Reinaldi Situmorang

Reinaldi Situmorang is a dedicated and driven medical professional with a strong passion for improving healthcare delivery through leadership and service. He currently serves as a Kidney Transplant Consultant and Pediatric Urology Consultant at Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo Hospital, where he also holds key roles as Head of the Integrated Executive Service and Vice Chair of the Organ and Tissue Transplant Team. In addition, he is a clinical teacher at the Faculty of Medicine, University of Indonesia. After completing his urology residency at the University of Indonesia in 2014, Reinaldi Situmorang pursued a PhD in transplant immunobiology at the Newcastle upon Tyne Institute of Transplantation, United Kingdom, graduating in 2018. With a particular interest in kidney transplantation, pediatric urology, and hospital management, Reinaldi Situmorang is committed to advancing both clinical excellence and organizational effectiveness. Believing in the power of meaningful work, Reinaldi Situmorang continually hones leadership and communication skills to contribute to impactful, patient-centered care and systemic health improvements.

15th August 2025

Time Session
10:30
12:00
Transplant
Kidney Transplant
  • Kidney Transplant
    Cheng-Kuang YangTaiwan Moderator Robotic Radical Prostatectomy: Trying to Fit the Right Surgery to the Right PatientDefinitive treatment for localized prostate cancer included radical prostatectomy and radiation. Successful criteria of radical prostatectomy have to meet oncology control, not persistent PSA after surgery without salvage therapy. MRI imaging stage and PSA density are predictors for short‐term BCR after prostatectomy. NCCN‐defined high‐risk patients with a high initial PSA 28 density, imaging stage (T3aN0M0 and T3bN0M0), and 29 pathologic stage (any N1) had a higher risk of BCR when 30 compared with other patients with undetectable PSA, while 31 those with pathologic stage (T3bN0M0 or any N1) displayed 32 a higher risk of postoperatively detectable PSA. These find‐ 33 ings may help urologists to identify patients for whom active 34 therapeutic protocols are necessary.
    Reinaldi SitumorangIndonesia Moderator
    Sho-Mon WangTaiwan Moderator
  • Robotic Kidney Transplantation: The Way to Go?!
    Alvin WeeUnited States Speaker How to Build Up a Strong Kidney Transplant Program with Continuing Growth?Transplantation is one of the most complex, highly regulated, multidisciplinary fields in medicine, requiring the coordination and dedication of a highly skilled and collaborative team. At this conference, we’re honored to share our journey—highlighting the challenges, milestones, and strategic innovations that have shaped our transplant program. Through intentional planning, data-driven practices, and a strong team culture, we’ve grown to become the leading transplant center in the nation, recognized for both volume and quality outcomes. Our hope is that by sharing our experience, we can contribute valuable insights to the transplant community and support others in advancing excellence in patient care. Robotic Kidney Transplantation: The Way to Go?!The utilization of robotics in urologic surgery continues to grow, offering enhanced precision, improved outcomes, and faster recovery times. In the field of kidney transplantation, robotic-assisted techniques are now gaining significant momentum. The Cleveland Clinic Main Campus has emerged as the largest single center performing robotic-assisted kidney transplants annually—not only in the United States but also worldwide. With this unparalleled experience, we are well positioned to share key advantages we have observed over traditional open surgical methods. As robotic technology continues to evolve, our experience reinforces its growing role in transforming the field of kidney transplantation and improving patient outcomes.
  • Living Kidney Donation with AI - Augmented or Artificial
    Ho-Yee TiongSingapore Speaker Living kidney donation with AI - Augmented or ArtificialAt the National University Hospital, we have utilized AI to try improving our pre-operative and peri-operative management of our patients for donor nephrectomy. This presentation shares the benefit of the learning experience of using AI through a standardized procedure like donor nephrectomy.
  • Non-Invasive Immune Monitoring
