| Time |
Session |
|
|
10:30
12:00
|
-
Ryoichi Shiroki Japan
Speaker
Surgical Robot-System hinotori in Urological Surgery: Clinical Applications and Future PotentialThe hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has been designed to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside. Equipped with four 8-axis robotic arms, providing smooth, highly articulated movements that mimic the human hand. In addition, docking-free design allows for a wide operative field around trocars, ensuring smooth workflows for surgeons and assistants. As a made-in-Japan system, it offers high adaptability to local clinical needs and faster implementation of user feedback.
Since the first launch, more 90 systems have been installed for the clinical use, not only inside Japan but foreign countries such as Singapore and Malaysia. The first one was performed in December 2020 on prostatectomy. Since then, more than 100,000 cases performed, including urology GI surgery, gynecology and thoracic fields. In urological surgery, robot-assisted surgery has been widely and promptly accepted as a standard approach for the majority of major surgeries, including robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), partial nephrectomy (RAPN), radical nephrectomy (RARN), radical nephroureterectomy (RANU), and radical cystectomy (RARC), and has generally shown findings superior to those of conventional open and laparoscopic surgeries
In conclusion, hinotori is a cutting-edge Japanese surgical robot already in use at many medical institutions. With strong performance across various surgical specialties and growing insurance coverage, it is expected to benefit even more patients as its technology continues to evolve and its global presence expands.Comparison of Various Current Surgical Robotic Systems - Nuances, Advantages, & DrawbacksIn the field of urology, robotic surgery has gained rapid and wide acceptance as a standard surgical care in the majority of surgeries over the last decade. To date, the da Vinci surgical system has been the dominant platform in robotic surgery; however, several newly developed robotic systems have recently been introduced in routine clinical practice. We, Fujita, installed the four different kinds of robotic platform for clinical usage such as, daVinci Xi, SP, hinotori and Hugo. In this study, we want to analyze the perioperative outcomes of robotic radical prostatectomy (RARP) and characterize the differences between four platforms.
hinotori : The hinotori system was developed by Medicaroid, the partnership between Kawasaki, a leader in the industrial robots, and Sysmex, with its abundant expertise and networks in advanced medicine, released the first made-in-Japan RAS in 2020. The hinotori has a compact operation arm with eight axes of motion, one more than the DaVinci, leading to reduce interference between arms and the surgeon at bedside.
DaVinci SP : The characteristic of the SP system can operate one 3D flexible camera and three forceps through a single port, and various surgical access is possible without the external interference of the arms. The various complicated procedures have been feasible such as NOTES or transoral surgery through the narrow space without the large wound, and retroperitoneal approach like the prostatectomy and partial nephrectomy. SP system is expected to contribute to develop the high quality surgery with minimal invasiveness.
Hugo : Hugo system (Medtronic) consists of an open-site console with two arm-controllers that are operated with a grip similar to a pistol. It also has a footswitch that controls the camera, energy source, and reserve arm. The system includes four separate arm carts, each with six joints to increase the range of motion. Additionally, it uses specific 3D glasses for head tracking technology.
Despite a small case series, there seemed to need learning-curve to get familiar with systems in setting-up and surgical procedures in introductory-phase. However, all the surgical procedures were efficaciously and safely performed, resulting in the achievement of favorable perioperative outcomes surgically as well as oncologically.
In conclusion, these new robots will lead to competition and reduce the costs of RAS and will contribute to an increase in use. Robotic-assisted surgery will become more common than laparoscopic surgery especially in the field of urology.
-
Michael WongSingapore
Moderator
Introduction to Asia School of UrologyAsian School of Urology 2022-2026 – New initiatives
Dr Michael YC Wong
Principal Director of ASU 2022-2026
President Endourological Society and WCET 2026
Introduction
Asian School of Urology (ASU) officially started in 1999 with the appointment of her first director Prof Pichai Bunyaratavej from Thailand (1999-2002) Subsequent directors were Dato Dr Rohan Malek from Malaysia (2002-2006) Prof Foo Keong Tatt from Singapore (2006-2010) Prof Rainy Umbas from Indonesia (2010-2014 ) and Prof Shin Egawa from Japan ( 2014-2022 ).
One of the highlights of the ASU in the early days were the organization of several workshops outside of UAA congress by three active sub-specialty sections of UAA namely Asian society of Endourology (over 16 workshops held from 1998-2008), Asian Society of Female Urology and Asia-Pacific society of Uro-Oncology. Other subspecialty sections were subsequently introduced and have matured very well including Asian Society of UTI and STI, Asian-Pacific Society of Andrological and Reconstructive Urology Surgeons.
In the last 8 years, ASU has seen tremendous growth under the steady leadership of Prof Shin Egawa with introduction of UAA lecturers at national Meetings and further maturation of the subspecialty sections of UAA e.g., Conversion of Asian society of endourology to Asian Robotic Urological Society to reflect the growth and development of UAA. During the past 8 years, ASU-South-East Asia section has also managed to organize 15 physical workshops and 4 webinars outside of UAA congress.
