Cheng-Kuang Yang

1. Uro-oncology surgery and treatment 2. Robotic , Laparoscopic , Conventional oncological surgery 3. Retroperitoneal / Pelvic sarcoma surgery and treatment 4. Kidney transplantation

14th August 2025

Time Session
08:30
17:00
  • Tai-Lung ChaTaiwan Speaker Novel Target for GU Cancer Metastasis and TherapeuticsCancer progression is shaped by both cell-intrinsic adaptations and complex extrinsic interactions within the tumor microenvironment (TME). Here, we identify a transmembrane protein, Meta1, as a shared therapeutic target that exhibits a Janus-like role: promoting malignant phenotypes in cancer cells while restraining tumor-supportive functions in non-cancerous stromal and immune cells. Meta1 is expressed in both compartments of the TME, orchestrating a dual program that supports metastasis and immune evasion. Mechanistically, we uncovered a malignancy-promoting factor (MPF) that acts as a functional ligand for Meta1, selectively enhancing pro-invasive signaling in cancer cells. We further identify Meta1 as an unconventional G protein–coupled receptor (GPCR) that plays as an accelerator in cancer cells of the TME. Meta1 interacts with Rho-GDI and Gαq to activate RhoA-mediated cytoskeletal remodeling and amoeboid migration, facilitating metastatic dissemination. We further identify MPF binding to Meta1 initiates Gβγ signaling, elevating intracellular cAMP and activating Rap1, thereby amplifying cell motility and metastatic potential. Leveraging the Meta1–MPF interaction, we designed MPF-derived peptides that specifically bind Meta1 and serve as the basis for a novel peptide-based PROTAC, which efficiently induces degradation of Meta1 and abrogates its pro-metastatic functions. Our study unveils Meta1 as an atypical GPCR with canonical signaling capacity and topological divergence, representing a shared and targetable vulnerability that bridges cancer cell-intrinsic adaptation with extrinsic TME communication. These findings establish the Meta1–MPF axis as a compelling therapeutic target for suppressing metastasis and reprogramming the TME.
    Ponco BirowoIndonesia Speaker Pressure Management Strategy in RIRS using Tidor System
    Allen W. ChiuTaiwan Speaker Reflecting on the Past, Shaping the Present, and Envisioning the Future of UAASince 1990, the Urological Association of Asia (UAA) has stood as a beacon of collaboration, innovation, and advancement in urology in Asia. As we reflect on its evolution, acknowledge its current impact, and envision its future, it becomes clear that the UAA has played - and will continue to play - a pivotal role in shaping urological care, education, and research throughout Asia. Reflecting on the path we’ve traveled together from 16 member associations and 1,000 individual members in 2014 to 28 member associations and over 4,500 individual members today - I see more than growth. I see unity, commitment, and a shared belief in something bigger than ourselves. A defining milestone was enrolling the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand into the UAA, further enriching our diversity and strengthening our position as a truly Asia-Pacific organization. The UAA proudly supports several journals, including the International Journal of Urology, the Indian Journal of Urology, Asian Urology, which continue to shape the academic discourse. The Asian Urological Resident Course (AURC) started in 2014, in collaboration with the American Urological Association, has become a cornerstone in nurturing clinical excellence among young urologists. The Young Leadership Forum, since 2012, developed in partnership with the European Urological Association, has fostered cross-continental mentorship and exchange. These initiatives symbolize our commitment to creating a future shared across borders. We have faced challenges under the impact of COVID-19, but conquered it with resilience and shared purpose. As healthcare needs evolve and patient expectations rise, the UAA aims to: 1. Promote regional research 2. Enhance training and education 3. Strengthen partnerships 4. Champion equity in healthcare.Complex Robotic Assisted Surgery for Urinary Fistula RepairRobotic-assisted (da Vinci) surgery is increasingly used for repair of urinary fistulas, including vesicovaginal, ureterovaginal, and enterovesical fistula. It offers a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. A case report described using the da Vinci X system to fix a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) post-hysterectomy in 105 min with no complications, a 2 day hospital stay, and excellent patient reported quality-of-life at 12 months. A literature review including 30 cases showed robotic repair of VVF reduced blood loss and shortened hospital stays by 2 days compared to open repair. A review found that robotic repair of complex urinary fistulas is technically feasible in expert hands, with good early outcomes and less morbidity than open techniques. This presentation illustrated the key operative procedures, inlcuding ureteral catheter placement to identify the ureteral tract, anchoring stitches on opened urinary bladder wall, robotic excision of the fistula tract, layered closure of bladder wall and adjacent organ (vagina or colon), with or without Interposition of tissue flaps (e.g. omentum or peritoneal flaps) to reinforce repair. The robot provides precise and secure ileal isolation with ICG technique for the ileal isolation, and and intracorporeal anastomosis to ureter and urinary bladder are safe. Intracorporeal bowel re-anastomosis and accessibility of the da Vinci platform is becoming more popular. The isolated ileal technique provides good urinary reconstruction (e.g., Neobladder, Augmentation Cystoplasty Ileal conduit (Bricker’s procedure), Orthotopic neobladder (Studer, Hautmann, etc.) The Role of the robot to harvestest, detubularize, and fold ileum to form bladder substitute. Suture to urethra and ureters. It is often performed entirely intracorporeally with the da Vinci Xi system.
    Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan Speaker ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends, It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS). This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation. Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration. Results Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups. Conclusions Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background: Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn. Material and Methods: We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months. Results: The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications. Objective: This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques. Methods: We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied. Results: Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible. Conclusion: The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency. Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques. Significance: This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
  • Jason Lui LetranPhilippines Speaker ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology Collaboration
    Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan Speaker ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends, It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS). This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation. Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration. Results Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups. Conclusions Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background: Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn. Material and Methods: We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months. Results: The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications. Objective: This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques. Methods: We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied. Results: Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible. Conclusion: The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency. Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques. Significance: This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
  • Allen W. ChiuTaiwan Moderator Reflecting on the Past, Shaping the Present, and Envisioning the Future of UAASince 1990, the Urological Association of Asia (UAA) has stood as a beacon of collaboration, innovation, and advancement in urology in Asia. As we reflect on its evolution, acknowledge its current impact, and envision its future, it becomes clear that the UAA has played - and will continue to play - a pivotal role in shaping urological care, education, and research throughout Asia. Reflecting on the path we’ve traveled together from 16 member associations and 1,000 individual members in 2014 to 28 member associations and over 4,500 individual members today - I see more than growth. I see unity, commitment, and a shared belief in something bigger than ourselves. A defining milestone was enrolling the Urological Society of Australia and New Zealand into the UAA, further enriching our diversity and strengthening our position as a truly Asia-Pacific organization. The UAA proudly supports several journals, including the International Journal of Urology, the Indian Journal of Urology, Asian Urology, which continue to shape the academic discourse. The Asian Urological Resident Course (AURC) started in 2014, in collaboration with the American Urological Association, has become a cornerstone in nurturing clinical excellence among young urologists. The Young Leadership Forum, since 2012, developed in partnership with the European Urological Association, has fostered cross-continental mentorship and exchange. These initiatives symbolize our commitment to creating a future shared across borders. We have faced challenges under the impact of COVID-19, but conquered it with resilience and shared purpose. As healthcare needs evolve and patient expectations rise, the UAA aims to: 1. Promote regional research 2. Enhance training and education 3. Strengthen partnerships 4. Champion equity in healthcare.Complex Robotic Assisted Surgery for Urinary Fistula RepairRobotic-assisted (da Vinci) surgery is increasingly used for repair of urinary fistulas, including vesicovaginal, ureterovaginal, and enterovesical fistula. It offers a minimally invasive alternative to open surgery. A case report described using the da Vinci X system to fix a vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) post-hysterectomy in 105 min with no complications, a 2 day hospital stay, and excellent patient reported quality-of-life at 12 months. A literature review including 30 cases showed robotic repair of VVF reduced blood loss and shortened hospital stays by 2 days compared to open repair. A review found that robotic repair of complex urinary fistulas is technically feasible in expert hands, with good early outcomes and less morbidity than open techniques. This presentation illustrated the key operative procedures, inlcuding ureteral catheter placement to identify the ureteral tract, anchoring stitches on opened urinary bladder wall, robotic excision of the fistula tract, layered closure of bladder wall and adjacent organ (vagina or colon), with or without Interposition of tissue flaps (e.g. omentum or peritoneal flaps) to reinforce repair. The robot provides precise and secure ileal isolation with ICG technique for the ileal isolation, and and intracorporeal anastomosis to ureter and urinary bladder are safe. Intracorporeal bowel re-anastomosis and accessibility of the da Vinci platform is becoming more popular. The isolated ileal technique provides good urinary reconstruction (e.g., Neobladder, Augmentation Cystoplasty Ileal conduit (Bricker’s procedure), Orthotopic neobladder (Studer, Hautmann, etc.) The Role of the robot to harvestest, detubularize, and fold ileum to form bladder substitute. Suture to urethra and ureters. It is often performed entirely intracorporeally with the da Vinci Xi system.
    Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan Moderator ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends, It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS). This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation. Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration. Results Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups. Conclusions Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background: Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn. Material and Methods: We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months. Results: The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications. Objective: This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques. Methods: We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied. Results: Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible. Conclusion: The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency. Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques. Significance: This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
    Chi-Fai NgHong Kong, China Moderator Novel Robotic Surgery PlatformsOver the past decades, robotic surgery has become an essential approach in urological care. The recent blooming of different robotic platforms, in particular in Asian countries, has helped popularize robotic surgery in less developed countries. The introduction of robotic technology in endoluminal surgery has also helped to open up opportunities to further improve endourology. In the future, the incorporation of AI in robotic systems will help upgrade the standard of care in urology.
  • Gang ZhuChina Speaker Enhancing Robotic Surgery with AI and Imaging Navigation: Bridging Precision and Efficiency
  • Xu Zhang China Speaker From Console to Cloud: The Evolution of Robotic Telesurgery in Urology – Innovations, Trials, and Ethical FrontiersTelesurgery is an emerging branch of surgery that utilizes telecommunication technology and surgical robots to perform operations. It breaks the spatial constraints on the conduct of surgical procedures and represents a systematic innovation brought about by the intersection of new technologies and concepts such as robotic surgery, telecommunication, and artificial intelligence. It holds promise as a potential solution to the uneven distribution of medical resources. Currently, China's research in telesurgery has reached the forefront of the international stage. Building a high-quality disciplinary development ecosystem and a regional collaborative system for remote surgery will be the inevitable path to maintaining a leading position. Providing national-level project support for telesurgery, establishing a national-level joint innovation group, creating a regional medical consortium for remote surgery, and formulating legal norms and treatment guidelines will pave the way for the sustainable development of telesurgery in China. It is believed that with the strong support of the state, Chinese surgeons will seize the opportunity, lead the new wave of surgical development, integrate new telesurgery technologies into the national universal healthcare system, and benefit a large number of patients.
  • John DavisUnited States Speaker Open Surgery Training: Is It Necessary in the Era of Robotics?The Future of Surgical Skills Evaluation: What Is on Your Wish List?Tips and Tricks in Challenging Cases of Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
  • Ryoichi Shiroki Japan Speaker Surgical Robot-System hinotori in Urological Surgery: Clinical Applications and Future PotentialThe hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has been designed to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside. Equipped with four 8-axis robotic arms, providing smooth, highly articulated movements that mimic the human hand. In addition, docking-free design allows for a wide operative field around trocars, ensuring smooth workflows for surgeons and assistants. As a made-in-Japan system, it offers high adaptability to local clinical needs and faster implementation of user feedback. Since the first launch, more 90 systems have been installed for the clinical use, not only inside Japan but foreign countries such as Singapore and Malaysia. The first one was performed in December 2020 on prostatectomy. Since then, more than 100,000 cases performed, including urology GI surgery, gynecology and thoracic fields. In urological surgery, robot-assisted surgery has been widely and promptly accepted as a standard approach for the majority of major surgeries, including robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), partial nephrectomy (RAPN), radical nephrectomy (RARN), radical nephroureterectomy (RANU), and radical cystectomy (RARC), and has generally shown findings superior to those of conventional open and laparoscopic surgeries In conclusion, hinotori is a cutting-edge Japanese surgical robot already in use at many medical institutions. With strong performance across various surgical specialties and growing insurance coverage, it is expected to benefit even more patients as its technology continues to evolve and its global presence expands.Comparison of Various Current Surgical Robotic Systems - Nuances, Advantages, & DrawbacksIn the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical care in the majority of surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. We, Fujita, installed the four different kinds of robotic platform for clinical usage such as, daVinci Xi, SP, hinotori and Hugo. In this study, we want to analyze the perioperative outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and characterize the differences between four platforms. hinotori : The hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has a compact operation arm with eight axes of motion, one more than the DaVinci, leading to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside. DaVinci SP : The characteristic of the SP system can operate one 3D flexible camera and three forceps through a single port, and various surgical access is possible without the external interference of the arms. The various complicated procedures have been feasible such as NOTES or transoral surgery through the narrow space without the large wound, and retroperitoneal approach like the prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. SP system is expected to contribute to develop the high quality surgery with minimal invasiveness. Hugo : Hugo system (Medtronic) consists of an open-site console with two arm-controllers that are operated with a grip similar to a pistol. It also has a footswitch that controls the camera, energy source, and reserve arm. The system includes four separate arm carts, each with six joints to increase the range of motion. Additionally, it uses specific 3D glasses for head tracking technology. Despite a small case series, there seemed to need learning-curve to get familiar with systems in setting-up and surgical procedures in introductory-phase. However, all the surgical procedures were efficaciously and safely performed, resulting in the achievement of favorable perioperative outcomes surgically as well as oncologically. In conclusion, these new robots will lead to competition and reduce the costs of RAS and will contribute to an increase in use. Robotic-assisted surgery will become more common than laparoscopic surgery especially in the field of urology.
