. Leveraging the Meta1–MPF interaction, we designed MPF-derived peptides that specifically bind Meta1 and serve as the basis for a novel peptide-based PROTAC, which efficiently induces degradation of Meta1 and abrogates its pro-metastatic functions. Our study unveils Meta1 as an atypical GPCR with canonical signaling capacity and topological divergence, representing a shared and targetable vulnerability that bridges cancer cell-intrinsic adaptation with extrinsic TME communication. These findings establish the Meta1–MPF axis as a compelling therapeutic target for suppressing metastasis and reprogramming the TME.
-
Chun-Hou LiaoTaiwan
Speaker
Regeneration Medicine in Urology - A Promising Future or Hoax?Regenerative medicine comprises therapeutic strategies aimed at restoring tissue structure and function, rather than merely alleviating symptoms. By deploying cells, biomaterials, bioactive molecules, or combinations thereof, these interventions stimulate the body’s intrinsic repair mechanisms. This paradigm extends beyond traditional symptomatic treatment, offering the potential for true self-healing and organ reconstruction—ultimately prioritizing cure over chronic disease management.
Cell-based therapy has emerged as a promising intervention for various urogenital disorders, including erectile dysfunction (ED), bladder dysfunction, and male infertility. Current clinical research primarily focuses on mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs), investigating their safety, tolerability, and preliminary efficacy. Although early-phase studies suggest functional benefits—such as improved hemodynamics and tissue regeneration—most programs remain in preclinical or early clinical stages. A critical limitation remains the lack of standardization in MSC source, dose, and delivery route.
Among alternative sources, human amniotic fluid-derived stem cells (hAFSCs) have shown particular promise. In preclinical models of cavernous nerve injury, hAFSCs demonstrated prolonged retention in penile tissue and in-situ differentiation into α-smooth muscle actin-positive corporal smooth muscle cells, effectively replacing damaged tissue and restoring function. These findings represent an encouraging step toward curative therapy. However, the mechanisms governing their in vivo behavior—such as engraftment, differentiation, and immunogenicity—will ultimately determine their clinical translatability and therapeutic stability. Whether cell-based approaches can evolve from experimental platforms into routine clinical care remains a central question.
Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)
Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is an autologous biologic product enriched with supraphysiologic levels of platelets, growth factors, chemokines, and extracellular vesicles. Upon activation, PRP releases a bioactive cocktail that promotes angiogenesis, neuroregeneration, and antifibrotic remodeling—key processes in the restoration of urogenital tissues.
In rodent models of cavernous nerve injury, PRP has been shown to preserve corporal sinusoidal endothelial cells and axonal scaffolds, while restoring erectile hemodynamics. Clinical studies further support PRP's safety in humans and report variable but promising improvements in IIEF scores following intracavernous injection. Nevertheless, the therapeutic response appears heterogeneous, likely influenced by patient factors, PRP preparation techniques, and injection protocols. Beyond ED, PRP has shown potential in other urologic indications such as stress urinary incontinence (SUI), interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), and chronic pelvic pain, where it may contribute to tissue regeneration and symptom relief. However, broader adoption will require the establishment of individualized blood-quality metrics, standardized preparation methods, and randomized controlled trials demonstrating durable benefit.
Emerging Regenerative Strategies
Beyond cell-based and autologous biologics, a suite of innovative regenerative technologies is progressing from bench to bedside. These include:
Energy-based devices such as low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (Li-ESWT), which promotes neovascularization and tissue regeneration via mechanotransduction pathways.
Gene therapies, targeting dysfunctional or absent proteins in disorders like overactive bladder.
Smart biomaterials, capable of delivering cells or bioactive molecules in a controlled, responsive manner.
Extracellular vesicle (EV)-based therapeutics, which leverage cell-free vesicles derived from MSCs or urine-derived stem cells. These EVs carry signaling molecules (e.g., microRNAs, cytokines, growth factors) that mimic the paracrine effects of stem cells, offering a potentially safer and more scalable alternative to cell transplantation.
In preclinical models of ED and bladder dysfunction, EVs have demonstrated the capacity to promote smooth muscle regeneration, nerve sprouting, and fibrosis reduction, with functional improvements comparable to stem cell therapy.