The Growth Trajectory for the next 4 years 2022-2026
There are many areas where ASU can grow further. Bearing in mind our limited resources and our excellent relationships with the world urological leaders at this point in our history.
There are three areas which I will focus on. Please remember that ASU is always open to other new initiatives as we must stay relevant to our Asian urological community.
1. Lasting and strong Relationships
1.1 AUA. Over a dish of chili crab with AUA secretary general Gopal Badlani, we explored the common desire to elevate Asian Urology and strengthen UAA Family. This led to our first joint UAA-AUA residency course at UAA Singapore 2016. After successful completion, a MOU was signed at AUA 2017 with Richard Babayan, Manoj Monga, Allen Chiu and myself in attendance. The AURC at UAA Hong Kong under Prof Eddie Chan was the result of this signed MOU. We are extremely grateful for the generosity of AUA for this program. What may not be obvious is that Gopal Badlani, Manoj Monga, John Denstedt and I served as faculty and board directors at WCE. We will sign the extension MOU in 2023 for another three years.
1.2 EAU. We have a very successful UAA-EAU Youth program since UAA Thailand 2012. This has been the work of several UAA senior members. From 2023, we are exploring joint webinars with EAU to build on this relationship.
1.3 SIU and WCE. We will further explore options based on available resources and manpower. Joint Webinar are planned for early 2026
2. Education Platform for Asian Urology Residents
From 2023, we will continue to grow our relationship with BJUI. BJUI has developed a world class online learning platform with tremendous investments since 2013. This platform is called BJUI Knowledge. ASU will reach out to all Asian residents via their national urological association president and secretary to encourage every resident to sign up for a free access to more than 420 interactive 30-minute modules covering the whole urology syllabus suitable for learning, exit exams and recertification exams. I am personally involved in developing all modules under Endourology and urolithiasis Section and have been associate editor since May 2013. The modest aim is for at least 10 residents per country to sign up by UAA 2023. We will report progress at each UAA council meeting. Pls see attached information and if there are any questions pls email me personally at email@drmichaelwong.com
3. Re-Strategize Training cum fellowship sites for ASU.
3.1 In the past we have always talked about the possibility about training sites for UAA and ASU. It has always been a difficult task due to financial and multiple logistics issues.
3.2 What can we do that is possible? Let us consider two options in the next 4 years.
3.3 For the last 6 years a group of Asian urologists started AUGTEG to design and provide two-day surgical training which includes lectures as well as dry and wet lab to develop surgical skills. AUSTEG has direct access to physical training centres in Thailand, South Korea, and China.
ASU will work with AUGTEC to pool resources since we are the same people working on both sides e.g., Anthony Ng (chairman of AUSTEG) Michael Wong (vice chairman) Eddie Chan (treasurer). AUGTEG is registered in HK.
3.4 The second option is to recognise elected university or training Asian centres to allow an attachment for young urologist post residency in a flexible format. ASU will recognise officially these sites as endorsed by UAA. At UAA 2025 , several potential ASU/UAA fellowship sites directors will be presenting their programmes to kickstart this initiative
4. In conclusion, ASU will continue to grow and serve the Asian Urological Community. The above initiatives are only the beginning of a next chapter. Can you contribute your ideas and current available resources for this purpose? If you can, Pls email me personally at email@drmichaelwong.com
Which Position is the Best for PCNL in 2025?With tremendous advances in both technique and technology , the MIS approach to staghorn calculi has evolved significantly over the last 30 years.
It is timely to review all the landmark articles on patient positioning as this ultimately determines renal access which in turn plays a major role in stone free rates. We will gain much insight as we debate and attempt to answer the question of which position is best in 2026!
Ketan BadaniUnited States
Speaker
Expanding horizons: SP for complex RAPNThe Future of Urological Robotic SurgerySingle-Port Robotic Partial Nephrectomy for Multiple or Large Renal TumorsHow to Standardize Training by AI-Learning from The Best Practice of Urological Robotic SurgerySP Partial Nephrectomy
-
Rajeev KumarIndia
Moderator
Troubleshooting in Endoscopic Stone Surgery: How to Handle Unexpected Challenges in RIRS and ECIRSProstate Cancer Nomograms and Their Application in Asian MenNomograms help to predict outcomes in individual patients rather than whole populations and are an important part of evaluation and treatment decision making. Various nomograms have been developed in malignancies to predict and prognosticate clinical outcomes such as severity of disease, overall survival, and recurrence-free survival. In prostate cancer, nomograms were developed for determining need for biopsy, disease course, need for adjuvant therapy, and outcomes.
Most of these predictive nomograms were based on Caucasian populations. Prostate cancer is significantly affected by race, and Asian men have a significantly different racial and genetic susceptibility compared to Caucasians, raising the concern about the generalizability of these nomograms.
