|
10:30
12:00
|
-
Hammad Ather Pakistan
Speaker
Current Evidence Supporting Adjuvant and Neo-Adjuvant TreatmentThe Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (UTUC) is increasingly being considered as a genetic disorder. Following RNU, the IHC can detect a deficiency in mismatch repair proteins or microsatellite instability (MSI) using PCR. In the presence of MSI, it is necessary to undergo germline testing. High-grade UTUC is an aggressive cancer and is often associated with micrometastases, resulting in early recurrence and development of metastases. Risk classification and recognising more aggressive cancers in whom adjuvant or even neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be of benefit. One of the most crucial steps in considering patients for chemotherapy is the platinum eligibility, renal function (<30ml/min), functional status (ECOG >2) and comorbidities >2 grade are considered ineligible. There is good-quality evidence of improved survival for adjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients following RNU for pT2–T4 and/or pN+ disease. The 2025 EAU guidelines recommend discussing adjuvant nivolumab with PD-L1-positive patients unfit for, or who declined, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for ≥ pT3 and/or pN+ disease after previous RNU alone or ≥ypT2 and/or ypN+ disease after previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by RNU. However, the evidence supporting this recommendation is weak. Single intravesical chemotherapy is strongly recommended. There is currently no level 1 evidence supporting neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; however, non-randomised series have shown a decreased incidence of positive surgical margins, recurrence, and improved survival over RNU alone.Avoiding Complication in Orthotopic NeobladderIn most large series from Europe, approximately 1-2 of every 10 patients undergoing radical cystectomy have an orthotopic neobladder (ONB). Data is supporting ONB in terms of quality of life, cosmetics, and improved patient satisfaction. Early and late morbidity in up to 22% of patients is reported. The terminal ileum is the GI segment most often used for orthotopic bladder substitution. With ileo-ureteral anastomoses, there is UUT reflux, and renal functional deterioration is a concern. Various forms of UUT reflux protection, including a simple isoperistaltic tunnel, ileal intussusception, tapered ileal prolongation implanted subserosally, and direct (sub)mucosal or subserosal ureteral implantation, have been described. Superiority of one over the other is not proven. Urethral recurrence is a significant concern; therefore, patient selection must be optimal. Short-term complications are related to the GI tract, including atelectasis and metabolic acidosis. They are all preventable with standardised post-operative measures. The ERAS protocol is particularly useful in avoiding short-term complications and decreasing postoperative hospital stay, among other benefits. The key to success in preventing complications is meticulous patient selection and the implementation of preemptive measures to avoid common complications.Prostate Biopsy Technique: Current EvidenceOptimal prostate biopsy is critical in risk-stratifying patients for appropriate patient care. The traditional TRUS-guided biopsy is associated with UTI sepsis and other infectious complications. Recently, the use of the transperineal route has been advocated for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Biopsy is either systematic or targeted. There is evidence supporting the notion that MRI-targeted biopsy without systematic biopsy significantly reduces the over-diagnosis of low-risk disease, compared to systematic biopsy. This seems true even when systematic biopsies are indicated after risk stratification with the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator. EAU recommends performing prostate biopsy using the transperineal approach due to the low risk of infectious complications and better antibiotic stewardship. They also recommend using either target prophylaxis based on rectal swab or stool culture, or augmented prophylaxis (two or more different classes of antibiotics), for transrectal biopsy.
-
Vinod K.VIndia
Moderator
Testosterone Therapy: Implications for Cardiovascular Health Sexual Function Preservation in MIS for BPH
-
-
-
-
M. SivashankarSri Lanka
Speaker
Management of NMIBC during BCG Shortage EraDuring periods of Bacillus Calmette–Guérin (BCG) shortage, management of non muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) must be guided by risk stratification and resource optimization. Recent evidence supports reduced dosing (one third to half) rather than abbreviated schedules, with induction prioritized for high risk and carcinoma in situ cases. Alternative intravesical agents—mitomycin C (especially with chemohyperthermia or EMDA), gemcitabine, epirubicin, or sequential gemcitabine/docetaxel—are recommended when BCG is unavailable. In cases of incomplete BCG followed by chemotherapy, outcomes may be superior to chemotherapy alone. For high risk patients, upfront radical cystectomy should be considered when BCG is wholly unavailable. Future trials and supply diversification remain vital.