  • Mario Gyung-Tak SungKorea (Republic of) Speaker What's Next in Urologic Robotics in Asia: Future PerspectivesAdvancement of Novel Instruments/Gadgets in Urological Robotic Surgery
  • Edmund ChiongSingapore Moderator Debate: Bladder Preservation Should Be Considered for All Cases of MIBC
    KoonHo RhaKorea (Republic of) Moderator Trend in Healthcare AI
    Jian-Ri LiTaiwan Moderator Applying Vision Augmentation in Robotic Surgery: Reality or FictionApplying Vision Augmentation in Robotic Surgery: Reality or Fiction
  • Vipul R. PatelUnited States Speaker Lessons from 20,000 Robotic Prostatectomies: A Global Expert’s PerspectiveTechnical Considerations for Large Prostates over 100gmsTelesurgery: The Future of Surgery
  • Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan Speaker ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends, It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS). This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation. Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration. Results Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups. Conclusions Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background: Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn. Material and Methods: We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months. Results: The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications. Objective: This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques. Methods: We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied. Results: Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible. Conclusion: The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency. Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques. Significance: This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
  • Isaac KimUnited States Speaker Debulking the Primary: Robotic Cytoreductive Radical ProstatectomyUpdate on the Results of SIMCAP Study
  • Cheng-Kuang YangTaiwan Speaker Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Trying to Fit the Right Surgery to the Right PatientDefinitive treatment for localized prostate cancer included radical prostatectomy and radiation. Successful criteria of radical prostatectomy have to meet oncology control, not persistent PSA after surgery without salvage therapy. MRI imaging stage and PSA density are predictors for short‐term BCR after prostatectomy. NCCN‐defined high‐risk patients with a high initial PSA 28 density, imaging stage (T3aN0M0 and T3bN0M0), and 29 pathologic stage (any N1) had a higher risk of BCR when 30 compared with other patients with undetectable PSA, while 31 those with pathologic stage (T3bN0M0 or any N1) displayed 32 a higher risk of postoperatively detectable PSA. These find‐ 33 ings may help urologists to identify patients for whom active 34 therapeutic protocols are necessary.
  • Simone CrivellaroUnited States Speaker Single-Port vs. Multi-Port Robotic Prostatectomy: Balancing Innovation, Precision, and OutcomesThe Application & Limitation of Urological SP SurgerySingle Port Retroperitoneal Partial NephrectomySingle Port Prostate Surgery
  • Ming LiuChina Speaker Comparison of Hood technique vs Retzius sparing RARP: Beijing Hospital Experience.
  • Eddie ChanHong Kong, China Moderator How to Escape Surgical ComplicationsSurgical complications can significantly impact patient outcomes and healthcare resources. This talk will focus on practical strategies to minimize complications in urologic surgery, tailored specifically for urology fellows. Real-life case examples will illustrate how thoughtful preparation and proactive communication can prevent or mitigate complications. Additionally, we will discuss structured approaches to managing complications when they arise, including communication with the patient and team, documentation, and timely intervention. Through real-life case examples, this session aims to enhance surgical judgment, promote patient safety, and build confidence in complication management.
    Bannakij LojanapiwatThailand Moderator PSA Kinetics Following PADT in mHSPC. Is It a Real-World Tool for Predicting Oncologic Outcome?PSA Kinetics following Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy (PADT) in mHSPC. Is it a Real-world Tool for Prediction Oncologic Outcome? Bannakij Lojanapiwat, M.D. Professor of Urology, Chiang Mai University, Thailand. Of recent guidelines, upfront primary androgen deprivation monotherapy or combination therapy (PADT) is recommended for the treatment of metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC). Limitation of real-world treatment such as culture difference, financial barrier, geographic access to treatment and high operation/ radiation risks associated with medical comorbidity led to underutilization of combination therapy as the standard guideline. Prognostic factors are important in clinical practice which can predict the clinical outcome that offer the pre-treatment counseling for patients to select the optimal treatment. Prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels is one of the important key prognostic markers. PSA kinetics of nadir PSA level and time to nadir PSA following the treatment are the important role for progression to CRPC and oncologic outcome. Our study and the previous studies reported better oncologic outcome especially overall survival, cancer specific survival and time to developed CRPC in mHSPC patients received upfront PADT who decline PSA≥95% (deep responder), PSA nadir ≤ 0.2 ng/ml (low PSA nadir level), time to PSA nadir ≥ 6 month and PSA decline velocity <11 ng/ml/month. PSA Kinetics following Primary Androgen Deprivation Therapy (PADT) is one of a real-world tool for prediction oncologic outcome in the treatment of mHSPC.
  • Ketan BadaniUnited States Speaker Expanding horizons: SP for complex RAPNThe Future of Urological Robotic SurgerySingle-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple or Large Renal TumorsHow to Standardize Training by AI-Learning from The Best Practice of Urological Robotic SurgerySP Partial Nephrectomy
  • Hsiao-Jen ChungTaiwan Speaker Partial Nephrectomy: Managing Complications and Challenging Cases
  • Xuepei ZhangChina Speaker Robotic IVC Thrombectomy: Expanding the Role of Robotics in Vascular Involvement
  • Jason Lui LetranPhilippines Moderator ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology Collaboration
    Pai-Fu WangTaiwan Moderator
  • Jimmy NomuraJapan Speaker Robotic Sacrocolpopexy: Techniques, Challenges, and Long-Term Outcomes
  • Narasimhan RagavanIndia Speaker Robotic Vesico-Rectal and Vesico-Vaginal Repair: Innovations in Complex Fistula ManagementWe will be presenting our work on Vesicle vaginal fistula . We have described this as Chennai technique .
  • Xuesong LiChina Speaker Robotic Ureteral Reconstruction: Managing Strictures and Injuries
  • Masatoshi EtoJapan Moderator Current Status & Future Perspective of Surgical Navigation in Robotic SurgeryRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard treatment for small renal cancer, however, the number of reports on the development of the image supported system and its effectiveness is small. The key point in the procedure of RAPN is to reliably identify renal artery in a space with few landmarks and to resect a tumor. To performe RAPN safely and reliably, we have already developed a surgical navigation specialized for RAPN, and published its usefulness in daVinci surgical systems. In this lecture, I would like to talk our recent projects updating our current navigation system. The first project focuses on 3D navigation using real-time forceps tracking. The second project is to develop an AI-based autonomous registration method for surgical navigation in RAPN. I hope that these 2 projects will further enhance the usefulness of our navigation system in RAPN.
    Jeremy TeohHong Kong, China Moderator Transurethral En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor: Where Are We Now?There is increasing evidence that transurethral en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) could lead to better peri-operative and oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Modified approaches of ERBT have also been proposed to expand its indications for larger bladder tumours. The quality of resection is also the key for bladder-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We foresee an exciting journey ahead for ERBT, and as a urologist, we must embrace this novel technique for the best interest of our bladder cancer patients. To Publish or not to Publish? Navigating the path to academia in urologyDoing good science is the basis for technological advancement in healthcare. However, pursuing a path to academic in urology is often tough, stressful and frustrating. In this talk, I will share with you what I have learnt throughout my 15 years of research work. I will let you know what's the best and fastest way to become a globally renowned and successful researcher. Most importantly, I will explain what it takes to develop a great team and create a positive impact in people's lives. Believe in yourself! If I can do it, so can you.SIU Lecture: Role of MISTs in Male LUTS Surgical Management (Will TUR-P/ Laser Prostatectomy be Replaced?)Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) is the current gold standard in treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Laser prostatectomy has also been used widely especially in patients who are on anticoagulants. However, both TURP and laser prostatectomy are associated with several problems including the need of spinal / general anaesthesia and the risk of male sexual dysfunction. In the past decade, we have witnessed the introduction of multiple new technologies including Rezum, Urolift, iTind and Aquablation. in this SIU lecture, we will discuss about the technical details, as well as the pros and cons of every new technology. We will also invite you to be our jury and decide whether TURP and laser prostatectomy will be replaced in the future. Novel Intravesical Therapeutics in the Evolving Landscape of NMIBCNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is well known to be a difficult disease to manage, with a 1-year recurrence rate of up to 61% and 5-year recurrence rate of 78%. Despite the use of intravesical BCG therapy, NMIBC patients may still experience recurrence and develop what we call BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Conventionally, we offer upfront radical cystectomy for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, however, this is an ultra-major surgery with significant risk of complications and could also lead to significant deterioration in quality of life in the long run. We are in urgent need for novel therapies to manage this difficult condition. In this lecture, we will discuss the evidence on the different novel intravesical therapies in treating BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. SIU Lecture: Role of MISTs in Male LUTS Surgical Management (Will TUR-P/ Laser Prostatectomy be Replaced?)
