Surya Prakash Vaddi

I am Dr Surya Prakash, presently working as Professor, department of Urology, Kamineni Medical college Hospital, L B Nagar, Hyderabad. I am also the Director of Surya Kidney Centre, Chaitanya puri, Hyderabad I consider myself fortunate for starting my training in urology in Sri Satya Sai institute Puttaparthi under Prof H S Bhat, who is considered as Father of Indian urology. He inspired me to work in academic institutes where there are opportunities for teaching and constant learning. I started the department of Urology at Narayana Medical College Nellore, where I worked for 10 years as a Professor and Head of the department of urology. I was instrumental in starting the MCh Urology postgraduate training program in this institute. I conducted many training programs and live operative workshops in Narayana medical college. My passion has always been teaching and research. I jointly worked with NCRM, a Japanese institute in regenerative medicine and developed a cell-based therapy for urethral stricture called BEES-HAUS therapy. I also developed a new technique for treating urinary bladder stones which I named PerBT CLT. Another innovation is Pneumorenum, a technique to facilitate easy dissection during lap nephrectomy in giant hydronephrotic kidney. All the above innovations are published in urology journals. I had started an online course on research methodology and biostatistics for urology postgraduate students while I served as the Hon. Secretary of the Association of Southern Urologists (ASU). Due to its high popularity, the course was offered again in subsequent year. I also had a key role in the launch of the ASU journal, which we called JASU (Journal of Association of Southern Urologists). I am elected as the Chairman-Elect for the Indian School of Urology, a Prestigious body under Urological Society of India. Through the Indian School of Urology I conduct training programs, mock examinations and cadaver training programs for urology postgraduates and urology consultants.

15th August 2025

Time Session
13:30
15:00
Renal Cell Carcinoma
  • Siros JitpraphaiThailand Speaker RCC and IVC ThrombectomyRCC and IVC thrombus Siros Jitpraphai Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, THAILAND Abstract Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus represents a complex surgical challenge, with an incidence of venous involvement in 4-10% of cases. This case report demonstrates the successful surgical management of a 58-year-old female patient with a large left-sided renal mass and IVC thrombus. The patient presented with gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a 10 cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma (Fuhrman nuclear grade 3) extending into the renal vein and IVC. Recognizing the complexity of the case, a multidisciplinary approach was employed, involving urological and hepatobiliary surgical teams. The comprehensive treatment strategy included an open radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. The surgical technique was meticulously planned and executed, with several key considerations. Preoperative imaging was crucial in determining the exact level of thrombus, allowing for precise surgical planning. The procedure emphasized careful vascular control and en-bloc tumor removal, with intraoperative ultrasound used to ensure accurate thrombus localization. Surgical teams worked collaboratively to minimize potential complications and maximize surgical success. Operatively, the procedure was substantial, with an estimated blood loss of 900 mL and a total operative time of 5 hours. The patient required two days of postoperative intensive care and was discharged from the hospital seven days after the surgery. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with no lymph node metastasis detected and positive tumor thrombus. Importantly, surgical margins were found to be free of tumor. Follow-up evaluations have been encouraging, with no signs of tumor recurrence observed during regular intervals. This case illustrates the critical importance of a systematic surgical approach, precise technical execution, and comprehensive multidisciplinary management in successfully treating RCC with IVC thrombus. It provides valuable insights into the complex surgical management of this challenging condition, potentially offering guidance for similar cases in the future. Keyword: RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma), IVC Thrombus, Thrombectomy, Surgical Technique, Multidisciplinary Management Highlight: RCC with IVC thrombus is a complex surgical challenge affecting 4-10% of cases. Successful management requires meticulous preoperative imaging, multidisciplinary team approach, and precise surgical technique. With careful planning and execution, 45-70% of patients can be cured through radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in Complex and Difficult Tumor Location