There are very few studies that have evaluated the applicability and validity of the existing nomograms in in Asian men. Most have found significant differences in the performance in this population. Thus, relying on such nomograms for treating Asian men may not be appropriate and collaborative efforts are required within Asian countries to develop locally relevant nomograms.What Is Critical Appraisal?Critical appraisal is the process of systematically evaluating research studies to assess their validity, relevance, and trustworthiness. The goal is to determine whether a study’s results are credible and useful for clinical decision-making, research, or policy. This has become increasingly important as there has been a massive increase in the number of scientific journals and not all published research is of equal quality. Critical appraisal helps healthcare professionals avoid being misled by poor-quality studies, make evidence-based decisions and improve patient outcomes.
The key purposes are to assess validity of the study and its results and determine applicability to the specific population. It involves assessing the study design, methodological quality, completeness of reporting, potential sources of bias and potential for misconduct.
There are number of reporting guidelines that can be used for performing critical appraisal. Additionally, being aware of essential reporting standards and common problems with studies can help readers make informed decisions.Scientific Misconduct and PitfallsNo abstractExample of the “Ideal” AbstractNo Abstract
Simone CrivellaroUnited States
Speaker
Single-Port vs. Multi-Port Robotic Prostatectomy: Balancing Innovation, Precision, and OutcomesThe Application & Limitation of Urological SP SurgerySingle Port Retroperitoneal Partial NephrectomySingle Port Prostate Surgery
-
Masatoshi EtoJapan
Speaker
Current Status & Future Perspective of Surgical Navigation in Robotic SurgeryRobot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) is a standard treatment for small renal cancer, however, the number of reports on the development of the image supported system and its effectiveness is small. The key point in the procedure of RAPN is to reliably identify renal artery in a space with few landmarks and to resect a tumor. To performe RAPN safely and reliably, we have already developed a surgical navigation specialized for RAPN, and published its usefulness in daVinci surgical systems. In this lecture, I would like to talk our recent projects updating our current navigation system. The first project focuses on 3D navigation using real-time forceps tracking. The second project is to develop an AI-based autonomous registration method for surgical navigation in RAPN. I hope that these 2 projects will further enhance the usefulness of our navigation system in RAPN.
-
Chi-Fai NgHong Kong, China
Speaker
Novel Robotic Surgery PlatformsOver the past decades, robotic surgery has become an essential approach in urological care. The recent blooming of different robotic platforms, in particular in Asian countries, has helped popularize robotic surgery in less developed countries. The introduction of robotic technology in endoluminal surgery has also helped to open up opportunities to further improve endourology. In the future, the incorporation of AI in robotic systems will help upgrade the standard of care in urology.
-
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall
|
Exploring Urology Service Challenges in ASEAN
-
Noor Ashani Md YusoffMalaysia
Moderator
Technical Pearls: Node Dissection in Robotic CystectomyHighlight and Limitation in Urology Service in MalaysiaRobotic Pelvic LN Dissection: A critical Component of Bladder Cancer Surgery
-
Noor Ashani Md YusoffMalaysia
Speaker
Technical Pearls: Node Dissection in Robotic CystectomyHighlight and Limitation in Urology Service in MalaysiaRobotic Pelvic LN Dissection: A critical Component of Bladder Cancer Surgery
-
-
-
Ferry SafriadiIndonesia
Speaker
Highlights and Limitations in Urology Service in Indonesia
Urological services in Indonesia have made substantial progress over the past decades, yet remain challenged by disparities in access, distribution of specialists, and healthcare infrastructure. Highlighting the strengths, Indonesia has seen a growth in the number of trained urologists, expansion of academic urology programs, and increasing adoption of minimally invasive surgical techniques in tertiary hospitals. Additionally, collaboration among national professional associations has promoted standardized clinical guidelines and continuing medical education. However, significant limitations persist. The geographical complexity of the Indonesian archipelago contributes to unequal access to urological care, particularly in remote and rural regions where specialist services are scarce. Limited availability of advanced diagnostic and therapeutic equipment in secondary healthcare centers further hinders timely and optimal management of urological diseases. Health financing constraints, particularly in the context of the national health insurance system (JKN), also impact the sustainability and quality of services. Moreover, research productivity and data-driven policy development in urology remain limited, affecting national efforts to address the burden of urological conditions such as prostate cancer, urolithiasis, and chronic kidney disease. Bridging these gaps requires a coordinated national strategy that includes workforce redistribution, infrastructure investment, telemedicine integration, and strengthened academic research networks. This abstract underscores both the achievements and ongoing challenges in Indonesia’s urology services, serving as a basis for future policy reform and capacity building.