    Rajeev KumarIndia Moderator Troubleshooting in Endoscopic Stone Surgery: How to Handle Unexpected Challenges in RIRS and ECIRSProstate Cancer Nomograms and Their Application in Asian MenNomograms help to predict outcomes in individual patients rather than whole populations and are an important part of evaluation and treatment decision making. Various nomograms have been developed in malignancies to predict and prognosticate clinical outcomes such as severity of disease, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. In prostate cancer, nomograms were developed for determining need for biopsy, disease course, need for adjuvant therapy, and outcomes. Most of these predictive nomograms were based on Caucasian populations. Prostate cancer is significantly affected by race, and Asian men have a significantly different racial and genetic susceptibility compared to Caucasians, raising the concern about the generalizability of these nomograms. There are very few studies that have evaluated the applicability and validity of the existing nomograms in in Asian men. Most have found significant differences in the performance in this population. Thus, relying on such nomograms for treating Asian men may not be appropriate and collaborative efforts are required within Asian countries to develop locally relevant nomograms.What Is Critical Appraisal?Critical appraisal is the process of systematically evaluating research studies to assess their validity, relevance, and trustworthiness. The goal is to determine whether a study’s results are credible and useful for clinical decision-making, research, or policy. This has become increasingly important as there has been a massive increase in the number of scientific journals and not all published research is of equal quality. Critical appraisal helps healthcare professionals avoid being misled by poor-quality studies, make evidence-based decisions and improve patient outcomes. The key purposes are to assess validity of the study and its results and determine applicability to the specific population. It involves assessing the study design, methodological quality, completeness of reporting, potential sources of bias and potential for misconduct. There are number of reporting guidelines that can be used for performing critical appraisal. Additionally, being aware of essential reporting standards and common problems with studies can help readers make informed decisions.Scientific Misconduct and PitfallsNo abstractExample of the “Ideal” AbstractNo Abstract
  • Kittinut KijvikaiThailand Speaker Robotic Surgery: Past, Present and Future PerspectivesMastering the Details: Tips and Tricks on Robotic Radical Cystectomy
  • Wei-Yu LinTaiwan Speaker Step-by-Step: Intra-Corporeal Orthotopic Bladder CreationIntra-corporeal orthotopic neobladder creation is a technically demanding yet feasible procedure performed following robotic radical cystectomy. Using a 40–50 cm segment of ileum, the bowel is isolated, detubularized along the antimesenteric border, and configured into a low-pressure reservoir. Urethro-ileal anastomosis is carefully performed to ensure a tension-free, watertight connection, followed by uretero-ileal anastomoses using the Wallace technique with ureteral stent placement. The intra-corporeal approach minimizes bowel handling, facilitates faster recovery, and preserves pelvic anatomy, offering potential advantages in continence and postoperative outcomes when performed by experienced robotic surgeons.
  • Noor Ashani Md YusoffMalaysia Speaker Technical Pearls: Node Dissection in Robotic CystectomyHighlight and Limitation in Urology Service in MalaysiaRobotic Pelvic LN Dissection: A critical Component of Bladder Cancer Surgery
  • Xu Zhang China Speaker From Console to Cloud: The Evolution of Robotic Telesurgery in Urology – Innovations, Trials, and Ethical FrontiersTelesurgery is an emerging branch of surgery that utilizes telecommunication technology and surgical robots to perform operations. It breaks the spatial constraints on the conduct of surgical procedures and represents a systematic innovation brought about by the intersection of new technologies and concepts such as robotic surgery, telecommunication, and artificial intelligence. It holds promise as a potential solution to the uneven distribution of medical resources. Currently, China's research in telesurgery has reached the forefront of the international stage. Building a high-quality disciplinary development ecosystem and a regional collaborative system for remote surgery will be the inevitable path to maintaining a leading position. Providing national-level project support for telesurgery, establishing a national-level joint innovation group, creating a regional medical consortium for remote surgery, and formulating legal norms and treatment guidelines will pave the way for the sustainable development of telesurgery in China. It is believed that with the strong support of the state, Chinese surgeons will seize the opportunity, lead the new wave of surgical development, integrate new telesurgery technologies into the national universal healthcare system, and benefit a large number of patients.
    Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan Speaker ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends, It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS). This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation. Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment. Materials and Methods We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration. Results Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups. Conclusions Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background: Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn. Material and Methods: We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months. Results: The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery. Conclusion: We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground: Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications. Objective: This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques. Methods: We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied. Results: Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible. Conclusion: The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency. Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques. Significance: This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
  • Ryoichi Shiroki Japan Speaker Surgical Robot-System hinotori in Urological Surgery: Clinical Applications and Future PotentialThe hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has been designed to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside. Equipped with four 8-axis robotic arms, providing smooth, highly articulated movements that mimic the human hand. In addition, docking-free design allows for a wide operative field around trocars, ensuring smooth workflows for surgeons and assistants. As a made-in-Japan system, it offers high adaptability to local clinical needs and faster implementation of user feedback. Since the first launch, more 90 systems have been installed for the clinical use, not only inside Japan but foreign countries such as Singapore and Malaysia. The first one was performed in December 2020 on prostatectomy. Since then, more than 100,000 cases performed, including urology GI surgery, gynecology and thoracic fields. In urological surgery, robot-assisted surgery has been widely and promptly accepted as a standard approach for the majority of major surgeries, including robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), partial nephrectomy (RAPN), radical nephrectomy (RARN), radical nephroureterectomy (RANU), and radical cystectomy (RARC), and has generally shown findings superior to those of conventional open and laparoscopic surgeries In conclusion, hinotori is a cutting-edge Japanese surgical robot already in use at many medical institutions. With strong performance across various surgical specialties and growing insurance coverage, it is expected to benefit even more patients as its technology continues to evolve and its global presence expands.Comparison of Various Current Surgical Robotic Systems - Nuances, Advantages, & DrawbacksIn the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical care in the majority of surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. We, Fujita, installed the four different kinds of robotic platform for clinical usage such as, daVinci Xi, SP, hinotori and Hugo. In this study, we want to analyze the perioperative outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and characterize the differences between four platforms. hinotori : The hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has a compact operation arm with eight axes of motion, one more than the DaVinci, leading to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside. DaVinci SP : The characteristic of the SP system can operate one 3D flexible camera and three forceps through a single port, and various surgical access is possible without the external interference of the arms. The various complicated procedures have been feasible such as NOTES or transoral surgery through the narrow space without the large wound, and retroperitoneal approach like the prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. SP system is expected to contribute to develop the high quality surgery with minimal invasiveness. Hugo : Hugo system (Medtronic) consists of an open-site console with two arm-controllers that are operated with a grip similar to a pistol. It also has a footswitch that controls the camera, energy source, and reserve arm. The system includes four separate arm carts, each with six joints to increase the range of motion. Additionally, it uses specific 3D glasses for head tracking technology. Despite a small case series, there seemed to need learning-curve to get familiar with systems in setting-up and surgical procedures in introductory-phase. However, all the surgical procedures were efficaciously and safely performed, resulting in the achievement of favorable perioperative outcomes surgically as well as oncologically. In conclusion, these new robots will lead to competition and reduce the costs of RAS and will contribute to an increase in use. Robotic-assisted surgery will become more common than laparoscopic surgery especially in the field of urology.