-
Athanasios PapatsorisGreece
Speaker
BCG Refractory Cancer: Current Status of Intravesical TreatmentRecommendations in Laser Use for the Treatment of Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma
-
-
Rajeev TPIndia
Moderator
Newer Advances in the Endourological Management of Stones – Have We Reached the Zenith
-
-
-
Hammad Ather Pakistan
Speaker
Current Evidence Supporting Adjuvant and Neo-Adjuvant TreatmentThe Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (UTUC) is increasingly being considered as a genetic disorder. Following RNU, the IHC can detect a deficiency in mismatch repair proteins or microsatellite instability (MSI) using PCR. In the presence of MSI, it is necessary to undergo germline testing. High-grade UTUC is an aggressive cancer and is often associated with micrometastases, resulting in early recurrence and development of metastases. Risk classification and recognising more aggressive cancers in whom adjuvant or even neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be of benefit. One of the most crucial steps in considering patients for chemotherapy is the platinum eligibility, renal function (<30ml/min), functional status (ECOG >2) and comorbidities >2 grade are considered ineligible. There is good-quality evidence of improved survival for adjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients following RNU for pT2–T4 and/or pN+ disease. The 2025 EAU guidelines recommend discussing adjuvant nivolumab with PD-L1-positive patients unfit for, or who declined, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for ≥ pT3 and/or pN+ disease after previous RNU alone or ≥ypT2 and/or ypN+ disease after previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by RNU. However, the evidence supporting this recommendation is weak. Single intravesical chemotherapy is strongly recommended. There is currently no level 1 evidence supporting neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; however, non-randomised series have shown a decreased incidence of positive surgical margins, recurrence, and improved survival over RNU alone.Avoiding Complication in Orthotopic NeobladderIn most large series from Europe, approximately 1-2 of every 10 patients undergoing radical cystectomy have an orthotopic neobladder (ONB). Data is supporting ONB in terms of quality of life, cosmetics, and improved patient satisfaction. Early and late morbidity in up to 22% of patients is reported. The terminal ileum is the GI segment most often used for orthotopic bladder substitution. With ileo-ureteral anastomoses, there is UUT reflux, and renal functional deterioration is a concern. Various forms of UUT reflux protection, including a simple isoperistaltic tunnel, ileal intussusception, tapered ileal prolongation implanted subserosally, and direct (sub)mucosal or subserosal ureteral implantation, have been described. Superiority of one over the other is not proven. Urethral recurrence is a significant concern; therefore, patient selection must be optimal. Short-term complications are related to the GI tract, including atelectasis and metabolic acidosis. They are all preventable with standardised post-operative measures. The ERAS protocol is particularly useful in avoiding short-term complications and decreasing postoperative hospital stay, among other benefits. The key to success in preventing complications is meticulous patient selection and the implementation of preemptive measures to avoid common complications.Prostate Biopsy Technique: Current EvidenceOptimal prostate biopsy is critical in risk-stratifying patients for appropriate patient care. The traditional TRUS-guided biopsy is associated with UTI sepsis and other infectious complications. Recently, the use of the transperineal route has been advocated for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Biopsy is either systematic or targeted. There is evidence supporting the notion that MRI-targeted biopsy without systematic biopsy significantly reduces the over-diagnosis of low-risk disease, compared to systematic biopsy. This seems true even when systematic biopsies are indicated after risk stratification with the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator. EAU recommends performing prostate biopsy using the transperineal approach due to the low risk of infectious complications and better antibiotic stewardship. They also recommend using either target prophylaxis based on rectal swab or stool culture, or augmented prophylaxis (two or more different classes of antibiotics), for transrectal biopsy.
