Chi-Ping Huang

Dr. Chi-Ping Huang worked as the director of the Department of Urology in CMUH. His specialties include the diagnosis and treatment of urological malignancy (such as prostate cancer, kidney cancer, bladder cancer, and ureter cancer), minimally invasive surgery, and kidney transplantation. Dr. Huang has many experiences in performing surgeries using the daVinCi robotic surgery system and has accumulated over thousands cases. He had received training courses of robotic-surgery at the Ohio State University Medical Center in the United States. He also had training courses of kidney transplantation at the Tokyo Women's Medical University Hospital in Japan. He is also skilled in performing minimally invasive surgery for benign prostatic hyperplasia and cell immunotherapy for urological cancers.

15th August 2025

Time Session
13:30
15:00
Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Siros JitpraphaiThailand Speaker RCC and IVC ThrombectomyRCC and IVC thrombus Siros Jitpraphai Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, THAILAND Abstract Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus represents a complex surgical challenge, with an incidence of venous involvement in 4-10% of cases. This case report demonstrates the successful surgical management of a 58-year-old female patient with a large left-sided renal mass and IVC thrombus. The patient presented with gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a 10 cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma (Fuhrman nuclear grade 3) extending into the renal vein and IVC. Recognizing the complexity of the case, a multidisciplinary approach was employed, involving urological and hepatobiliary surgical teams. The comprehensive treatment strategy included an open radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. The surgical technique was meticulously planned and executed, with several key considerations. Preoperative imaging was crucial in determining the exact level of thrombus, allowing for precise surgical planning. The procedure emphasized careful vascular control and en-bloc tumor removal, with intraoperative ultrasound used to ensure accurate thrombus localization. Surgical teams worked collaboratively to minimize potential complications and maximize surgical success. Operatively, the procedure was substantial, with an estimated blood loss of 900 mL and a total operative time of 5 hours. The patient required two days of postoperative intensive care and was discharged from the hospital seven days after the surgery. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with no lymph node metastasis detected and positive tumor thrombus. Importantly, surgical margins were found to be free of tumor. Follow-up evaluations have been encouraging, with no signs of tumor recurrence observed during regular intervals. This case illustrates the critical importance of a systematic surgical approach, precise technical execution, and comprehensive multidisciplinary management in successfully treating RCC with IVC thrombus. It provides valuable insights into the complex surgical management of this challenging condition, potentially offering guidance for similar cases in the future. Keyword: RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma), IVC Thrombus, Thrombectomy, Surgical Technique, Multidisciplinary Management Highlight: RCC with IVC thrombus is a complex surgical challenge affecting 4-10% of cases. Successful management requires meticulous preoperative imaging, multidisciplinary team approach, and precise surgical technique. With careful planning and execution, 45-70% of patients can be cured through radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in Complex and Difficult Tumor Location
  • Surya Prakash VaddiIndia Speaker Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Immune TherapyRobotic Partial Nephrectomy in Tumors with High Renal Score
  • Brian Sze-ho HoHong Kong, China Speaker Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Making Things Easier
  • Po-Hung LinTaiwan Speaker Robotic Prostatectomy Using da Vinci SP SystemIn this semi-live section I will demonstrate the steps of extraperitoneal-approach radical prostatectomy using DAVINCI SP system.How to Make the Best Decision with Systemic Therapy Sequence in Respective of Genetic AnalysisRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a biologically heterogeneous disease driven by a limited set of convergent pathways that together shape oncogenesis, immune evasion, and therapeutic response. Across clear-cell RCC (ccRCC), recurrent alterations include VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2, mapping onto five dominant axes: hypoxia signaling (VHL–HIF), PI3K/AKT/mTOR, chromatin remodeling, cell-cycle control, and metabolic rewiring. These lesions variably interact—e.g., mTORC1 enhances HIF translation—creating therapeutic opportunities (VEGF tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, HIF-2α inhibition, mTOR blockade) and constraints (adaptive resistance via metabolic plasticity). While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations have improved outcomes in metastatic RCC, robust predictive biomarkers remain elusive. Tumor mutational burden is typically low and noninformative; PD-L1 shows assay- and context-dependent utility; PBRM1 and BAP1 are more prognostic than predictive. Emerging signals include angiogenic versus T-effector/myeloid transcriptional signatures, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid histology as a surrogate of immune-inflamed state, and host factors such as HLA genotype and gut microbiome composition. Liquid-biopsy modalities (ctDNA and methylome profiling) and spatial/single-cell atlases reveal intratumoral heterogeneity, T-cell exclusion niches, and myeloid programs (e.g., TREM2⁺ macrophages) linked to recurrence or ICI benefit. Early data support metabolism-targeted strategies (e.g., glutaminase inhibition) and rational combinations co-targeting angiogenesis, hypoxia signaling, and immune checkpoints; however, toxicity management and resistance evolution require prospective, biomarker-integrated trials. A clinical schema that pairs baseline multi-omic and microenvironmental profiling with adaptive surveillance (serial liquid biopsies, functional imaging) can lead to dynamically select among ICI–ICI, ICI–TKI, targeted, and experimental regimens. Robotic Prostatectomy Using da Vinci SP System