    Gang ZhuChina Speaker Enhancing Robotic Surgery with AI and Imaging Navigation: Bridging Precision and Efficiency
TICC - 1F 101D

15th August 2025

Time Session
08:30
10:00
  • Ho-Yee TiongSingapore Moderator Living kidney donation with AI - Augmented or ArtificialAt the National University Hospital, we have utilized AI to try improving our pre-operative and peri-operative management of our patients for donor nephrectomy. This presentation shares the benefit of the learning experience of using AI through a standardized procedure like donor nephrectomy.
    Tatsuo KawaiUnited States Speaker Overview and Recent Advancement of Renal Xenotransplantation(TBC)
  • Brian K. LeeUnited States Speaker Genetic Testing in the Evaluation of Recipient Candidates and Living Kidney DonorWith the advent of more affordable next generation sequencing with ever faster turnaround times, precision medicine has taken on a more prominent role in clinical practice. This has meant that when determining the most appropriate course of action when evaluating potential kidney transplant recipients, genetic ascertainment of the underlying cause of their ESKD/CKD has become an increasingly indispensable tool. At the same time, related living kidney donors, especially those who are young, and who may not have any manifestations of renal symptoms can now be genetically tested to reassure transplant professionals and donors and their families that they are unlikely to harbor a hereditary condition that could jeopardize their future renal function. And yet the interpretation of genetic testing results is not part of the regular nephrology/transplant curriculum, and many centers do not have readily accessible medical geneticists or genetic counselors at their disposal, making the appropriate triaging of recipient and donor candidates alike somewhat of a black box. Through this session, we hope to elucidate the tough decisions and triumphs that comes with recognizing both the powers and the limitations of using genetic tests in transplant recipient and donor evaluations. Non-Invasive Immune MonitoringThe success of kidney transplantation is dependent on the close monitoring of kidney function and the net immune status of the host recipient. Traditional biomarkers such as serum creatinine are unreliable at best, often lagging behind histologic evidence of anti-graft activity when protocol biopsies are performed which could jeopardize opportunities for clinicians to intervene timely. Surveillance renal allograft biopsies have been employed in an attempt to match clinical outcomes with histologic findings, but this invasive procedure could lead to bleeding complications and is time- and labor intensive. Better immune monitoring has recently become more widely adopted in transplant practice, and its introduction could allow closer follow-up of the recipient and shed light on the state of immune milieu.
  • Cheng-Kuang YangTaiwan Moderator Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Trying to Fit the Right Surgery to the Right PatientDefinitive treatment for localized prostate cancer included radical prostatectomy and radiation. Successful criteria of radical prostatectomy have to meet oncology control, not persistent PSA after surgery without salvage therapy. MRI imaging stage and PSA density are predictors for short‐term BCR after prostatectomy. NCCN‐defined high‐risk patients with a high initial PSA 28 density, imaging stage (T3aN0M0 and T3bN0M0), and 29 pathologic stage (any N1) had a higher risk of BCR when 30 compared with other patients with undetectable PSA, while 31 those with pathologic stage (T3bN0M0 or any N1) displayed 32 a higher risk of postoperatively detectable PSA. These find‐ 33 ings may help urologists to identify patients for whom active 34 therapeutic protocols are necessary.
    Alvin WeeUnited States Speaker How to Build Up a Strong Kidney Transplant Program with Continuing Growth?Transplantation is one of the most complex, highly regulated, multidisciplinary fields in medicine, requiring the coordination and dedication of a highly skilled and collaborative team. At this conference, we’re honored to share our journey—highlighting the challenges, milestones, and strategic innovations that have shaped our transplant program. Through intentional planning, data-driven practices, and a strong team culture, we’ve grown to become the leading transplant center in the nation, recognized for both volume and quality outcomes. Our hope is that by sharing our experience, we can contribute valuable insights to the transplant community and support others in advancing excellence in patient care. Robotic Kidney Transplantation: The Way to Go?!The utilization of robotics in urologic surgery continues to grow, offering enhanced precision, improved outcomes, and faster recovery times. In the field of kidney transplantation, robotic-assisted techniques are now gaining significant momentum. The Cleveland Clinic Main Campus has emerged as the largest single center performing robotic-assisted kidney transplants annually—not only in the United States but also worldwide. With this unparalleled experience, we are well positioned to share key advantages we have observed over traditional open surgical methods. As robotic technology continues to evolve, our experience reinforces its growing role in transforming the field of kidney transplantation and improving patient outcomes.
  • Tom LueUnited States Speaker Recent Advances in ED: Bridging Innovation and Clinical PracticeRecent Advances in ED: Translating Innovation to Patient Care Tom F. Lue, MD, ScD(Hon), FACS, University of California, San Francisco, USA Ischemic priapism and Peyronie’s disease are two longstanding challenges in urology. When not promptly and appropriately managed, both conditions frequently result in erectile dysfunction. This presentation will review the underlying pathophysiology of each condition and highlight recent innovations that have significantly advanced our clinical approach and improved patient outcomes. Ischemic Priapism Pathogenesis and Management of Ischemic Priapism Although ischemic priapism can result from a variety of underlying conditions, they all converge on a final common pathway: paralysis of the intracavernous smooth muscle, leading to veno-occlusion and cessation of arterial inflow. This vascular stasis causes tissue ischemia, which, if not promptly reversed, progresses to necrosis, fibrosis, and ultimately erectile dysfunction. When priapism is identified within 24 hours, initial management typically includes aspiration of the old cavernosal blood combined with intracavernosal injection of alpha-adrenergic agents such as diluted phenylephrine. These agents stimulate smooth muscle contraction, promoting restoration of venous outflow and arterial inflow. However, once priapism extends beyond 24 hours, prolonged ischemia leads to marked tissue edema, severe smooth muscle dysfunction, and thrombosis of subtunical venules. At this stage, the efficacy of alpha-adrenergic agents is greatly diminished or absent, and surgical intervention becomes necessary. Various shunting procedures have been described to re-establish cavernosal blood flow by diverting it through the glans, corpus spongiosum, dorsal vein, or saphenous vein. In some cases, intracavernous dilation procedures are employed to re-open the proximal-to-distal corporal channels and facilitate drainage through the shunt. These advanced measures aim to salvage erectile tissue and prevent long-term dysfunction. Why Do Many Shunting Procedures Fail? Within the body, exposed collagen acts as a key trigger for blood clotting. Shunting procedures create an opening in the tunica albuginea to divert blood flow toward the glans, corpus spongiosum, or the penile or saphenous veins. However, this procedure exposes collagen fibers in the tunica and surrounding injured erectile tissue, which initiates the coagulation cascade. As a result, blood clots can form within the shunt, causing its closure and leading to recurrence of priapism. Innovation: Peri-Shunting Antithrombotic Therapy Over the past decade, for priapism lasting more than 24 hours, we have routinely administered aspirin combined with low-dose heparin prior to shunting procedures— T-shunts, with or without intracavernous dilation. This is followed by a five-day regimen of aspirin and clopidogrel to maintain shunt patency during the critical post-ischemic hyperemia phase. Using this approach, we have effectively reduced the rate of priapism recurrence to approximately 10%. Peyronie’s disease Pathogenesis Peyronie’s disease (PD) results from a complex cascade of molecular, cellular, and structural changes that cause fibrosis—with or without calcification—in the tunica albuginea, septum, or intracavernous struts of the penis. These fibrotic plaques decrease the tunica’s elasticity, leading to penile curvature, indentation, hourglass deformity, or shortening during erection. The resulting biomechanical disruption, along with the psychological distress it may cause, can contribute to erectile dysfunction. Innovation-Enzyme-based Injection therapy Xiaflex (collagenase clostridium histolyticum) is an enzyme-based injection therapy approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Peyronie’s disease in December 2013. Administered via intralesional injection directly into the fibrotic plaque, Xiaflex contains enzymes that break down disorganized collagen and elastic fibers, gradually reducing and eliminating the plaque. However, injection alone typically does not produce significant correction of the deformity without a subsequent modeling procedure. This procedure—performed manually or with devices such as RestoreX, PeniMaster Pro, or Andropenis—serves as a tissue expansion tool to promote remodeling of the normal tunica, helping to restore penile length and girth. Over the past 11 years, the author has performed more than 11,000 Xiaflex injections and considers this approach superior to surgery for several reasons: (1) It eliminates plaques without creating new plaques, unlike surgical excision or incision with grafting; (2) It facilitates increases in penile length and girth through modeling, in contrast to the shortening often seen after plication procedures; (3) It avoids neurovascular damage and does not cause erectile dysfunction.
