Masatoshi EtoJapanModeratorCurrent Status & Future Perspective of Surgical Navigation in Robotic SurgeryRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard treatment for small renal cancer, however, the number of reports on the development of the image supported system and its effectiveness is small. The key point in the procedure of RAPN is to reliably identify renal artery in a space with few landmarks and to resect a tumor. To performe RAPN safely and reliably, we have already developed a surgical navigation specialized for RAPN, and published its usefulness in daVinci surgical systems. In this lecture, I would like to talk our recent projects updating our current navigation system. The first project focuses on 3D navigation using real-time forceps tracking. The second project is to develop an AI-based autonomous registration method for surgical navigation in RAPN. I hope that these 2 projects will further enhance the usefulness of our navigation system in RAPN.
Jeremy TeohHong Kong, ChinaModeratorTransurethral En Bloc Resection of Bladder Tumor: Where Are We Now?There is increasing evidence that transurethral en bloc resection of bladder tumour (ERBT) could lead to better peri-operative and oncological outcomes in patients with non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer. Modified approaches of ERBT have also been proposed to expand its indications for larger bladder tumours. The quality of resection is also the key for bladder-sparing treatment for muscle-invasive bladder cancer. We foresee an exciting journey ahead for ERBT, and as a urologist, we must embrace this novel technique for the best interest of our bladder cancer patients. To Publish or not to Publish? Navigating the path to academia in urologyDoing good science is the basis for technological advancement in healthcare. However, pursuing a path to academic in urology is often tough, stressful and frustrating. In this talk, I will share with you what I have learnt throughout my 15 years of research work. I will let you know what's the best and fastest way to become a globally renowned and successful researcher. Most importantly, I will explain what it takes to develop a great team and create a positive impact in people's lives. Believe in yourself! If I can do it, so can you.SIU Lecture: Role of MISTs in Male LUTS Surgical Management (Will TUR-P/ Laser Prostatectomy be Replaced?)Transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) is the current gold standard in treating patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Laser prostatectomy has also been used widely especially in patients who are on anticoagulants. However, both TURP and laser prostatectomy are associated with several problems including the need of spinal / general anaesthesia and the risk of male sexual dysfunction. In the past decade, we have witnessed the introduction of multiple new technologies including Rezum, Urolift, iTind and Aquablation. in this SIU lecture, we will discuss about the technical details, as well as the pros and cons of every new technology. We will also invite you to be our jury and decide whether TURP and laser prostatectomy will be replaced in the future. Novel Intravesical Therapeutics in the Evolving Landscape of NMIBCNon-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) is well known to be a difficult disease to manage, with a 1-year recurrence rate of up to 61% and 5-year recurrence rate of 78%. Despite the use of intravesical BCG therapy, NMIBC patients may still experience recurrence and develop what we call BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. Conventionally, we offer upfront radical cystectomy for patients with BCG-unresponsive NMIBC, however, this is an ultra-major surgery with significant risk of complications and could also lead to significant deterioration in quality of life in the long run. We are in urgent need for novel therapies to manage this difficult condition. In this lecture, we will discuss the evidence on the different novel intravesical therapies in treating BCG-unresponsive NMIBC. SIU Lecture: Role of MISTs in Male LUTS Surgical Management (Will TUR-P/ Laser Prostatectomy be Replaced?)
Rajeev KumarIndiaModeratorTroubleshooting in Endoscopic Stone Surgery: How to Handle Unexpected Challenges in RIRS and ECIRSProstate Cancer Nomograms and Their Application in Asian MenNomograms help to predict outcomes in individual patients rather than whole populations and are an important part of evaluation and treatment decision making. Various nomograms have been developed in malignancies to predict and prognosticate clinical outcomes such as severity of disease, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. In prostate cancer, nomograms were developed for determining need for biopsy, disease course, need for adjuvant therapy, and outcomes.
Most of these predictive nomograms were based on Caucasian populations. Prostate cancer is significantly affected by race, and Asian men have a significantly different racial and genetic susceptibility compared to Caucasians, raising the concern about the generalizability of these nomograms.
There are very few studies that have evaluated the applicability and validity of the existing nomograms in in Asian men. Most have found significant differences in the performance in this population. Thus, relying on such nomograms for treating Asian men may not be appropriate and collaborative efforts are required within Asian countries to develop locally relevant nomograms.What Is Critical Appraisal?Critical appraisal is the process of systematically evaluating research studies to assess their validity, relevance, and trustworthiness. The goal is to determine whether a study’s results are credible and useful for clinical decision-making, research, or policy. This has become increasingly important as there has been a massive increase in the number of scientific journals and not all published research is of equal quality. Critical appraisal helps healthcare professionals avoid being misled by poor-quality studies, make evidence-based decisions and improve patient outcomes.
The key purposes are to assess validity of the study and its results and determine applicability to the specific population. It involves assessing the study design, methodological quality, completeness of reporting, potential sources of bias and potential for misconduct.
There are number of reporting guidelines that can be used for performing critical appraisal. Additionally, being aware of essential reporting standards and common problems with studies can help readers make informed decisions.Scientific Misconduct and PitfallsNo abstractExample of the “Ideal” AbstractNo Abstract