-
Sotheavy VongCambodia
Speaker
Uro-Laparoscopic Activities in Cambodia at Kantha Bopha Children’s Hospital since 2018Background:
This is one of the largest series of laparoscopy reported in children. Laparoscopy also call minimally invasive procedure, bandied surgery or keyhole surgery is a modern surgical technique in neonates, children and adult. Laparoscopic surgery includes operations within the abdominal or pelvic cavities and in urology to perform surgery on the kidneys, bladder and other urinary tract organs.
There are a number of advantages to the patient with laparoscopic surgery versus an exploratory laparotomy. These include less pain due to smaller incision, reduced hemorrhaging, shorter hospital stays and faster recovery time.
The key element is the use of a uro-laparoscope, along fiber optic cable system that allows viewing of the affected area by snaking the cable from a more distant but more easily accessible location.
Purpose:
This study is to carried out surgical techniques, to investigate the feasibility and outcome of URO-LAPAROSCOPIC and to evaluate the postoperative results at various ages. The management should aim to reduce pain, hemorrhaging and shorter recovery time with a minimum of complications and an improvement of life quality. To clarify the roles of various treatment strategies for surgery we reviewed our experience at Kantha Bopha Children’s Hospitals, Phnom Penh, Cambodia.
Materials & Methods:
We are analyzed children diagnosed as endoscopic between the periods of 2018-2024 who presented to our hospital. 2366 children were diagnosed to have problem in Thoracic, Urology and Visceral who underwent the surgical managements were investigated at Kantha Bopha Children Hospital IV, Phnom Penh, Cambodia, during the period of 7 years between 1st January 2018 to 31st Decembre 2024.
Results:
The outcome of all our patients after surgery was in good results with a nice comfortable lifestyle postoperative. The duration of hospital stays and recovery time is faster than open surgery, from 7-10 days to 2-4 days. The median age at presentation was 7 years, with range of 1month to 15year-old. Male children constituted 1538 cases (65%) and Female 828 cases (35%). There are 12 cases (0.5%) of laparoscopic surgery that had complications postoperative.
The 1107 cases of Laparoscopic surgery were includes: pyeloplasty (Anderson-Hynes) in pelvic ureteric junction obstruction (PUJO) (98 cases), Heminephrectomy (28 cases), Nephrectomy (12 cases), Pyelolithotomy, Ureterolithotomy, Appendicitis, Peritonitis, Choledochal cyst, Gastrostomy (bezoars), Biopsy, Ovarian cyst or teratoma, Lung cystic emphysema. Moreover, in endourology surgery, 1259 cases with in Posterior urethral valve (56 cases), Ureterocele (41 cases) and Meatus ureteral stenosis (145 cases).
Conclusion:
Technological advancements have produced smaller endoscopic instruments with higher quality imaging that allow endoscopic surgeons to perform precise dissection with minimal bleeding to treat the patients in order to achieve the best outcome with more comfortable.
Therefore, we are trying our best on the endoscopy procedures in our country to improve the technical and the quality postoperative lifestyle to all the children.
Keywords: Advantages of Uro-laparoscopy, Anderson-Hynes’s procedure (PUJO), Posterior urethral valve
-
Phone MyintMyanmar
Speaker
Enhancement of Endourological Services in MyanmarMyanmar urological practice has been conducting since 1960s as a branch of surgical faculty and separate urology department was established in 1980s at Yangon General Hospital, a teaching hospital under university of medicine 1, Myanmar. Endourology procedures were started afterwards including Cystoscopic procedures (TUR, endoscopic stone crushing and etc:). PCNL and semirigid ureteroscopic procedures were established in early 1990s and were expanding till 2020s. Flexible ureteroscopic procedures were practiced since late 2010s.
After a political turmoil in 2021, some Human Resources in urology training pipeline were diverted and local resident training programs were disrupted.
Open urological procedures were routinely conducted but Endourology practices were severely affected in district area as a result of deficient Human Resources and logistical facilities.
Now, we are trying to push up the Endourology practice in secondary hospitals.
-
-
TICC - 3F South Lounge
|
|
12:00
13:00
|
Time to Shift: From Medication Reliance to Minimally Invasive BPH Solutions
-
William J. HuangTaiwan
Moderator
Male Infertility: Challenges and Opportunities in AsiaMale infertility contributes to nearly 50% of all infertility cases, with an increasing burden observed across Asia. In parallel, a dramatic decline in birth rates has emerged in several Asian countries—including South Korea, Japan, Taiwan, and Singapore—reaching historically low total fertility rates (TFRs) of under 1.0. While multifactorial in nature, this demographic crisis underscores the urgent need to address all aspects of reproductive health, including the often-overlooked role of male infertility. Epidemiological data reveal significant regional disparities in the prevalence, diagnosis, and treatment of male infertility. Cultural stigma, limited andrology training, fragmented referral systems, and inadequate coverage of assisted reproductive technologies (ART) have impeded timely diagnosis and intervention. Environmental exposures, endocrine-disrupting chemicals, occupational heat, and increased paternal age have all been linked to declining semen quality, as evidenced by longitudinal studies showing decreased sperm concentration and motility in several urban centers across Asia. Current diagnostic tools—including semen analysis, hormone profiling, genetic testing (e.g., Y-chromosome microdeletion, karyotyping), and imaging—enable better etiological categorization. Microsurgical sperm retrieval techniques such as mTESE have provided new hope for patients with non-obstructive azoospermia, while ICSI and sperm cryopreservation have become increasingly utilized where available. Nevertheless, access remains inconsistent, particularly outside metropolitan regions. Recent integration of AI-based systems for semen evaluation, patient triage, and digital counseling offers promising strategies to improve care delivery, especially in under-resourced settings. However, data privacy, regulatory standards, and user trust continue to pose barriers to widespread implementation. Opportunities for systemic improvement include the development of regional male infertility registries, integration of andrology into national reproductive health frameworks, expansion of insurance coverage for fertility services, and public awareness campaigns to destigmatize male infertility. In light of Asia’s fertility decline, repositioning male reproductive health as a public health and demographic priority is essential for sustainable population policy and long-term healthcare planning.