  • Geng-Long HsuTaiwan Speaker Penile Fibro-Voruilon Assembly and Venours Stripping Surgery for EDBackgrounds: Humans have existed on earth for 3000 centuries, so does penile fibro-vascular assembly, which is an exclusive milieu for applying Pascal's law if there is no veno-occlusive dysfunction (VOD), or older-termed venous leakage. The corpora cavernosa (CC), incorporated distal ligament, is the primary compartment for establishing bony rigidity. Despite extensive studies for centuries, the medieval illustration of penile fibro-vascular anatomy has prevailed in literature since 1519. Consequently, it has been unsuccessful in all derived penile reconstructive strategies, particularly the merit of penile venous surgery, which has been disputed since 1895, when Duncan introduced it in the United States. Recently, a penile fibro-vascular assembly was proven to be an independent compartment in the cardiovascular system. We sought to report on the male potency reconstructions, specifically the penile venous stripping for erection restoration, refined chronologically since 1985, in Taiwan. Methods: Reviewing a four-decade journey, reciprocating between penile fibrovascular anatomy and Taiwanese penile venous stripping surgery (PVSS) strategy, from the 1986 prototype to the USPTO patent version in August 2012, we reviewed a vast repository in our 3488 surgeries since 1986. Under acupuncture-assisted local anesthesia, the acupoints of Hegu (LI4), Shou San Li (LI10), and Waiguan (TE5) are chosen routinely. All patients received dual cavernosography in which a pilot cavernosograpy demonstrated the innovative, intriguing penile venous anatomy, a PGE-1 test in between, and a pharmaco-cavernosography documented a veno-occlusive dysfunction (VOD). Among them, 3488 PVS surgeries had been performed. Neither an electrocautery nor a suction apparatus is used. All surgeries were conducted on an ambulatory basis with acupuncture-assisted local anesthesia. PVSS entailed the venous stripping of a deep dorsal vein and a pair of cavernosal veins after every emissary vein was fixed firmly closest to the outer tunica albuginea with a 6-0 nylon suture. Meanwhile, segmental ligation was conducted on two pairs of para-arterial veins. Routinely, postoperative cavernosograms were obtained for comparison. The abridged 5-item version of the International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF-5) score system and the erection hardness scale (EHS) were used to confirm improvement in preoperative and postoperative follow-up via the INTERNET yearly. Statistically, the Wilcoxon signed rank test and Fisher's exact test were used as necessary. Results: The operation time is 4.7±1.4 hours, varied widely between 3.5 h and 7.5 h with a mean of 4.7h. , and the blood loss is 15.8±4.6 mL. There was a significant difference (both P<0.01) in preop. And postop. IIEF-5 and EHS scores (9.7±2.8 vs. 20.8±2.3; 1.7±0.6 vs. 3.2±0.2, respectively. Although the intracorporeal retention and erection quality improvement were profound unexceptionally, improved rate was defined as an IIEF-5 increasement of 3 scores out of 25 and EHS up warding at least one scale; accounting for 50.0 to 95.7%; however, the gratifying rate varies between 55.5% to 85.8% with available follow-up for longer than a decade. In the adolescent-onset impotence, natural coitus can be achieved in 3 out of the five patients. Discussion and conclusion: Given that refractory ED prompted most patients to seek our PVSS, it is noteworthy that PVSS appears to be beneficial to most ED patients of all ages. Particularly, with an ultimate understanding of penile fibrovascular assembly involving the erection veins and apagogical erection process through hemodynamic research via fresh and defrosted cadaveric penises, Taiwanese PVSS warrants spreading to young surgeons. Take-home message: The conventional penile anatomy is merely one circumferential layer model of tunica albuginea surrounding the corpora cavernosa (CC) and one deep dorsal vein draining corporeal blood; as evidenced by research, innovative terms such as erection-related veins, penile venous stripping surgery (PVSS), and penile fibro-vascular assembly are underpinned and implemented in Taiwan. Human penile fibrovascular assembly involves the fibrous bi-layered tunica albuginea model with a 360° inner circular and 300° outer coat surrounding the CC; the erection-related veins are one deep dorsal vein (DDV), two cavernosal veins (CVs), and four para-arterial veins. Each vein has emissaries connecting to the CC sinusoids. The relationship between DDV, CVs, and emissaries resembles that of rattan root nodes to a yam vine: multiple smaller yams can sprout if the root remains intact, which occurs at the expense of the main vine's ability to support a single giant yam; this agricultural principle guided the design of our PVSS approach. Taiwanese PVSS requires neither electrocautery nor suction apparatus. Although most of the medical community worldwide does not agree with it, PVSS is beneficial in correcting veno-occlusive dysfunction and has outstanding results. The traditional complications of irreversible penile numbness and deformity have been virtually negated with the venous ligation technique superseding venous cautery. Despite not being agreed upon in most of the medical community, penile venous stripping surgery is beneficial in correcting veno-occlusive dysfunction, with outstanding results. The traditional complications of irreversible penile numbness and deformity have been virtually negated with the venous ligation technique superseding venous cautery. Although many urological surgeons regard the PVSS surgery niche as unreachable, it is achievable, akin to the capability of performing microsurgery on a small rat. Taiwanese PVSS is likely the exclusive physiological way to ensure erection restoration and a natural way of glans expansion. So PVSS, which ought to decline AI assistance, should be shared with young surgeons. Key Words: cavernosal vein, erectile dysfunction, deep dorsal vein, para-arterial vein, veno-occulusive dysfunction, penile venous stripping surgery, penile fibro-vascular assembly, erection-related veins References: 1. Hsu, G. L., Chang, H. C., Molodysky, E., Hsu, C. Y., Tsai, M. H., Yin, J. H., & Chen, M. T. (2025). A detailed analysis of the penile fibro-vascular assembly. The journal of sexual medicine, 22(2), 225–234. https://doi.org/10.1093/jsxmed/qdae177 2. Cho-Hsing Chung, Ko-Shih Chang, Heng-Shuen Chen, Yi-Ying Hsieh, Yu-Hsiang Chang, Geng-Long Hsu, Mang-Hung Tsai, Jeff SC Chueh. Combining Erection Restoration and Factual Penile Enhancement Based on Revolutionary Penile Fibrovascular assembly. Journal Archivos Españoles de Urología, accepted 2025. 3. Cho-Hsing Chung, Heng-Shuen Chen, Yi-Ying Hsieh, Geng-Long Hsu, Cheng-Hsing Hsieh, Ta-Chin Lin, Jeff SC Chueh. Strategy for salvaging the shrinkage soft glans penis and impending prosthesis loss in patients with a penile implant: A case report. Journal Archivos Españoles de Urología, accepted, 2025. 4. Geng-Long Hsu: Physiological Approach to Penile Venous Stripping Surgical Procedure for Patients with Erectile Dysfunction (Patent No: US 8,240,313B2). http://www.google.com/patents/US20110271966 5. Chang KS, Chang YK, Chung CH, et al Emergent Penile Venous Stripping for Treating Adolescent Impotence. Life 2024, 14, 762. 6. Chang KS, Chung CH, Chang YK, et al., Coil Embolization Is Not Justified for Treating Patients with Veno-Occlusive Dysfunction: Case Series and Narrative Literature Review." Life (Basel, Switzerland) 2024; 14:911-23. https:// doi.org/10.3390/life14070911 7. Hsieh CH, Huang YP, Tsai MH, et al. Tunical Outer Layer Plays an Essential Role in Penile veno-occlusive Mechanism Evidenced from Electrocautery Effects to the Corpora Cavernosa in Defrosted Human Cadavers. Urology 2015; 86:1129-1136. 