-
-
-
TICC - 1F 101D
|
|
13:30
15:00
|
-
John DavisUnited States
Speaker
Open Surgery Training: Is It Necessary in the Era of Robotics?Open surgery training in the era of robotics may or may not be a training environment that urology has control of, given worldwide access to robotic or at least laparoscopic techniques and strong patient preference. There may be some applications where a given experienced urologist can prefer open over minimally invasive surgery (MIS), such as radical cystectomy, or indications possibly outside of MIS feasibility such as large renal tumors with caval thrombus. Specific to training and expertise, there are 3 principle features of surgical skills desired: 1) knowing ideal exposure, 2) recognition of surgical planes, and 3) knowing anatomy before it can be seen. Although some trainees may only see MIS for certain indications, open surgery may expedite the process. There are no human studies identified on the topic, but a skills lab study was instructive (Farah, J Surgical Education 2023) showing that interns with open and MIS training performed higher comparing pre-intern to post intern bootcamp skills. The benefits of a solid training pathway including open experience are to move trainees towards the faster-to-progress part of the learning curve such that the attending can offer a safe training environment while moving the case along efficiently.The Future of Surgical Skills Evaluation: What Is on Your Wish List?Surgical skills training vary significantly by region with some systems putting trainees on a timed set of years, while others apprentice trainees until meeting a threshold for skills. Early training assessments were basic timed events with qualitative scores (subject to strong attending selection for success). Trainees should experience and/or study the key pitfalls to avoid and performance goals. Surgical simulation can be highly useful, but tend to improve only certain skills and not full case needs. Updated simulation moves from digital to hands on surgical models and may move the needle towards human experience. Training can be augmented with descriptors of surgical gestures and measuring which ones are most effective. The experience for the trainee is often depicted as an "autonomy gap" whereby the training desires to have case control, possibly before they are ready. Progression can be measured by descriptors of performance from assistance through full performance without coaching. The next frontier will be artificial intelligence guided measurement where specific performances can be characterized and diagnosed for success. My ultimate wishlist would be for methods to correlate skills to outcomes, optimized curricula, and a specific pathway to correct underperformance.Tips and Tricks in Challenging Cases of Robotic Radical ProstatectomyThere are many specific challenges with robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) that can be described and illustrated--the most 5 common are 1) difficulty access, 2) obesity, 3) pubic arch interference, 4) anatomic challenges, and 5) reconstruction challenges. In this video sample, we demonstrate 2 challenges: obesity requiring a pelvic lymph node dissection and significant pelvic de-fatting to identify the proper surgical landmarks. Next a massive sized prostate that has had a partial transurethral resection--together presenting challenges with landmarks, a difficult bladder neck to diagnose, and final reconstruction challenges.
-
Vipul R. PatelUnited States
Speaker
Lessons from 20,000 Robotic Prostatectomies: A Global Expert’s PerspectiveTechnical Considerations for Large Prostates over 100gmsTelesurgery: The Future of Surgery
-
Simone CrivellaroUnited States
Speaker
Single-Port vs. Multi-Port Robotic Prostatectomy: Balancing Innovation, Precision, and OutcomesThe Application & Limitation of Urological SP SurgerySingle Port Retroperitoneal Partial NephrectomySingle Port Prostate Surgery
-
Ketan BadaniUnited States
Speaker
Expanding horizons: SP for complex RAPNThe Future of Urological Robotic SurgerySingle-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple or Large Renal TumorsHow to Standardize Training by AI-Learning from The Best Practice of Urological Robotic SurgerySP Partial Nephrectomy
-
Wenjie ZhongAustralia
Speaker
Emergency Undocking in Robotic Urology Surgery - Preparedness, Protocols, and PracticeIntroduction:
Robotic surgery has revolutionized urologic procedures, offering precision and minimally invasive benefits. However, the complexity of the robotic interface introduces the rare but potentially catastrophic need for emergency undocking - a rapid disengagement of the robotic system in response to patient or technical emergencies.