  • Seong Il SeoKorea (Republic of) Speaker Comparison of Remal Function between Radiofrequency Ablation versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Patial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Mass in Elderly PatientsComparison of renal function between radiofrequency ablation versus robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal mass in elderly patients Jiwoong Yu, Seongil Seo Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center The incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) in patients ≥75 years has increased up to 30-fold [J Urol 2014]. In this age group, treatment should balance cancer control and renal function preservation. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are two main options. RAPN offers excellent cancer control but requires general anesthesia and ischemia, which may pose risks in older patients. RFA is less invasive, avoids vascular clamping, and is often preferred for high-risk patients, as supported by EAU and AUA guidelines. RFA generally preserves renal function better [Front Oncol 2022], though outcomes vary by technique. At our center, RFA under general anesthesia with wide safety margins may compromise parenchymal preservation. While both approaches show favorable cancer control, RFA has a slightly higher recurrence rate. Pantelidou et al. reported 6 recurrences in 63 RFA cases vs. 1 in 63 RAPN cases [Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016], and Park et al. reported 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 95.2% in RFA vs. 100% in RAPN [Eur Radiol 2018]. NCCN guidelines note that RFA may require repeat treatment to match surgical outcomes. Our institutional matched analysis (63 RAPN vs. 63 RFA) showed RFS of 100% vs. 95.2% (p = 0.029), and immediate eGFR preservation of 91.7% vs. 86.8% [Eur Radiol 2018;28:2979–2985]. A subsequent analysis of older patients presented at AUA 2024 included 137 patients aged ≥75, the rate of ≥25% eGFR decline at one year was 28.6% for RFA vs. 2.0% for RAPN (HR 11.3, p = 0.002), with 4 recurrences in RFA and none in RAPN. In conclusion, both RFA and RAPN are viable options for elderly patients with small renal masses. RFA is less invasive but may carry a slightly higher risk of recurrence and, depending on institutional technique, some degree of renal function loss. Treatment should be individualized based on tumor anatomy, patient condition, and institutional expertise.
  • Steven L. ChangUnited States Speaker The Progression Landscape of Diagnostic and Treatment Options for Kidney CancerPros and Cons in the daVinci SP System Applications in Urological Surgeries
TICC - 2F 201BC
15:30
17:00
Oncology RCC (A)
Cheryn SongKorea (Republic of) Moderator Assistance of the AI during RAPN - Surgical Navigation to Outcome PredictionArtificial Intelligence (AI) has deeply infiltrated many, if not every, aspects of our lives - both professional and ordinary corners. In medicine, it seems that any research dealing with large amounts of data has to employ AI in one way or another - from radiomics and radiogenomics to drug developments and simulations. In managing patients with renal tumors, majority of which now present with localized, small masses, I have focused on developing a tool to help establish a plan preoperatively and navigate throughout the surgery, in real-time with the help of the AI. Using kidney dynamic CT scans of 100 patients undergoing robot-assisted partial nephrectomy, software was developed to render a 3-dimensional image of the kidney harboring the tumor along with several other tools to enhance visualization of the lesion. Scans from an additional 30 patients were used to test for performance and validate the software. Before surgery, main renal pedicles, tumor location with respect to the major hilar vasculature, important landmarks including the calyces and branches of the vessels can be studied from all angles; tumor shape especially when it is not a perfect sphere can be visually presented and the excision of the tumor with desired margin thickness can be simulated to see what vital structures come into contact. Connected to the surgeon console through the TilePro® screen, it was designed to aid a urologic surgeon from before surgery as well as throughout the procedure as needed. In a phase I feasibility trial investigating the efficacy of the system, we confirmed that the integration of the 3D navigation system into RAPN was both feasible and safe, providing enhanced anatomical information while maintaining a consistent level of operative risk. The use of navigation system resulted in reduced renal parenchymal volume resected, suggesting potential benefits in renal function preservation. Subsequent phase 2 trial investigating accuracy of the reconstruction and a multicenter randomized controlled trial with surgeons with varying degrees of experience are underway to validate the benefits. On the other hand, the fundamental question as to best manage the small renal masses – i.e. indications for partial nephrectomies - still harbor some gray areas: is partial nephrectomy at all possible situations the best? In a given patient how will oncological and renal functional outcome differ between partial and radical nephrectomy? Previous statistical methods could only calculate risk ratios in the best-matched cohorts and the issue of counterfactual remained. Using demographic and tumor descriptive parameters of 1,448 patients with pT1N0M0 RCC patients from three academic centers, causal inference was modeled using a double machine learning algorithm to predict progression-free survival and eGFR at five years according to each surgical method: partial and radical nephrectomy. We identified significant factors and their contribution to the outcomes of interest to be included in the model. Selecting a model with the highest performance among various machine learning models for each outcome, an online interface was constructed. External validation confirmed the robustness, presenting AUROC of 0.758, AUPRC of 0.200 with XGBoost model for recurrence, and RMSE of 15.9 with GBM model for eGFR. By presenting numerical predictions of oncologic and functional outcomes associated with partial and radical nephrectomy in a given patient, our model facilitates individualized, evidence-based clinical decision-making.
TICC - 1F 101D