Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Balancing Survival and Quality of Life: Optimizing Treatment for Locally and Regionally Advanced Prostate Cancer
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
8
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Ho Li liho0827@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan * Gangshan Branch of Zuoying Armed Forces General Hospital Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Kaohsiung Taiwan
Co-author 2
Chih-Wei Tsao weisurger@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 3
En Meng qop811027@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Guang-Huan Sun joshuatree.amber@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Dah-Shyong Yu michael40315@yahoo.com.tw Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Sheng‐Tang Wu wushentang89@gmail.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 7
Tai-Lung Cha paosheng980279@gmai.com Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 8
Ming-Hsin Yang yangming@ndmctsgh.edu.tw Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Men diagnosed with locally advanced prostate cancer (LAPCa) or regionally advanced prostate cancer (RAPCa) face significant mortality risks. Current clinical guidelines advocate for multimodal treatment strategies, including radical prostatectomy (RP) followed by radiotherapy (RT) and RT combined with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). However, comparative data on these treatment modalities remain limited, particularly in Asian populations. Moreover, the increasing use of robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) may impact surgical precision, complication rates, and functional outcomes, potentially altering treatment-related morbidity and survival. This study aims to evaluate the survival outcomes, adverse effects, and quality of life (QoL) in patients receiving RP plus RT versus RT plus ADT in a single-institution cohort.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective cohort study included 252 patients diagnosed with cT3-T4N0M0 (LAPCa) or cT3-T4N1M0 (RAPCa) prostate cancer between 2014-2024. Propensity score matching was applied to balance baseline characteristics between the two treatment groups. Survival outcomes were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were employed to assess the impact of treatment modality on cancer-specific and overall survival. Adverse effects, including erectile dysfunction and urinary incontinence, were documented through follow-up records. QoL outcomes were evaluated using validated patient-reported measures.
Results
From 2014 to 2024, 252 men (≥60 years old) were diagnosed with LAPCa or RAPCa: 59% received RP plus RT, and 41% received RT plus ADT. Regardless of the tumor stage or the Gleason score, the adjusted 5-year prostate cancer–specific survival and 5-year overall survival favored men who underwent RP plus RT over men who underwent RT plus ADT. However, RARP plus XRT versus XRT plus ADT was associated with poorer quality of life.
Conclusions
Men with LAPCa or RAPCa treated initially with RP plus RT had a lower risk of prostate cancer–specific death and improved overall survival in comparison with those men treated. However, with RARP, pateints experienced poorer quality of life.
Keywords
Prostate Cancer, Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer (LAPCa), Regionally Advanced Prostate Cancer (RAPCa), Radical Prostatectomy (RP), Radiotherapy (RT), Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT), Robotic-Assisted Radical Prostatectomy (RARP), Quality of Life (QoL), Survival Outcomes, Propensity Score Matching, Asian Population
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1918
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order