Objective:
To review the current best practices, protocols, and preparedness strategies for emergency undocking during robotic urologic surgery, with a focus on multidisciplinary coordination, training, and outcome optimization.
Methods:
A structured review of the literature was conducted, including case reports, institutional protocols, and guideline recommendations from leading urological societies (AUA, EAU). In addition, procedural algorithms and simulation-based training approaches were analyzed to assess their impact on team performance and patient safety.
Results:
Emergency undocking occurs in fewer than 0.1% of robotic cases but is associated with high morbidity if delays occur. Key indications include sudden hemodynamic collapse, cardiac arrest, airway compromise, and robotic system malfunction. Simulation training has been shown to improve undocking times by up to 35%. Effective response hinges on predefined roles, verbal cues, and practiced protocols. Institutions with regular team drills report faster response times and better outcomes in high-acuity scenarios.
Conclusion:
Although infrequent, emergency undocking represents a critical moment in robotic surgery that demands rapid, coordinated team action. Implementing standardized protocols, reinforcing multidisciplinary simulations, and fostering a culture of readiness can significantly improve patient safety and surgical outcomes.
-
Yen-Chuan OuTaiwan
Speaker
ARUS–PRUS Partnership Ceremony: A New Chapter in Asia Robotic Urology CollaborationDear colleagues and friends,
It’s a great honor to witness the signing of this partnership between the Asian Robotic Urology Society (ARUS) and the Philippines Robotic Urology Society (PRUS).
This marks the beginning of a new chapter in regional collaboration—one that emphasizes shared training, joint research, and mutual support to advance robotic urology across Asia. PRUS brings energy, expertise, and vision to this partnership, and ARUS is proud to walk alongside you as we work toward higher standards and better outcomes for our patients. Let us move forward together—with unity, purpose, and innovation.
Congratulations to both ARUS and PRUS!Aquablation Revolutionizing BPH Treatment: A New Era of Minimally Invasive Therapy-Tungs' Taichung Metroharbor Hospital ExperienceIntroduction
Aquablation is a waterjet ablation therapy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) that has gained significant attention. While its efficacy, durability, and safety have been established across various prostate sizes (30–150 mL), local data on its efficacy, safety, and learning curve in Taiwan remain limited. Our team have been performed 85 cases between March 2024 and July 2025. This lecture presents the learning curve observed in the first 50 patients who underwent Aquablation for BPH, highlighting its role in revolutionizing BPH treatment.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective review of 50 consecutive patients who underwent Aquablation between March 2024 and February 2025, dividing them into two groups: Group I (first 25 cases) and Group II (subsequent 25 cases). Assessments included IPSS, QoL, uroflowmetry parameters (voiding volume, Qmax, Qmean, PVR), operative time, hemoglobin drop, Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2 complications, hospital stay, and urethral catheter duration.
Results
Patients in Group II were younger and had smaller prostates. Aquablation was successfully performed in all cases. IPSS, QoL, voiding volume, Qmax, and Qmean improved significantly and were sustained for three months, while PVR improved only in Group I. Operative time was significantly shorter in Group II, and hemoglobin drop was greater in Group I. Complication rates, hospital stay, and catheter duration were similar between groups.
Conclusions
Aquablation provided significant and immediate improvements in voiding parameters and symptoms, with sustained PVR benefits in larger prostates. Surgeon proficiency improved after 25 cases. Overall, Aquablation proved safe and effective, even in an unselected patient population. Aquablation represents a promising advancement that could transform the therapeutic landscape for BPH—particularly if costs are reduced.Experience of 100 Consecutive Hugo Robotic Radical ProstatectomiesIntroduction and background:
Dr. Ou’ surgical team of Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital performed the first Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy on May 9, 2023. In 2023, we published the results of the first series of 12 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies performed. In 2024, we published a comparison of 30 Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies and 30 Da Vinci robotic radical prostatectomies. Professor Ou is the Hugo robotic arm instructor recognized by Medtronic. Many Southeast Asian doctors come to this Hospital to observe the surgery and learn.