Regenerative medicine has propelled the field of urologic tissue repair from theoretical promise to an early clinical reality. While substantial challenges remain—including the need for deeper mechanistic insight, protocol standardization, and regulatory clarity—the field is advancing rapidly. The convergence of cell therapy, PRP, EVs, and device-based modalities is creating a multifaceted toolkit for urologic regeneration. With continued scientific rigor, large-scale clinical trials, and interdisciplinary collaboration, regenerative medicine holds the potential to shift urologic care from chronic symptomatic management to durable, tissue-level cure.Stem Cell Therapy: Advancements and Clinical Insights for Erectile Dysfunction Treatment Erectile dysfunction (ED)—defined as the persistent inability to achieve or maintain an erection sufficient for satisfactory sexual activity—affects over 150 million men worldwide. While phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors (PDE5is) remain the first-line treatment, many patients, particularly those with diabetes, age-related vascular decline, or neuropathy following radical prostatectomy, show suboptimal responses. Consequently, regenerative medicine—particularly stem-cell therapy—has gained interest for its potential to address the root causes of ED rather than merely managing symptoms.
Stem-cell therapy offers a multifaceted approach to treating ED through neuroregeneration, angiogenesis, anti-apoptotic signaling, and fibrosis inhibition. Once introduced into the target tissue, stem cells can differentiate into specific cell types or exert paracrine effects via secretion of growth factors and extracellular vesicles. Among the various sources studied, bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BM-MSCs), adipose-derived stem cells (ADSCs), and umbilical cord-derived MSCs (UC-MSCs) have been most extensively explored.
Preclinical studies consistently demonstrate that MSC-based therapies enhance cavernous nerve regeneration, suppress fibrosis, and preserve endothelial integrity. In rat models of diabetes- or nerve-injury-induced ED, intracavernosal injections of ADSCs or BM-MSCs significantly restore intracavernosal pressure (ICP) and improve corpus cavernosum histology. Phase I/II clinical trials also support the safety and preliminary efficacy of stem-cell approaches. For example, in men with diabetic ED treated with autologous BM-MSCs, significant improvements in International Index of Erectile Function-5 (IIEF-5) scores and penile arterial flow have been reported without major adverse events. Similarly, ADSC therapy in post-prostatectomy ED has shown encouraging short-term results. However, large-scale trials are needed to clarify long-term efficacy, immune responses, and safety profiles.
Human amniotic fluid stem cells (hAFSCs) represent a promising alternative, offering characteristics that bridge embryonic and adult stem-cell profiles. These include broad multipotency, high proliferation, and low immunogenicity—traits ideal for allogeneic use and neuroregenerative purposes. Notably, hAFSCs secrete potent regenerative mediators such as brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF), vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), and insulin-like growth factor-1 (IGF-1), all of which support neurovascular repair and smooth muscle integrity. Our recent studies demonstrate, for the first time, that hAFSCs persist long-term in penile tissue and can differentiate into cavernous smooth-muscle cells, effectively replacing damaged tissue and improving erectile function even in chronic neurogenic ED models.
Despite these advantages, our findings did not reveal in-vivo homing of hAFSCs to nerve injury sites or differentiation into neural tissue. This suggests a need for future studies to identify the specific microenvironmental cues required to induce such responses. Additionally, combining hAFSCs with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may provide synergistic benefits—enhancing stem-cell homing, paracrine signaling, and in-vivo differentiation—thereby advancing a more effective, scalable, and safe therapeutic strategy.
-
Yao-Chi ChuangTaiwan
Moderator
Road to Excellent ResearchYao Chi Chuang, Professor of Urology, Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, and National Sun Yat-sen University Taiwan.
Medical research is what allows doctors to explore unmet medical need and decide how to best treat patients. It is what makes the development of new diagnostic tools, new biomarkers, new medicines, and new procedures. Without medical research, we would not be able to creative new knowledge and decide if new treatments are better than our current treatments.