The Peri-Operative Care of MIST For Prostate HyperplasiaMinimally invasive surgical therapies (MIST), particularly UroLift and Rezūm, have transformed the treatment landscape for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), offering effective symptom relief with reduced morbidity and preservation of sexual function. However, optimal outcomes depend not only on procedural execution, but also on well-structured peri-operative care protocols encompassing pre-, intra-, and post-operative management. Pre-operative evaluation includes comprehensive assessment of prostate anatomy—especially size, shape, and presence of median lobe—via imaging (TRUS or cystoscopy) to determine candidacy. Careful patient selection is essential: UroLift is typically suited for prostates <80 cc without obstructive median lobes, while Rezūm accommodates broader anatomical variability but may have delayed symptom resolution. Baseline symptom scores (e.g., IPSS), uroflowmetry, and post-void residual volume establish functional benchmarks and guide patient counseling. Anesthesia planning must consider procedural setting and patient comorbidities. UroLift can often be performed under local anesthesia with light sedation, whereas Rezūm may require short general anesthesia or deeper sedation due to thermal discomfort. Appropriate selection reduces intraoperative stress and facilitates same-day discharge. Intraoperative care focuses on minimizing trauma and ensuring device precision. UroLift requires accurate deployment of implants to maintain lateral lobe retraction without compromising sphincter integrity. In Rezūm, the number and duration of vapor injections must be titrated based on lobe size and configuration to balance efficacy and tissue inflammation. Real-time visualization and standardized protocols reduce variability and improve safety. Post-operative management involves anticipating and controlling transient irritative symptoms, such as dysuria, urgency, and hematuria. Alpha-blockers and anti-inflammatory medications are commonly used for 3–7 days post-procedure. Catheterization strategies differ by technique: UroLift may avoid catheter use entirely, whereas Rezūm often requires 7-14 days of catheter drainage due to anticipated edema. Monitoring for urinary retention, UTI, or clot obstruction is critical during the early recovery phase. Follow-up care typically occurs at 2–4 weeks and includes reassessment of voiding function, symptom scores, and patient satisfaction. Reinforcement of realistic expectations is especially important with Rezūm, which may take 4–6 weeks to achieve peak efficacy. Longitudinal studies indicate sustained symptom relief and low retreatment rates when peri-operative care is standardized and patient education is emphasized. Adverse event profiles differ between techniques: UroLift is associated with less dysuria but higher retreatment rates in large prostates, while Rezūm presents higher rates of transient discomfort but favorable durability. Structured peri-operative care pathways—including patient education, standardized medication protocols, and clear complication management plans—enhance recovery, minimize adverse events, and improve overall clinical success.
Chi-Fai NgHong Kong, China
Speaker
Novel Robotic Surgery PlatformsOver the past decades, robotic surgery has become an essential approach in urological care. The recent blooming of different robotic platforms, in particular in Asian countries, has helped popularize robotic surgery in less developed countries. The introduction of robotic technology in endoluminal surgery has also helped to open up opportunities to further improve endourology. In the future, the incorporation of AI in robotic systems will help upgrade the standard of care in urology.
TICC - 2F 201AF
|
|
13:30
15:00
|
Renal Cell Carcinoma
-
-
Siros JitpraphaiThailand
Speaker
RCC and IVC ThrombectomyRCC and IVC thrombus
Siros Jitpraphai
Division of Urology, Department of Surgery,
Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, THAILAND
Abstract
Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus represents a complex surgical challenge, with an incidence of venous involvement in 4-10% of cases. This case report demonstrates the successful surgical management of a 58-year-old female patient with a large left-sided renal mass and IVC thrombus. The patient presented with gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a 10 cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma (Fuhrman nuclear grade 3) extending into the renal vein and IVC. Recognizing the complexity of the case, a multidisciplinary approach was employed, involving urological and hepatobiliary surgical teams. The comprehensive treatment strategy included an open radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. The surgical technique was meticulously planned and executed, with several key considerations. Preoperative imaging was crucial in determining the exact level of thrombus, allowing for precise surgical planning. The procedure emphasized careful vascular control and en-bloc tumor removal, with intraoperative ultrasound used to ensure accurate thrombus localization. Surgical teams worked collaboratively to minimize potential complications and maximize surgical success. Operatively, the procedure was substantial, with an estimated blood loss of 900 mL and a total operative time of 5 hours. The patient required two days of postoperative intensive care and was discharged from the hospital seven days after the surgery. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with no lymph node metastasis detected and positive tumor thrombus. Importantly, surgical margins were found to be free of tumor.