Material and Methods:
We prospectively collected data for retrospective analysis and statistics from May 9, 2023 to April 30, 2025, performing 100 consecutive Hugo robotic radical prostatectomies. We compared the surgical results of 1-50 cases (group 1) and 51-100 cases (group 2). The data analyzed included basic information, age, risk of anesthesia, BMI , prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score grade. The two groups were compared in terms of surgical difficulty, receipt of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, obesity, prostate volume >70 g, prostate protrusion more than 1 cm into the bladder neck, previous transurethral resection of prostate, history of abdominal surgery, extensive pelvic lymphadenectomy, salvage radical prostatectomy, and time from biopsy to radical prostatectomy less than 6 weeks. The two groups were compared in terms of robotic console time, blood loss, blood transfusion rate, and surgical complications. We compared the two groups in terms of postoperative pathological staging and grade, the proportion of tumor, and the proportion of urinary control at one month and three months.
Results:
The study showed that the age of patients in the second group was slightly higher, but the statistical p value was 0.058, which did not reach statistical difference. The second group of patients had significantly higher rates of stage III, stage IV, lymph node and bone oligometastasis, with a p value of 0.021. The rate of neoadjuvant hormonal therapy received by the second group was 16 percent, which was statistically significant compared with 2 percent of the first group (p = 0.021). The rates of other surgical difficulty factors were the same between the two groups. The average blood loss of patients in the second group was 156 CC, which was significantly less than the 208 CC in the first group. The operation time and surgical complications were comparable between the two groups. The cancer volume of the second group of patients was significantly reduced compared with that of the first group (3.30±2.93 versus 5.09±5.24, p value=0.049). The reason was that more patients in the second group received neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, which significantly reduced the cancer. Both groups of patients had very good urinary control after surgery.
Conclusion:
We conclude that Hugo robotic radical prostatectomy is an effective and feasible method with extremely low complications and good recovery of urinary control function after surgery. After the experience of the first 50 operations, the surgeon will choose patients with higher difficulty, especially those receiving neoadjuvant hormone therapy, to perform the operation.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical ProstatectomyBackground:
Robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has become a preferred surgical approach for localized prostate cancer due to its minimally invasive nature and precision. However, the preservation of urinary continence and sexual function remains a significant postoperative challenge. Traditional outcomes have focused heavily on oncological safety. Yet, contemporary perspectives emphasize a more holistic view—embodied in the concept of the “Pentafecta,” which includes continence, potency, negative surgical margins, biochemical recurrence-free survival, and absence of perioperative complications.
Objective:
This presentation introduces a comprehensive and integrative approach aimed at maximizing functional outcomes—particularly urinary continence and erectile function—through a modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under regional hypothermia, supplemented with real-time nerve imaging, neurovascular preservation strategies, and biological enhancement techniques.
Methods:
We present data and experience from Tungs’ Taichung MetroHarbor Hospital (TTMHH), including a series of 3780 robotic procedures performed between December 2005 and July 2025. Among these, 100 cases were completed using the Hugo™ RAS system and 21 with the da Vinci SP™ platform. Our modified technique builds upon Dr. Richard Gaston’s pubovesical complex-sparing method, with the addition of localized hypothermia (24°C), near-infrared fluorescence (NIRF) imaging with indocyanine green (ICG), and application of dehydrated human amnion/chorion membrane (dHACM). In selected cases, nerve grafting with Axogen® technology was applied.