  • Surya Prakash VaddiIndia Speaker Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Immune TherapyRobotic Partial Nephrectomy in Tumors with High Renal Score
  • Brian Sze-ho HoHong Kong, China Speaker Robotic Partial Nephrectomy: Making Things Easier
  • Po-Hung LinTaiwan Speaker Robotic Prostatectomy Using da Vinci SP SystemIn this semi-live section I will demonstrate the steps of extraperitoneal-approach radical prostatectomy using DAVINCI SP system.How to Make the Best Decision with Systemic Therapy Sequence in Respective of Genetic AnalysisRenal cell carcinoma (RCC) is a biologically heterogeneous disease driven by a limited set of convergent pathways that together shape oncogenesis, immune evasion, and therapeutic response. Across clear-cell RCC (ccRCC), recurrent alterations include VHL, PBRM1, BAP1, and SETD2, mapping onto five dominant axes: hypoxia signaling (VHL–HIF), PI3K/AKT/mTOR, chromatin remodeling, cell-cycle control, and metabolic rewiring. These lesions variably interact—e.g., mTORC1 enhances HIF translation—creating therapeutic opportunities (VEGF tyrosine-kinase inhibitors, HIF-2α inhibition, mTOR blockade) and constraints (adaptive resistance via metabolic plasticity). While immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and ICI–TKI combinations have improved outcomes in metastatic RCC, robust predictive biomarkers remain elusive. Tumor mutational burden is typically low and noninformative; PD-L1 shows assay- and context-dependent utility; PBRM1 and BAP1 are more prognostic than predictive. Emerging signals include angiogenic versus T-effector/myeloid transcriptional signatures, sarcomatoid/rhabdoid histology as a surrogate of immune-inflamed state, and host factors such as HLA genotype and gut microbiome composition. Liquid-biopsy modalities (ctDNA and methylome profiling) and spatial/single-cell atlases reveal intratumoral heterogeneity, T-cell exclusion niches, and myeloid programs (e.g., TREM2⁺ macrophages) linked to recurrence or ICI benefit. Early data support metabolism-targeted strategies (e.g., glutaminase inhibition) and rational combinations co-targeting angiogenesis, hypoxia signaling, and immune checkpoints; however, toxicity management and resistance evolution require prospective, biomarker-integrated trials. A clinical schema that pairs baseline multi-omic and microenvironmental profiling with adaptive surveillance (serial liquid biopsies, functional imaging) can lead to dynamically select among ICI–ICI, ICI–TKI, targeted, and experimental regimens. Robotic Prostatectomy Using da Vinci SP System
  • Seong Il SeoKorea (Republic of) Speaker Comparison of Remal Function between Radiofrequency Ablation versus Robot Assisted Laparoscopic Patial Nephrectomy for Small Renal Mass in Elderly PatientsComparison of renal function between radiofrequency ablation versus robot assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for small renal mass in elderly patients Jiwoong Yu, Seongil Seo Sungkyunkwan University, Samsung Medical Center The incidence of small renal masses (SRMs) in patients ≥75 years has increased up to 30-fold [J Urol 2014]. In this age group, treatment should balance cancer control and renal function preservation. Robot-assisted partial nephrectomy (RAPN) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA) are two main options. RAPN offers excellent cancer control but requires general anesthesia and ischemia, which may pose risks in older patients. RFA is less invasive, avoids vascular clamping, and is often preferred for high-risk patients, as supported by EAU and AUA guidelines. RFA generally preserves renal function better [Front Oncol 2022], though outcomes vary by technique. At our center, RFA under general anesthesia with wide safety margins may compromise parenchymal preservation. While both approaches show favorable cancer control, RFA has a slightly higher recurrence rate. Pantelidou et al. reported 6 recurrences in 63 RFA cases vs. 1 in 63 RAPN cases [Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2016], and Park et al. reported 2-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) of 95.2% in RFA vs. 100% in RAPN [Eur Radiol 2018]. NCCN guidelines note that RFA may require repeat treatment to match surgical outcomes. Our institutional matched analysis (63 RAPN vs. 63 RFA) showed RFS of 100% vs. 95.2% (p = 0.029), and immediate eGFR preservation of 91.7% vs. 86.8% [Eur Radiol 2018;28:2979–2985]. A subsequent analysis of older patients presented at AUA 2024 included 137 patients aged ≥75, the rate of ≥25% eGFR decline at one year was 28.6% for RFA vs. 2.0% for RAPN (HR 11.3, p = 0.002), with 4 recurrences in RFA and none in RAPN. In conclusion, both RFA and RAPN are viable options for elderly patients with small renal masses. RFA is less invasive but may carry a slightly higher risk of recurrence and, depending on institutional technique, some degree of renal function loss. Treatment should be individualized based on tumor anatomy, patient condition, and institutional expertise.