Follow-up evaluations have been encouraging, with no signs of tumor recurrence observed during regular intervals. This case illustrates the critical importance of a systematic surgical approach, precise technical execution, and comprehensive multidisciplinary management in successfully treating RCC with IVC thrombus. It provides valuable insights into the complex surgical management of this challenging condition, potentially offering guidance for similar cases in the future.
Keyword: RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma), IVC Thrombus, Thrombectomy, Surgical Technique, Multidisciplinary Management
Highlight: RCC with IVC thrombus is a complex surgical challenge affecting 4-10% of cases. Successful management requires meticulous preoperative imaging, multidisciplinary team approach, and precise surgical technique. With careful planning and execution, 45-70% of patients can be cured through radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy.
Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in Complex and Difficult Tumor Location
-
Surya Prakash VaddiIndia
Speaker
Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Immune TherapyRobotic Partial Nephrectomy in Tumors with High Renal Score
-
-
Po-Hung LinTaiwan
Speaker
Robotic Prostatectomy Using da Vinci SP SystemIn this semi-live section I will demonstrate the steps of extraperitoneal-approach radical prostatectomy using DAVINCI SP system.How to Make the Best Decision with Systemic Therapy Sequence in Respective of Genetic AnalysisRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a biologically heterogeneous disease driven by a limited set of convergent pathways that together shape oncogenesis, immune evasion, and therapeutic response. Across clear-cell RCC (ccRCC), recurrent alterations include VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2, mapping onto five dominant axes: hypoxia signaling (VHL–HIF), PI3K/AKT/mTOR, chromatin remodeling, cell-cycle control, and metabolic rewiring. These lesions variably interact—e.g., mTORC1 enhances HIF translation—creating therapeutic opportunities (VEGF tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, HIF-2α inhibition, mTOR blockade) and constraints (adaptive resistance via metabolic plasticity). While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations have improved outcomes in metastatic RCC, robust predictive biomarkers remain elusive. Tumor mutational burden is typically low and noninformative; PD-L1 shows assay- and context-dependent utility; PBRM1 and BAP1 are more prognostic than predictive. Emerging signals include angiogenic versus T-effector/myeloid transcriptional signatures, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid histology as a surrogate of immune-inflamed state, and host factors such as HLA genotype and gut microbiome composition. Liquid-biopsy modalities (ctDNA and methylome profiling) and spatial/single-cell atlases reveal intratumoral heterogeneity, T-cell exclusion niches, and myeloid programs (e.g., TREM2⁺ macrophages) linked to recurrence or ICI benefit. Early data support metabolism-targeted strategies (e.g., glutaminase inhibition) and rational combinations co-targeting angiogenesis, hypoxia signaling, and immune checkpoints; however, toxicity management and resistance evolution require prospective, biomarker-integrated trials. A clinical schema that pairs baseline multi-omic and microenvironmental profiling with adaptive surveillance (serial liquid biopsies, functional imaging) can lead to dynamically select among ICI–ICI, ICI–TKI, targeted, and experimental regimens. Robotic Prostatectomy Using da Vinci SP System
-
Seong Il SeoKorea (Republic of)
Speaker
Comparison of Remal Function between Radiofrequency Ablation versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Patial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Mass in Elderly PatientsComparison of renal function between radiofrequency ablation versus robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal mass in elderly patients
Jiwoong Yu, Seongil Seo
Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center
The incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) in patients ≥75 years has increased up to 30-fold [J Urol 2014]. In this age group, treatment should balance cancer control and renal function preservation. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are two main options.
RAPN offers excellent cancer control but requires general anesthesia and ischemia, which may pose risks in older patients. RFA is less invasive, avoids vascular clamping, and is often preferred for high-risk patients, as supported by EAU and AUA guidelines.
RFA generally preserves renal function better [Front Oncol 2022], though outcomes vary by technique. At our center, RFA under general anesthesia with wide safety margins may compromise parenchymal preservation.
While both approaches show favorable cancer control, RFA has a slightly higher recurrence rate. Pantelidou et al. reported 6 recurrences in 63 RFA cases vs. 1 in 63 RAPN cases [Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016], and Park et al. reported 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 95.2% in RFA vs. 100% in RAPN [Eur Radiol 2018]. NCCN guidelines note that RFA may require repeat treatment to match surgical outcomes.