Results:
Initial results indicate a significantly improved early return of continence (95% by 16 weeks) and promising erectile function recovery, particularly in patients who received adjunctive therapies such as phosphodiesterase inhibitors or vacuum erection devices. The precision afforded by robotic technology enabled preservation of
prostate capsular arteries and accessory pudendal arteries. Localized hypothermia contributed to reduced tissue edema, minimized neural trauma, and improved nerve recovery. The use of ICG-NIRF allowed real-time identification of critical vascular landmarks, enhancing nerve-sparing accuracy. Preliminary analysis suggests our technique is both feasible and reproducible.
Conclusion:
The modified pubovesical complex-sparing RARP under hypothermia, augmented with vascular imaging and biologic materials, offers a promising paradigm for functional preservation in prostate cancer surgery. This total solution approach not only protects neurovascular integrity but also accelerates recovery of continence and potency.
Continued accumulation of clinical cases and controlled comparative studies are warranted to further validate the efficacy and long-term benefits of these techniques.
Significance:
This strategy reflects a patient-centered evolution in robotic prostate surgery, merging surgical innovation with anatomical preservation and technological augmentation. It represents an epic collaboration of surgical precision, team-based care, and thoughtful application of biomedical advances to improve quality of life outcomes in prostate
cancer patients.Total Solution of Maintenance of Urinary and Sex Function during Robotic Radical Prostatectomy
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall
|
|
13:30
15:00
|
-
Hammad Ather Pakistan
Moderator
Current Evidence Supporting Adjuvant and Neo-Adjuvant TreatmentThe Upper Tract Urothelial Cancer (UTUC) is increasingly being considered as a genetic disorder. Following RNU, the IHC can detect a deficiency in mismatch repair proteins or microsatellite instability (MSI) using PCR. In the presence of MSI, it is necessary to undergo germline testing. High-grade UTUC is an aggressive cancer and is often associated with micrometastases, resulting in early recurrence and development of metastases. Risk classification and recognising more aggressive cancers in whom adjuvant or even neoadjuvant chemotherapy may be of benefit. One of the most crucial steps in considering patients for chemotherapy is the platinum eligibility, renal function (<30ml/min), functional status (ECOG >2) and comorbidities >2 grade are considered ineligible. There is good-quality evidence of improved survival for adjuvant chemotherapy in eligible patients following RNU for pT2–T4 and/or pN+ disease. The 2025 EAU guidelines recommend discussing adjuvant nivolumab with PD-L1-positive patients unfit for, or who declined, platinum-based adjuvant chemotherapy for ≥ pT3 and/or pN+ disease after previous RNU alone or ≥ypT2 and/or ypN+ disease after previous neoadjuvant chemotherapy, followed by RNU. However, the evidence supporting this recommendation is weak. Single intravesical chemotherapy is strongly recommended. There is currently no level 1 evidence supporting neo-adjuvant chemotherapy; however, non-randomised series have shown a decreased incidence of positive surgical margins, recurrence, and improved survival over RNU alone.Avoiding Complication in Orthotopic NeobladderIn most large series from Europe, approximately 1-2 of every 10 patients undergoing radical cystectomy have an orthotopic neobladder (ONB). Data is supporting ONB in terms of quality of life, cosmetics, and improved patient satisfaction. Early and late morbidity in up to 22% of patients is reported. The terminal ileum is the GI segment most often used for orthotopic bladder substitution. With ileo-ureteral anastomoses, there is UUT reflux, and renal functional deterioration is a concern. Various forms of UUT reflux protection, including a simple isoperistaltic tunnel, ileal intussusception, tapered ileal prolongation implanted subserosally, and direct (sub)mucosal or subserosal ureteral implantation, have been described. Superiority of one over the other is not proven. Urethral recurrence is a significant concern; therefore, patient selection must be optimal. Short-term complications are related to the GI tract, including atelectasis and metabolic acidosis. They are all preventable with standardised post-operative measures. The ERAS protocol is particularly useful in avoiding short-term complications and decreasing postoperative hospital stay, among other benefits. The key to success in preventing complications is meticulous patient selection and the implementation of preemptive measures to avoid common complications.Prostate Biopsy Technique: Current EvidenceOptimal prostate biopsy is critical in risk-stratifying patients for appropriate patient care. The traditional TRUS-guided biopsy is associated with UTI sepsis and other infectious complications. Recently, the use of the transperineal route has been advocated for the diagnosis of prostate cancer. Biopsy is either systematic or targeted. There is evidence supporting the notion that MRI-targeted biopsy without systematic biopsy significantly reduces the over-diagnosis of low-risk disease, compared to systematic biopsy. This seems true even when systematic biopsies are indicated after risk stratification with the Rotterdam Prostate Cancer Risk Calculator. EAU recommends performing prostate biopsy using the transperineal approach due to the low risk of infectious complications and better antibiotic stewardship. They also recommend using either target prophylaxis based on rectal swab or stool culture, or augmented prophylaxis (two or more different classes of antibiotics), for transrectal biopsy.