There are some Tips on what to do about what research is and how to get into it:
1. Ask a good question from your daily practice, what is unmet medical need?
2. Search the old literature of your research interests- what is known? What is unknown?
3. Find a new method to solve your question or an old method but applying to a new field.
4. Start from jointing a pre-planned research project, and join a research collaborative.
5. Try to be an independent researcher from a small project without funding support, retrospective study.
6. Try to get funding support from your institute, national grant, or industry.
As a young doctor, it’s important to look after yourself and maintain a healthy balance between daily practice and research work. There is a range of options for doctors interested in research, from smaller time commitments as a co-investigator to longer-term projects and experience as chief investigator. Research works are all optional activities, so do what you can but don’t overwhelm yourself. Road to Excellent Research
Chawnshang ChangUnited States
Speaker
The Roles of Androgen Receptor in Bladder and Kidney Cancers1- Study why prostate cancer (PCa) may develop to the castration-resistant PCa, and develop new therapy to overcome the CRPC.
2- Study the roles of androgen receptor in the bladder cancer early development and later metastasis stage.
3- Cloning the 2nd androgen receptor in the bladder cancer
TICC - 3F Banquet Hall
|
|
12:00
13:00
|
Advances and Clinical Applications in ESWL Symposium
TICC - 3F South Lounge
|
|
13:30
15:00
|
-
John DavisUnited States
Speaker
Open Surgery Training: Is It Necessary in the Era of Robotics?Open surgery training in the era of robotics may or may not be a training environment that urology has control of, given worldwide access to robotic or at least laparoscopic techniques and strong patient preference. There may be some applications where a given experienced urologist can prefer open over minimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as radical cystectomy, or indications possibly outside of MIS feasibility such as large renal tumors with caval thrombus. Specific to training and expertise, there are 3 principle features of surgical skills desired: 1) knowing ideal exposure, 2) recognition of surgical planes, and 3) knowing anatomy before it can be seen. Although some trainees may only see MIS for certain indications, open surgery may expedite the process. There are no human studies identified on the topic, but a skills lab study was instructive (Farah, J Surgical Education 2023) showing that interns with open and MIS training performed higher comparing pre-intern to post intern bootcamp skills. The benefits of a solid training pathway including open experience are to move trainees towards the faster-to-progress part of the learning curve such that the attending can offer a safe training environment while moving the case along efficiently.The Future of Surgical Skills Evaluation: What Is on Your Wish List?Surgical skills training vary significantly by region with some systems putting trainees on a timed set of years, while others apprentice trainees until meeting a threshold for skills. Early training assessments were basic timed events with qualitative scores (subject to strong attending selection for success). Trainees should experience and/or study the key pitfalls to avoid and performance goals. Surgical simulation can be highly useful, but tend to improve only certain skills and not full case needs. Updated simulation moves from digital to hands on surgical models and may move the needle towards human experience. Training can be augmented with descriptors of surgical gestures and measuring which ones are most effective. The experience for the trainee is often depicted as an "autonomy gap" whereby the training desires to have case control, possibly before they are ready. Progression can be measured by descriptors of performance from assistance through full performance without coaching. The next frontier will be artificial intelligence guided measurement where specific performances can be characterized and diagnosed for success. My ultimate wishlist would be for methods to correlate skills to outcomes, optimized curricula, and a specific pathway to correct underperformance.Tips and Tricks in Challenging Cases of Robotic Radical ProstatectomyThere are many specific challenges with robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) that can be described and illustrated--the most 5 common are 1) difficulty access, 2) obesity, 3) pubic arch interference, 4) anatomic challenges, and 5) reconstruction challenges. In this video sample, we demonstrate 2 challenges: obesity requiring a pelvic lymph node dissection and significant pelvic de-fatting to identify the proper surgical landmarks. Next a massive sized prostate that has had a partial transurethral resection--together presenting challenges with landmarks, a difficult bladder neck to diagnose, and final reconstruction challenges.
