Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Oncological outcomes of partial cystectomy versus radical cystectomy in patients with T2N0M0 bladder cancer: A retrospective study based on the SEER database
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
China
Xuanji Li lxj2019doc@163.com Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan Department of Urology Chengdu China *
Jianzhong Ai jianzhong.ai@scu.edu.cn Institute of Urology, West China Hospital, Sichuan Department of Urology Chengdu China -
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
There is little evidence to prove which subgroup of patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) can receive partial cystectomy (PC) as an alternative to radical cystectomy (RC).
This is a retrospective cohort study. Patients with early stage MIBC (T2N0M0) who underwent RC or PC were identified from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM) was used to match cohorts receiving RC or PC. Kaplan–Meier analyses and log-rank tests were used to compare overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) between the matched cohorts. Subgroup analyses were conducted to identify patient characteristics associated with suitability for PC treatment.
After propensity score matching (PSM), log-rank tests revealed no significant differences OS (P = 0.088) or CSS (P = 0.699) between the PC and RC cohorts. Subgroup analysis after matching demonstrated that these patients with T2a-stage, low-grade tumors or receiving chemotherapy achieved comparable OS (P = 0.629; P = 0.138; P = 0.989, respectively) and CSS (P = 0.396; P = 0.173; P = 0.260) receiving PC compared to RC. Moreover, patients with non-urothelial cancers presented significantly improved OS (P = 0.023) and CSS (P = 0.014) after receiving PC compared to RC.
Given the potential clinical benefits, patients who had T2N0M0 MIBC with T2a-stage, low-grade, non-urothelial tumors or receiving neoadjuvant therapy may be suitable for PC as an alternative to RC.
radical cystectomy, partial cystectomy, muscle-invasive bladder cancer, overall survival, cancer-specific survival.
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/ae940a355d48cebb54b4ca3f0af1c7b0.png
Figure 1: The flowchart of screening for eligible patients.
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/6590315a2eb97df17ee2e055b44c0889.png
Figure 2: Oncological outcomes of PC versus RC in overall patients with T2N0M0 bladder cancer before and after 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM). (A) OS of PC versus RC before PSM; (B) CSS of PC versus RC before PSM; (C) OS of PC versus RC after PS
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/10b84e8050310c511505f764caaddf28.png
Figure 3: Oncological outcomes of PC versus RC in subgroups of patients with T2N0M0 bladder cancer after propensity score matching. OS of patients with (A) T2a stage, (C) T2b stage, (E) low-grade or (G) high-grade tumors and CSS of patients with (B)
 
 
 
 
2486
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(13): Bladder UTUC (C)
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
16:30 - 16:36
11