  • Steven L. ChangUnited States Speaker The Progression Landscape of Diagnostic and Treatment Options for Kidney CancerPros and Cons in the daVinci SP System Applications in Urological Surgeries
TICC - 2F 201BC
15:30
17:00
  • Siros JitpraphaiThailand Speaker RCC and IVC ThrombectomyRCC and IVC thrombus Siros Jitpraphai Division of Urology, Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, THAILAND Abstract Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) with inferior vena cava (IVC) thrombus represents a complex surgical challenge, with an incidence of venous involvement in 4-10% of cases. This case report demonstrates the successful surgical management of a 58-year-old female patient with a large left-sided renal mass and IVC thrombus. The patient presented with gross hematuria and was diagnosed with a 10 cm clear cell renal cell carcinoma (Fuhrman nuclear grade 3) extending into the renal vein and IVC. Recognizing the complexity of the case, a multidisciplinary approach was employed, involving urological and hepatobiliary surgical teams. The comprehensive treatment strategy included an open radical nephrectomy with IVC thrombectomy. The surgical technique was meticulously planned and executed, with several key considerations. Preoperative imaging was crucial in determining the exact level of thrombus, allowing for precise surgical planning. The procedure emphasized careful vascular control and en-bloc tumor removal, with intraoperative ultrasound used to ensure accurate thrombus localization. Surgical teams worked collaboratively to minimize potential complications and maximize surgical success. Operatively, the procedure was substantial, with an estimated blood loss of 900 mL and a total operative time of 5 hours. The patient required two days of postoperative intensive care and was discharged from the hospital seven days after the surgery. Pathological examination confirmed the diagnosis of clear cell renal cell carcinoma, with no lymph node metastasis detected and positive tumor thrombus. Importantly, surgical margins were found to be free of tumor. Follow-up evaluations have been encouraging, with no signs of tumor recurrence observed during regular intervals. This case illustrates the critical importance of a systematic surgical approach, precise technical execution, and comprehensive multidisciplinary management in successfully treating RCC with IVC thrombus. It provides valuable insights into the complex surgical management of this challenging condition, potentially offering guidance for similar cases in the future. Keyword: RCC (Renal Cell Carcinoma), IVC Thrombus, Thrombectomy, Surgical Technique, Multidisciplinary Management Highlight: RCC with IVC thrombus is a complex surgical challenge affecting 4-10% of cases. Successful management requires meticulous preoperative imaging, multidisciplinary team approach, and precise surgical technique. With careful planning and execution, 45-70% of patients can be cured through radical nephrectomy and IVC thrombectomy. Robotic Partial Nephrectomy in Complex and Difficult Tumor Location
  • Surya Prakash VaddiIndia Speaker Cytoreductive Nephrectomy in the Era of Immune TherapyRobotic Partial Nephrectomy in Tumors with High Renal Score
  • John YuenSingapore Moderator Technical Pearls: Total Extraperitoneal TechniquePractice-Changing Development in RaLRP
    Andrew Kennedy SmithNew Zealand Speaker Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial NephrectomyNephron preservation with complete tumour excision and without complications remain the goals of surgery for early-stage kidney tumours. This surgery remains technically challenging using a minimally invasive platform, and there remain variations of technique. We present what is now an established approach within our centre, but has been enhanced by progressive improvements in the specific surgical instrumentation. The technique is achievable in a smaller centre with lower surgical volumes. We perform a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents, reliably achieving the stated goals of this surgery. Ischaemia and delayed complications are minimised by avoiding renorrhaphy and vascular clamping during dissection.Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar TumorsOur technique for hilar tumours remains similar to that for peripheral tumours, again using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents. Waterjet may be safely used directly on major vessels and collecting system structures, and directly on the tumour capsule, to perform either conventional partial nephrectomy with parenchymal margin or tumour enucleation. With hilar dissection, it is possible to visualise and control arterial supply directly to the tumour, reducing the potential for blood loss. The stated goals of this surgery are achieved. The technique which avoids renorrhaphy is particularly relevant in hilar tumours where renorrhaphy may not be technically achievable.
  • Takashi SaikaJapan Moderator
    Andrew Kennedy SmithNew Zealand Speaker Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial NephrectomyNephron preservation with complete tumour excision and without complications remain the goals of surgery for early-stage kidney tumours. This surgery remains technically challenging using a minimally invasive platform, and there remain variations of technique. We present what is now an established approach within our centre, but has been enhanced by progressive improvements in the specific surgical instrumentation. The technique is achievable in a smaller centre with lower surgical volumes. We perform a laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents, reliably achieving the stated goals of this surgery. Ischaemia and delayed complications are minimised by avoiding renorrhaphy and vascular clamping during dissection.Zero Ischemia Laparoscopic Partial Nephrectomy for Hilar TumorsOur technique for hilar tumours remains similar to that for peripheral tumours, again using waterjet and advanced bipolar energy without vascular clamping and without renorrhaphy, supplemented with topical hemostatic agents. Waterjet may be safely used directly on major vessels and collecting system structures, and directly on the tumour capsule, to perform either conventional partial nephrectomy with parenchymal margin or tumour enucleation. With hilar dissection, it is possible to visualise and control arterial supply directly to the tumour, reducing the potential for blood loss. The stated goals of this surgery are achieved. The technique which avoids renorrhaphy is particularly relevant in hilar tumours where renorrhaphy may not be technically achievable.
  • Arnulf StenzlGermany Speaker EAU Lecture: AI to Support Informed Decision Making (INSIDE) for Improved Literature Analysis in Oncology.Robot-Assisted Radical Cystectomy and Intracorporeal Neobladder Formation
TICC - 3F Plenary Hall