-
Vipul R. PatelUnited States
Speaker
Lessons from 20,000 Robotic Prostatectomies: A Global Expert’s PerspectiveTechnical Considerations for Large Prostates over 100gmsTelesurgery: The Future of Surgery
-
Simone CrivellaroUnited States
Speaker
Single-Port vs. Multi-Port Robotic Prostatectomy: Balancing Innovation, Precision, and OutcomesThe Application & Limitation of Urological SP SurgerySingle Port Retroperitoneal Partial NephrectomySingle Port Prostate Surgery
-
Ketan BadaniUnited States
Speaker
Expanding horizons: SP for complex RAPNThe Future of Urological Robotic SurgerySingle-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple or Large Renal TumorsHow to Standardize Training by AI-Learning from The Best Practice of Urological Robotic SurgerySP Partial Nephrectomy
-
Wenjie ZhongAustralia
Speaker
Emergency Undocking in Robotic Urology Surgery - Preparedness, Protocols, and PracticeIntroduction:
Robotic surgery has revolutionized urologic procedures, offering precision and minimally invasive benefits. However, the complexity of the robotic interface introduces the rare but potentially catastrophic need for emergency undocking - a rapid disengagement of the robotic system in response to patient or technical emergencies.
Objective:
To review the current best practices, protocols, and preparedness strategies for emergency undocking during robotic urologic surgery, with a focus on multidisciplinary coordination, training, and outcome optimization.
Methods:
A structured review of the literature was conducted, including case reports, institutional protocols, and guideline recommendations from leading urological societies (AUA, EAU). In addition, procedural algorithms and simulation-based training approaches were analyzed to assess their impact on team performance and patient safety.
Results:
Emergency undocking occurs in fewer than 0.1% of robotic cases but is associated with high morbidity if delays occur. Key indications include sudden hemodynamic collapse, cardiac arrest, airway compromise, and robotic system malfunction. Simulation training has been shown to improve undocking times by up to 35%. Effective response hinges on predefined roles, verbal cues, and practiced protocols. Institutions with regular team drills report faster response times and better outcomes in high-acuity scenarios.
Conclusion:
Although infrequent, emergency undocking represents a critical moment in robotic surgery that demands rapid, coordinated team action. Implementing standardized protocols, reinforcing multidisciplinary simulations, and fostering a culture of readiness can significantly improve patient safety and surgical outcomes.
-
Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan
Speaker
ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends,
It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS).
This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation.
Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction
Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration.
Results
Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups.
Conclusions
Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background:
Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn.
Material and Methods:
We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months.
Results:
The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery.
Conclusion:
We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground:
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications.
Objective:
This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques.
Methods:
We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied.
Results:
Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of
prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible.
Conclusion:
The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency.
Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques.
Significance:
This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate
cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall
|
|
13:30
15:00
|
Advancing Focal Therapy in Localized Prostate Cancer: From Patient Stratification to Post-HIFU Management
-
-
-
-
Peter Ka-Fung ChiuHong Kong, China
Speaker
Minimal Invasive Therapy: Where do We Stand in 2025Endourological, Laparoscopic and robotic surgeries have replaced most open surgeries in Urology. Emergence of new robotic platforms have provided urologists with new opportunities. Both boom-type and module-type robots have been used, and they each have their strengths in practice. Tele-surgeries have provided a new paradigm of long-distance robotic surgeries to facilitate new surgical possibilities and proctorship. State of the art robotic surgeries in retrograde intrarenal surgeries and enbloc resection MDT Discussion: Personalizing Treatment in High Volume CSPCN/ADebate: Should We Only Offer Consolidative Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic RCC?N/AFocal Therapy in Asia – Is It Prime Time?The increase in incidence of Prostate cancer has been rapid in Asia in the past 10 years. While Robotic radical prostatectomy and Radiotherapy has been the commonest treatments for localized prostate cancer, significant long-term morbidities are observed after surgery or radiotherapy including incontinence, erectile dysfunction and irradiation injury to the bladder and rectum. In the current era of MRI-guided prostate biopsy, focal diseases can be targeted and diagnosed, and image-guided focal therapy emerged as an alternative treatment. Although Focal therapy has a relatively higher rate of local recurrence, it has the advantages of minimal or no long-term complication after treatment, and it is possible to perform retreatment with focal therapy, prostatectomy or radiotherapy. In properly selected patients, the need for salvage prostatectomy or radiotherapy after focal therapy is less than 20% at 8 years, and patients’ quality of life could be preserved. In well-selected patients, focal therapy is an attractive option. Current focal therapy for prostate cancer available in Asia includes HIFU, Cryotherapy, Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA), irreversible electroporation (IRE) and TULSA.
-
-
-
-
TICC - 1F 101B
|
