Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
“Missing stone” in an ectopic ureter inserting to the prostatic urethra: A case report
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Case Study
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Yi-Rong Guan billy123i38@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Jing-Heng Yan billy123i38@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital Songshan Branch Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Chih-Wei Tsao billy123i38@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Meng En billy123i38@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Tai-Lung Cha billy123i38@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Ureteral duplication is not an uncommon anomaly of the urinary tract and there have a been few cases reported of ureteral stones in completely duplicated systems. However, a stone located in an ectopic ureter inserting into the prostatic urethra is very rare.
Materials and Methods
A case of 39-year-old male who had calculus in duplication ureter with ectopic orifice. He presented with left flank colic pain. A stone in the left lower third ureter was detected by non-contrast CT. No stone was found under endoscopic vision and retrograde pyelography showed the calculus not within the course of observed ureter. However, colic pain persisted after surgery. Intravenous pyelography was arranged for ruling out duplication of ureter. The image confirmed the stone in duplication ureter which has an ectopic ureter orifice inserted below bladder neck.
Results
Second-time ureteroscopy revealed the ectopic orifice in prostatic urethral near the verumontanum by detecting active flow of urine with contrast agent. Ureteroscope was able to pass into the ectopic ureter without difficulty and the stone was successfully managed with laser lithotripsy.
Conclusions
Duplicated systems can be hard to appreciate on non-contrast CT although it has become the gold standard in diagnosis of renal calculus. This case report highlights the importance of contrast image study and skill for searching the ectopic ureter inserting to the prostatic urethra.
Keywords
ureteral duplication, ectopic ureter, ureteral calculi, case report
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/9eac69b62e8cafb17760a5dcb5186513.png
Figure 1 Caption
A stone in the left lower third ureter was detected by non-contrast CT.
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/55be7ef269bbc7154c4a7c74739a8266.png
Figure 2 Caption
Retrograde pyelography showed the calculus not within the course of observed ureter.
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/60b2749f015f081206b5d39edee3b57e.png
Figure 3 Caption
Intravenous pyelography showed duplication of ureter.
Figure 4
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/47be19225a450b72fc353554c241c369.png
Figure 4 Caption
Ectopic ureter orifice near the verumontanum.
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1117
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order