-
-
Vinod K.VIndia
Speaker
Testosterone Therapy: Implications for Cardiovascular Health Sexual Function Preservation in MIS for BPH
-
-
-
-
Michael WongSingapore
Moderator
Introduction to Asia School of UrologyAsian School of Urology 2022-2026 – New initiatives
Dr Michael YC Wong
Principal Director of ASU 2022-2026
President Endourological Society and WCET 2026
Introduction
Asian School of Urology (ASU) officially started in 1999 with the appointment of her first director Prof Pichai Bunyaratavej from Thailand (1999-2002) Subsequent directors were Dato Dr Rohan Malek from Malaysia (2002-2006) Prof Foo Keong Tatt from Singapore (2006-2010) Prof Rainy Umbas from Indonesia (2010-2014 ) and Prof Shin Egawa from Japan ( 2014-2022 ).
One of the highlights of the ASU in the early days were the organization of several workshops outside of UAA congress by three active sub-specialty sections of UAA namely Asian society of Endourology (over 16 workshops held from 1998-2008), Asian Society of Female Urology and Asia-Pacific society of Uro-Oncology. Other subspecialty sections were subsequently introduced and have matured very well including Asian Society of UTI and STI, Asian-Pacific Society of Andrological and Reconstructive Urology Surgeons.
In the last 8 years, ASU has seen tremendous growth under the steady leadership of Prof Shin Egawa with introduction of UAA lecturers at national Meetings and further maturation of the subspecialty sections of UAA e.g., Conversion of Asian society of endourology to Asian Robotic Urological Society to reflect the growth and development of UAA. During the past 8 years, ASU-South-East Asia section has also managed to organize 15 physical workshops and 4 webinars outside of UAA congress.
The Growth Trajectory for the next 4 years 2022-2026
There are many areas where ASU can grow further. Bearing in mind our limited resources and our excellent relationships with the world urological leaders at this point in our history.
There are three areas which I will focus on. Please remember that ASU is always open to other new initiatives as we must stay relevant to our Asian urological community.
1. Lasting and strong Relationships
1.1 AUA. Over a dish of chili crab with AUA secretary general Gopal Badlani, we explored the common desire to elevate Asian Urology and strengthen UAA Family. This led to our first joint UAA-AUA residency course at UAA Singapore 2016. After successful completion, a MOU was signed at AUA 2017 with Richard Babayan, Manoj Monga, Allen Chiu and myself in attendance. The AURC at UAA Hong Kong under Prof Eddie Chan was the result of this signed MOU. We are extremely grateful for the generosity of AUA for this program. What may not be obvious is that Gopal Badlani, Manoj Monga, John Denstedt and I served as faculty and board directors at WCE. We will sign the extension MOU in 2023 for another three years.