Our institutional matched analysis (63 RAPN vs. 63 RFA) showed RFS of 100% vs. 95.2% (p = 0.029), and immediate eGFR preservation of 91.7% vs. 86.8% [Eur Radiol 2018;28:2979–2985]. A subsequent analysis of older patients presented at AUA 2024 included 137 patients aged ≥75, the rate of ≥25% eGFR decline at one year was 28.6% for RFA vs. 2.0% for RAPN (HR 11.3, p = 0.002), with 4 recurrences in RFA and none in RAPN.
In conclusion, both RFA and RAPN are viable options for elderly patients with small renal masses. RFA is less invasive but may carry a slightly higher risk of recurrence and, depending on institutional technique, some degree of renal function loss. Treatment should be individualized based on tumor anatomy, patient condition, and institutional expertise.
-
Steven L. ChangUnited States
Speaker
The Progression Landscape of Diagnostic and Treatment Options for Kidney CancerPros and Cons in the daVinci SP System Applications in Urological Surgeries
TICC - 2F 201BC
|
|
15:30
17:00
|
Prostate Cancer
-
Lui Shiong LeeSingapore
Moderator
Technical Pearls: Robotic Intra-Corporeal OBSThis session will demonstrate the key steps required in the intra-corporeal creation of a Studer type orthotropic bladder substitute.
-
Peter Ka-Fung ChiuHong Kong, China
Speaker
Minimal Invasive Therapy: Where do We Stand in 2025Endourological, Laparoscopic and robotic surgeries have replaced most open surgeries in Urology. Emergence of new robotic platforms have provided urologists with new opportunities. Both boom-type and module-type robots have been used, and they each have their strengths in practice. Tele-surgeries have provided a new paradigm of long-distance robotic surgeries to facilitate new surgical possibilities and proctorship. State of the art robotic surgeries in retrograde intrarenal surgeries and enbloc resection MDT Discussion: Personalizing Treatment in High Volume CSPCN/ADebate: Should We Only Offer Consolidative Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in Metastatic RCC?N/AFocal Therapy in Asia – Is It Prime Time?The increase in incidence of Prostate cancer has been rapid in Asia in the past 10 years. While Robotic radical prostatectomy and Radiotherapy has been the commonest treatments for localized prostate cancer, significant long-term morbidities are observed after surgery or radiotherapy including incontinence, erectile dysfunction and irradiation injury to the bladder and rectum. In the current era of MRI-guided prostate biopsy, focal diseases can be targeted and diagnosed, and image-guided focal therapy emerged as an alternative treatment. Although Focal therapy has a relatively higher rate of local recurrence, it has the advantages of minimal or no long-term complication after treatment, and it is possible to perform retreatment with focal therapy, prostatectomy or radiotherapy. In properly selected patients, the need for salvage prostatectomy or radiotherapy after focal therapy is less than 20% at 8 years, and patients’ quality of life could be preserved. In well-selected patients, focal therapy is an attractive option. Current focal therapy for prostate cancer available in Asia includes HIFU, Cryotherapy, Targeted Microwave Ablation (TMA), irreversible electroporation (IRE) and TULSA.
-
-
Stephen A. BoorjianUnited States
Speaker
AUA Lecture: 2025 Update of AUA and EAU NMIBC GuidelinesBoth the American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) have developed guidelines for the management of non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). While subtle differences in several aspects of these guidelines exist which merit mentioning, both guidelines emphasis the concept of risk stratification. In particular, understanding the criteria which classifies patients with NMIBC as high risk avoids undertreatment of the patients most likely to experience disease progress. Likewise, recognizing the indications for cystectomy among high risk NMIBC patients is critical to optimize survival. Meanwhile, continued options emerge for patients classified as having BCG unresponsive NMIBC, such that knowledge of that definition as well as current management strategies for these patients facilitates contemporary practice.From Bench to Bedside - A Comprehensive Overview of Kidney CancerEvaluation of patients with a newly identified renal mass includes dedicated cross-sectional imaging for appropriate characterization. Genetic syndromes which include renal cell carcinoma (RCC) are increasingly understood, and indeed knowledge of the intracellular pathways of these conditions has facilitate rationale drug development for kidney cancer. Managing patients with a small renal mass involves a critical assessment of competing risks inherent to the tumor, the patient (underlying comorbidity status), and the proposed treatment. Renal mass biopsy may play a role in select cases for additional information/risk stratification. The safety of active surveillance is being increasingly demonstrated as longer-term follow-up matures. Meanwhile, select patients with high risk disease now have the option of adjuvant immunotherapy following surgical resection. In the setting of metastatic RCC, again risk stratification plays a critical role in the decision for – and timing of – cytoreductive nephrectomy, particularly in the contemporary era of checkpoint inhibitor therapies.Real World Experience in the Management of Upper Tract Urothelial CarcinomaThe biggest challenging in managing upper tract urothelial carcionma (UTUC) remains accurate staging of tumors at diagnosis. Given the limited ability of contemporary staging methods, clinical risk stratification models have been developed to assist in providing risk-based treatment