8. Hsu, G-L., & Lu, H-C. (2018). Penis Structure—Erection. In M. K. Skinner (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Reproduction. vol. 1, pp. 367–375. Academic Press: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.64603-2 9. Hsu GL, Hill JW, Hsieh CH, et al. Venous ligation: A novel strategy for glans enhancement in penile prosthesis implantation. BioMed Research International Volume 2014 (2014), Article ID 923171, 7 pages http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/923171 10. Hsu GL, Hung YP, Tsai MH, et al. Penile veins are the principal component in erectile rigidity: a study of penile venous stripping on defrosted human cadavers. J Androl 2012; 33:176-185. 11. Hsu, G-L. (2018). Erection Abnormality. In M. K. Skinner (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Reproduction. vol. 1, pp. 382–390. Academic Press: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.64374-X (Invited) 12. Hsu, G-L., & Liu, S-P. (2018). Penis Structure. In M. K. Skinner (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Reproduction. vol. 1, pp. 357–366. Academic Press: Elsevier. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-801238-3.64602-0 (Invited) 13. Hsieh CH, Huang YP, Tsai MH, et al., Tunical Outer Layer Plays an Essential Role in Penile veno-occlusive Mechanism Evidenced from Electrocautery Effects to the Corpora Cavernosa in Defrosted Human Cadavers. Urology, 2015, volume 86, issue 6, pages 1129-1136. 14. Hsieh CH, Chen CW, Hung Meng Huang, et al. Penile venous stripping surgery is a viable option for erectile dysfunction after unsuccessful vascular interventions. Clin. Pract. (2017) 14(1): 86-94. 15. Heng-Shuen Chen, Chu-Wen Fang, Raymond WM Tsai, Chih-Yuan Hsu, Geng-Long Hsu1, Hsiu-Chen Lu, Mang-Hung Tsai, Jeff SC Chueh. The Human Penile Fibro-vascular Assembly Requires the Integrity of Ten Fibro-ligaments. Life submitted, 2025.
  • William J. HuangTaiwan Speaker Male Infertility: Challenges and Opportunities in AsiaMale infertility contributes to nearly 50% of all infertility cases, with an increasing burden observed across Asia. In parallel, a dramatic decline in birth rates has emerged in several Asian countries—including South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore—reaching historically low total fertility rates (TFRs) of under 1.0. While multifactorial in nature, this demographic crisis underscores the urgent need to address all aspects of reproductive health, including the often-overlooked role of male infertility. Epidemiological data reveal significant regional disparities in the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of male infertility. Cultural stigma, limited andrology training, fragmented referral systems, and inadequate coverage of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have impeded timely diagnosis and intervention. Environmental exposures, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, occupational heat, and increased paternal age have all been linked to declining semen quality, as evidenced by longitudinal studies showing decreased sperm concentration and motility in several urban centers across Asia. Current diagnostic tools—including semen analysis, hormone profiling, genetic testing (e.g., Y-chromosome microdeletion, karyotyping), and imaging—enable better etiological categorization. Microsurgical sperm retrieval techniques such as mTESE have provided new hope for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, while ICSI and sperm cryopreservation have become increasingly utilized where available. Nevertheless, access remains inconsistent, particularly outside metropolitan regions. Recent integration of AI-based systems for semen evaluation, patient triage, and digital counseling offers promising strategies to improve care delivery, especially in under-resourced settings. However, data privacy, regulatory standards, and user trust continue to pose barriers to widespread implementation. Opportunities for systemic improvement include the development of regional male infertility registries, integration of andrology into national reproductive health frameworks, expansion of insurance coverage for fertility services, and public awareness campaigns to destigmatize male infertility. In light of Asia’s fertility decline, repositioning male reproductive health as a public health and demographic priority is essential for sustainable population policy and long-term healthcare planning. The Peri-Operative Care of MIST For Prostate HyperplasiaMinimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST), particularly UroLift and Rezūm, have transformed the treatment landscape for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), offering effective symptom relief with reduced morbidity and preservation of sexual function. However, optimal outcomes depend not only on procedural execution, but also on well-structured peri-operative care protocols encompassing pre-, intra-, and post-operative management. Pre-operative evaluation includes comprehensive assessment of prostate anatomy—especially size, shape, and presence of median lobe—via imaging (TRUS or cystoscopy) to determine candidacy. Careful patient selection is essential: UroLift is typically suited for prostates <80 cc without obstructive median lobes, while Rezūm accommodates broader anatomical variability but may have delayed symptom resolution. Baseline symptom scores (e.g., IPSS), uroflowmetry, and post-void residual volume establish functional benchmarks and guide patient counseling. Anesthesia planning must consider procedural setting and patient comorbidities. UroLift can often be performed under local anesthesia with light sedation, whereas Rezūm may require short general anesthesia or deeper sedation due to thermal discomfort. Appropriate selection reduces intraoperative stress and facilitates same-day discharge. Intraoperative care focuses on minimizing trauma and ensuring device precision. UroLift requires accurate deployment of implants to maintain lateral lobe retraction without compromising sphincter integrity. In Rezūm, the number and duration of vapor injections must be titrated based on lobe size and configuration to balance efficacy and tissue inflammation. Real-time visualization and standardized protocols reduce variability and improve safety. Post-operative management involves anticipating and controlling transient irritative symptoms, such as dysuria, urgency, and hematuria. Alpha-blockers and anti-inflammatory medications are commonly used for 3–7 days post-procedure. Catheterization strategies differ by technique: UroLift may avoid catheter use entirely, whereas Rezūm often requires 7-14 days of catheter drainage due to anticipated edema. Monitoring for urinary retention, UTI, or clot obstruction is critical during the early recovery phase. Follow-up care typically occurs at 2–4 weeks and includes reassessment of voiding function, symptom scores, and patient satisfaction. Reinforcement of realistic expectations is especially important with Rezūm, which may take 4–6 weeks to achieve peak efficacy. Longitudinal studies indicate sustained symptom relief and low retreatment rates when peri-operative care is standardized and patient education is emphasized. Adverse event profiles differ between techniques: UroLift is associated with less dysuria but higher retreatment rates in large prostates, while Rezūm presents higher rates of transient discomfort but favorable durability. Structured peri-operative care pathways—including patient education, standardized medication protocols, and clear complication management plans—enhance recovery, minimize adverse events, and improve overall clinical success.