1.2 EAU. We have a very successful UAA-EAU Youth program since UAA Thailand 2012. This has been the work of several UAA senior members. From 2023, we are exploring joint webinars with EAU to build on this relationship.
1.3 SIU and WCE. We will further explore options based on available resources and manpower. Joint Webinar are planned for early 2026
2. Education Platform for Asian Urology Residents
From 2023, we will continue to grow our relationship with BJUI. BJUI has developed a world class online learning platform with tremendous investments since 2013. This platform is called BJUI Knowledge. ASU will reach out to all Asian residents via their national urological association president and secretary to encourage every resident to sign up for a free access to more than 420 interactive 30-minute modules covering the whole urology syllabus suitable for learning, exit exams and recertification exams. I am personally involved in developing all modules under Endourology and urolithiasis Section and have been associate editor since May 2013. The modest aim is for at least 10 residents per country to sign up by UAA 2023. We will report progress at each UAA council meeting. Pls see attached information and if there are any questions pls email me personally at email@drmichaelwong.com
3. Re-Strategize Training cum fellowship sites for ASU.
3.1 In the past we have always talked about the possibility about training sites for UAA and ASU. It has always been a difficult task due to financial and multiple logistics issues.
3.2 What can we do that is possible? Let us consider two options in the next 4 years.
3.3 For the last 6 years a group of Asian urologists started AUGTEG to design and provide two-day surgical training which includes lectures as well as dry and wet lab to develop surgical skills. AUSTEG has direct access to physical training centres in Thailand, South Korea, and China.
ASU will work with AUGTEC to pool resources since we are the same people working on both sides e.g., Anthony Ng (chairman of AUSTEG) Michael Wong (vice chairman) Eddie Chan (treasurer). AUGTEG is registered in HK.
3.4 The second option is to recognise elected university or training Asian centres to allow an attachment for young urologist post residency in a flexible format. ASU will recognise officially these sites as endorsed by UAA. At UAA 2025 , several potential ASU/UAA fellowship sites directors will be presenting their programmes to kickstart this initiative
4. In conclusion, ASU will continue to grow and serve the Asian Urological Community. The above initiatives are only the beginning of a next chapter. Can you contribute your ideas and current available resources for this purpose? If you can, Pls email me personally at email@drmichaelwong.com
Which Position is the Best for PCNL in 2025?With tremendous advances in both technique and technology , the MIS approach to staghorn calculi has evolved significantly over the last 30 years.
It is timely to review all the landmark articles on patient positioning as this ultimately determines renal access which in turn plays a major role in stone free rates. We will gain much insight as we debate and attempt to answer the question of which position is best in 2026!
-
-
-
Sasikumar SubramaniamSri Lanka
Speaker
Post Priapism Penile Prosthesis: What and WhenIschemic priapism remains a urological emergency with devastating consequences when not promptly and effectively managed. Among its most feared sequelae is corporal fibrosis leading to irreversible erectile dysfunction. In such cases, timely insertion of a penile prosthesis is often the only viable option to restore sexual function and preserve penile length. This presentation explores the complex decision-making framework surrounding penile prosthesis implantation following priapism.
We will review the current evidence on timing—emergent versus delayed insertion—highlighting the anatomical and surgical challenges posed by fibrotic corporal bodies. The discussion will cover prosthesis type selection, intraoperative considerations, and outcomes data from recent case series and cohort studies. Additionally, we will examine the risks of infection, erosion, and mechanical failure in the post-priapism cohort, comparing them to standard ED populations.
-
Sanjay KulkarniIndia
Speaker
12 cm Peno-Bulbar Stricture due to Lichen SclerosusPan Urethroplasty with Kulkarni technique, bilateral buccaneers mucosa grafts or spiral prepucial graft technique.Oral Mucosa and Beyond: Tissue Substitutes in Urethroplasty
-
-
Rajeev TPIndia
Speaker
Newer Advances in the Endourological Management of Stones – Have We Reached the Zenith
TICC - 1F 101D
|