    Brian K. LeeUnited States Speaker Genetic Testing in the Evaluation of Recipient Candidates and Living Kidney DonorWith the advent of more affordable next generation sequencing with ever faster turnaround times, precision medicine has taken on a more prominent role in clinical practice. This has meant that when determining the most appropriate course of action when evaluating potential kidney transplant recipients, genetic ascertainment of the underlying cause of their ESKD/CKD has become an increasingly indispensable tool. At the same time, related living kidney donors, especially those who are young, and who may not have any manifestations of renal symptoms can now be genetically tested to reassure transplant professionals and donors and their families that they are unlikely to harbor a hereditary condition that could jeopardize their future renal function. And yet the interpretation of genetic testing results is not part of the regular nephrology/transplant curriculum, and many centers do not have readily accessible medical geneticists or genetic counselors at their disposal, making the appropriate triaging of recipient and donor candidates alike somewhat of a black box. Through this session, we hope to elucidate the tough decisions and triumphs that comes with recognizing both the powers and the limitations of using genetic tests in transplant recipient and donor evaluations. Non-Invasive Immune MonitoringThe success of kidney transplantation is dependent on the close monitoring of kidney function and the net immune status of the host recipient. Traditional biomarkers such as serum creatinine are unreliable at best, often lagging behind histologic evidence of anti-graft activity when protocol biopsies are performed which could jeopardize opportunities for clinicians to intervene timely. Surveillance renal allograft biopsies have been employed in an attempt to match clinical outcomes with histologic findings, but this invasive procedure could lead to bleeding complications and is time- and labor intensive. Better immune monitoring has recently become more widely adopted in transplant practice, and its introduction could allow closer follow-up of the recipient and shed light on the state of immune milieu.
  • Kidney Donation Issues between Disparities, Culture and Laws in Asia
    Hao-Chung HoTaiwan Speaker
  • Discussion
TICC - 2F 201DE
15:30
17:00
Free Paper 【Podium】 (11)
Pediatric Urology
Reinaldi SitumorangIndonesia Moderator
Shang-Jen ChangTaiwan Moderator Which Surgical Treatment is Best for UPJO in Infants: Open, Laparoscopic, Robotic AssistedAbstract Ureteropelvic junction obstruction (UPJO) in infants is a condition that can significantly impair renal function and requires timely surgical intervention when certain criteria are met, such as decreased split renal function, poor drainage on diuretic renography, or recurrent urinary tract infections. The three main surgical approaches for treating UPJO are open pyeloplasty (OP), laparoscopic pyeloplasty (LP), and robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty (RALP). Each technique has its own benefits and limitations, especially when applied to infants. Minimally invasive surgery (MIS), including LP and RALP, has gained popularity in pediatric urology due to advantages such as shorter hospital stays, reduced postoperative pain, faster recovery, and better cosmetic outcomes. However, the small working space in infants, the steep learning curve, and higher costs are significant limitations. In particular, the utility of MIS in infants remains controversial due to undefined benefits and technical challenges, including limited space for trocar placement and difficulty in intracorporeal suturing. Current guidelines from the European Association of Urology (EAU) indicate that while RALP is considered the gold standard for older pediatric patients, its role in infants remains less defined due to anatomical and logistical constraints. Open surgery continues to be the mainstay for infantile UPJO due to its well-established success rate and lower cost. Several studies have addressed the learning curve associated with these techniques. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty requires about 30 cases for a surgeon to achieve proficiency, while RALP demands approximately 18–31 cases depending on the metrics used. Simulation-based training, dry labs, and multicenter collaboration are proposed solutions to accelerate skill acquisition and ensure patient safety. Cost is another critical consideration. Although RALP generally incurs higher upfront costs, especially in low-volume centers, innovations such as magnetic stents have helped offset some of these expenses by eliminating the need for anesthesia during stent removal. Moreover, the availability of pediatric-specific robotic instruments remains limited and necessitates ongoing development to fully support MIS in smaller patients. In conclusion, while RALP is increasingly recognized as the standard for pediatric UPJO, its application in infants should be considered selectively, depending on surgeon experience, institutional resources, and patient anatomy. Open pyeloplasty remains a safe and effective option, particularly in very young children. Advances in surgical training, cost reduction strategies, and instrument development will be key to expanding the use of minimally invasive techniques in this population.
TICC - 1F 102