TICC - 3F Banquet Hall
10:30
12:00
Kidney Transplant
  • Cheng-Kuang YangTaiwan Moderator Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Trying to Fit the Right Surgery to the Right PatientDefinitive treatment for localized prostate cancer included radical prostatectomy and radiation. Successful criteria of radical prostatectomy have to meet oncology control, not persistent PSA after surgery without salvage therapy. MRI imaging stage and PSA density are predictors for short‐term BCR after prostatectomy. NCCN‐defined high‐risk patients with a high initial PSA 28 density, imaging stage (T3aN0M0 and T3bN0M0), and 29 pathologic stage (any N1) had a higher risk of BCR when 30 compared with other patients with undetectable PSA, while 31 those with pathologic stage (T3bN0M0 or any N1) displayed 32 a higher risk of postoperatively detectable PSA. These find‐ 33 ings may help urologists to identify patients for whom active 34 therapeutic protocols are necessary.
    Sho-Mon WangTaiwan Moderator
  • Alvin WeeUnited States Speaker How to Build Up a Strong Kidney Transplant Program with Continuing Growth?Transplantation is one of the most complex, highly regulated, multidisciplinary fields in medicine, requiring the coordination and dedication of a highly skilled and collaborative team. At this conference, we’re honored to share our journey—highlighting the challenges, milestones, and strategic innovations that have shaped our transplant program. Through intentional planning, data-driven practices, and a strong team culture, we’ve grown to become the leading transplant center in the nation, recognized for both volume and quality outcomes. Our hope is that by sharing our experience, we can contribute valuable insights to the transplant community and support others in advancing excellence in patient care. Robotic Kidney Transplantation: The Way to Go?!The utilization of robotics in urologic surgery continues to grow, offering enhanced precision, improved outcomes, and faster recovery times. In the field of kidney transplantation, robotic-assisted techniques are now gaining significant momentum. The Cleveland Clinic Main Campus has emerged as the largest single center performing robotic-assisted kidney transplants annually—not only in the United States but also worldwide. With this unparalleled experience, we are well positioned to share key advantages we have observed over traditional open surgical methods. As robotic technology continues to evolve, our experience reinforces its growing role in transforming the field of kidney transplantation and improving patient outcomes.
  • Ho-Yee TiongSingapore Speaker Living kidney donation with AI - Augmented or ArtificialAt the National University Hospital, we have utilized AI to try improving our pre-operative and peri-operative management of our patients for donor nephrectomy. This presentation shares the benefit of the learning experience of using AI through a standardized procedure like donor nephrectomy.
  • Brian K. LeeUnited States Speaker Genetic Testing in the Evaluation of Recipient Candidates and Living Kidney DonorWith the advent of more affordable next generation sequencing with ever faster turnaround times, precision medicine has taken on a more prominent role in clinical practice. This has meant that when determining the most appropriate course of action when evaluating potential kidney transplant recipients, genetic ascertainment of the underlying cause of their ESKD/CKD has become an increasingly indispensable tool. At the same time, related living kidney donors, especially those who are young, and who may not have any manifestations of renal symptoms can now be genetically tested to reassure transplant professionals and donors and their families that they are unlikely to harbor a hereditary condition that could jeopardize their future renal function. And yet the interpretation of genetic testing results is not part of the regular nephrology/transplant curriculum, and many centers do not have readily accessible medical geneticists or genetic counselors at their disposal, making the appropriate triaging of recipient and donor candidates alike somewhat of a black box. Through this session, we hope to elucidate the tough decisions and triumphs that comes with recognizing both the powers and the limitations of using genetic tests in transplant recipient and donor evaluations. Non-Invasive Immune MonitoringThe success of kidney transplantation is dependent on the close monitoring of kidney function and the net immune status of the host recipient. Traditional biomarkers such as serum creatinine are unreliable at best, often lagging behind histologic evidence of anti-graft activity when protocol biopsies are performed which could jeopardize opportunities for clinicians to intervene timely. Surveillance renal allograft biopsies have been employed in an attempt to match clinical outcomes with histologic findings, but this invasive procedure could lead to bleeding complications and is time- and labor intensive. Better immune monitoring has recently become more widely adopted in transplant practice, and its introduction could allow closer follow-up of the recipient and shed light on the state of immune milieu.
TICC - 2F 201DE
13:30
15:00
Transplantation
Cheng-Kuang YangTaiwan Moderator Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Trying to Fit the Right Surgery to the Right PatientDefinitive treatment for localized prostate cancer included radical prostatectomy and radiation. Successful criteria of radical prostatectomy have to meet oncology control, not persistent PSA after surgery without salvage therapy. MRI imaging stage and PSA density are predictors for short‐term BCR after prostatectomy. NCCN‐defined high‐risk patients with a high initial PSA 28 density, imaging stage (T3aN0M0 and T3bN0M0), and 29 pathologic stage (any N1) had a higher risk of BCR when 30 compared with other patients with undetectable PSA, while 31 those with pathologic stage (T3bN0M0 or any N1) displayed 32 a higher risk of postoperatively detectable PSA. These find‐ 33 ings may help urologists to identify patients for whom active 34 therapeutic protocols are necessary.
Kuo-Jen LinTaiwan Moderator
TICC - 1F 102

16th August 2025

Time Session
13:30
15:00
Recent Advancements in Muscle-Invasive Urothelial Carcinoma
  • Cheng-Kuang YangTaiwan Speaker Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Trying to Fit the Right Surgery to the Right PatientDefinitive treatment for localized prostate cancer included radical prostatectomy and radiation. Successful criteria of radical prostatectomy have to meet oncology control, not persistent PSA after surgery without salvage therapy. MRI imaging stage and PSA density are predictors for short‐term BCR after prostatectomy. NCCN‐defined high‐risk patients with a high initial PSA 28 density, imaging stage (T3aN0M0 and T3bN0M0), and 29 pathologic stage (any N1) had a higher risk of BCR when 30 compared with other patients with undetectable PSA, while 31 those with pathologic stage (T3bN0M0 or any N1) displayed 32 a higher risk of postoperatively detectable PSA. These find‐ 33 ings may help urologists to identify patients for whom active 34 therapeutic protocols are necessary.
  • Cheng-Kuang YangTaiwan Speaker Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Trying to Fit the Right Surgery to the Right PatientDefinitive treatment for localized prostate cancer included radical prostatectomy and radiation. Successful criteria of radical prostatectomy have to meet oncology control, not persistent PSA after surgery without salvage therapy. MRI imaging stage and PSA density are predictors for short‐term BCR after prostatectomy. NCCN‐defined high‐risk patients with a high initial PSA 28 density, imaging stage (T3aN0M0 and T3bN0M0), and 29 pathologic stage (any N1) had a higher risk of BCR when 30 compared with other patients with undetectable PSA, while 31 those with pathologic stage (T3bN0M0 or any N1) displayed 32 a higher risk of postoperatively detectable PSA. These find‐ 33 ings may help urologists to identify patients for whom active 34 therapeutic protocols are necessary.
TICC - 1F 101C