New Artificial Urinary Sphinter

15 Aug 2025 10:45 11:00
Chun-Te WuTaiwan Moderator 健保各領域審查共識及討論-泌尿腫瘤
Véronique PhéFrance Speaker New Artificial Urinary SphinterStress urinary incontinence remains a major quality-of-life concern, particularly following pelvic surgery. Despite being the gold standard, the AMS 800 artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) presents significant limitations, including mechanical failure, urethral atrophy, and challenges for elderly or disabled patients. Recent innovations in AUS design now incorporate mechatronics, remote control, adaptive pressure systems, and miniaturized components aimed at improving usability, autonomy, and continence outcomes. This presentation reviews the current landscape of next-generation AUS, focusing on ARTUS, UroActive®, and other devices under clinical evaluation. We discuss preclinical and first-in-human data, regulatory pathways, patient-reported preferences, and remaining barriers such as infection risks and training requirements. Intelligent, connected AUS devices hold promise to transform continence care after decades of technological stagnation.Choosing between Laparoscopic Sacrocolpopexy and Lateral Suspension: Weighing the Pros and ConsPelvic organ prolapse (POP) is a common condition requiring surgical intervention to restore apical support. Among minimally invasive options, laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy (LSCP) remains the gold standard, while laparoscopic lateral suspension (LLS) is gaining renewed interest for its reduced invasiveness and simplified technique. This presentation compares LSCP and LLS across multiple dimensions: anatomical restoration, functional outcomes, complication profiles, patient selection, and surgical learning curves. LSCP offers robust long-term results and better posterior compartment support but carries increased operative complexity. LLS provides effective anterior/apical correction with fewer vascular risks and a shorter learning curve. Both techniques have comparable mesh exposure rates and subjective success. Individualized decision-making based on patient anatomy, comorbidities, and surgeon expertise remains key. Emerging technologies and robotic assistance may further refine these approaches in the future.Robotic Novel Artificial Urinary Sphincter ImplantationThis video shows a step by step robotic artificial urinary sphincter implantation in women using AMS800 and Artus devices.First robot-assisted implantation of ARTUS (Affluent Medical) electromechanical artificial urinary sphincter in a female cadaverIntroduction Artificial urinary sphincters (AUS) are effective tools for the treatment of female stress urinary incontinence. Nonetheless, hydraulic sphincters present with some limitations: complex and time-consuming preparation, need for preserved manual dexterity and constant pressure exertion on the bladder neck. The ARTUS® Artificial Urinary Sphincter is a novel electro-mechanical device designed to overcome these limitations thanks to its rapid and straight-forward implantation, intuitive remotely controlled manipulation and continuously adjustable cuff pressure. Materials and methods The ARTUS® system is currently under pre-market investigation in men, in an interventional, prospective, single arm, multicentric, international study. A cadaver lab session was carried out in Decembre 2024 to test the technical feasibility of ARTUS® implantation in female patients. The procedure was performed by an expert surgeon with extensive experience in AUS implantation and robotic surgery. Results One female patient was successfully implanted during the session. The technique has been developed following the principles of the traditional robot-assisted AUS implantation: the patient is placed in gynecological 23° Trendelenburg position. The robot has a 4-arms configuration. The procedure starts with the dissection of the vesicovaginal plane, to approach the bladder neck posteriorly. The lateral surfaces of the bladder neck are developed on both sides. The anterior peritoneum is opened to gain access to the antero-lateral surfaces of the bladder. The separation of the bladder neck from the vagina is performed through dissection of the pre-vaginal fascia bilaterally. The cuff is introduced and it is passed through the antero-lateral peri-vesical spaces, sliding behind the bladder neck from the right side to the left side. The anterior peritoneum is opened to gain access to the anterior surface of the bladder neck. The cuff is closed anteriorly, passing the transmission line inside the hole at the distal part of the cuff. The tightening around the bladder neck is achieved by pulling the transmission cable through. An optimal adjustment of the cuff around the bladder neck is provided tightening the ARTUS cuff clamping notch. Then, a supra-pubic 4 cm skin incision is made to implant the control unit. The tip of the cuff is passed outside through the incision. A lodge is prepared incising along the external oblique muscle aponeurosis. The cuff is connected to the control unit and a test with the remote control is performed to verify the functioning of the system. Finally, the control unit is placed into the lodge, anchored with non-absorbable sutures to the aponeurosis. Conclusions Robot-assisted ARTUS® implantation is technically feasible in female patients. This straight-forward technique may reduce operative time. The device has the potential to reduce the pressure and facilitate manipulation in patients with impaired dexterity.