recommendations. For example, endoscopic management (e.g., ablation) represents the recommended first line approach for patients with low risk disease. Importantly, follow-up for these patients should include endoscopic re-evaluation. The value of testing patients with UTUC for Lynch syndrome is also critical to recognize. A role for neoadjuvant chemotherapy is being increasing explored for patients classified with high-risk UTUC, while several options exist for adjuvant chemotherapy and immunotherapy for patients with adverse pathology at surgical resection. Continued investigation into prevention of postoperative intravesical recurrences in patients with UTUC is warranted given the frequency of metachronous tumor development in the bladder among these patients.Updates on MIBC and Advanced Bladder Cancer: Where do We Stand in 2025While neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to radical cystectomy has been demonstrated with randomized trial data to improve survival for patients undergoing radical cystectomy, nevertheless utilization is often restricted by misunderstandings regarding patient eligibility factors. As such, defining eligibility criteria will facilitate increased adoption. Likewise, new data indicates a role for adjust immunotherapy in select patients following surgery as well. Moreover, important recent evidence on the role of extended lymph node dissection and the opportunities for preserving sexual function after cystectomy by modifying surgical technique are critical to review in order to optimize future patient outcomes. Further, recent advancements in systemic therapy options for patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma have led to unprecedented survival rates.Revisit on Testicular Tumors-What we Learned from past and Prepared for the FutureGerm cell tumor (GCT) progression typically occurs in a predictable sequence of disease spread to the retroperitoneum first and then distant metastases. Understanding the role of serum tumor markers at various disease stages is critical for guideline-concordant management and to optimize patient outcomes, avoiding both undertreatment and overtreatment. For patients with seminoma, retroperitoneal lymph node dissection now represents an option for patients with low volume retroperitoneal lymph node disease, with the goal of avoiding the long-term toxicities associated with chemotherapy and radiotherapy. For patients with residual postchemotherapy masses in seminoma, increasing evidence suggests that PET scans should be utilized/interpreted with caution, and that in the absence of mass growth continued follow-up may be the strategy for most patients. Similarly, for patients with nonseminomatous GCTs (NSGCT) and equivocal retroperitoneal lymph nodes at presentation, re-scanning after an interval of approximately 6-8 weeks may be preferable to initial treatment, as many of these nodes represent benign processes and as such will resolve. Nevertheless, postchemotherapy retroperitoneal lymph node dissection remains a critical component of the management of patients with NSCGT and a residual mass. Risk Stratification and Contemporary Management of Biochemical RecurrenceBiochemical recurrence (BCR) has been reported in up to 35% of patients following radical prostatectomy. Understanding the natural history and clinicopathologic risk factors associated with disease progression is critical to facilitate an individualized treatment approach. Likewise, recognizing the details of treatment delivery with salvage radiotherapy is necessary to optimize outcomes. Further, as data emerge on the utilization of systemic therapy for non-metastatic BCR, being able to contextualize reported outcomes with patient age, comorbidity status, and disease risk will enhance appropriate care delivery.
-
Ching-Chu LuTaiwan
Speaker
The Strategy to Initiate PSMA-Based Therapies for Advanced Prostate CancerPSMA-targeted radioligand therapy (PSMA RLT) has emerged as a promising treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), particularly after failure of androgen deprivation therapy, next-generation hormonal agents, and chemotherapy. While PSMA RLT is currently a third-line treatment, evidence from the PSMAfore trial suggests its potential efficacy when used earlier in the treatment sequence, prior to chemotherapy, offering a new strategy for improving progression-free survival (PFS) in mCRPC patients.
In addition, PSMA RLT is being explored in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), with ongoing trials such as PSMAddition, investigating its role in delaying disease progression and improving patient outcomes when combined with standard therapies.
Moreover, PSMA RLT is being evaluated in combination with other treatments, including PARP inhibitors, immunotherapy, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy. Numerous ongoing trials are exploring these combination therapies to further enhance the therapeutic efficacy of PSMA RLT and improve patient outcomes in advanced prostate cancer.
Novel radionuclides such as Actinium-225 (Ac-225) and Terbium-161 (Tb-161) are being investigated for their potential to improve the therapeutic profile of PSMA RLT. These isotopes offer unique advantages, including different radiation characteristics that could increase the efficacy and safety of PSMA-targeted therapies.
In conclusion, PSMA RLT is becoming a cornerstone of precision oncology for prostate cancer. As research continues to explore its use earlier in the treatment continuum, in combination with other therapies, and with the incorporation of novel radionuclides, PSMA RLT holds great promise for improving outcomes in advanced prostate cancer patients.
-
TICC - 2F 201BC
|
