Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Bladder Cancer Staging with Pre-Cystoscopic mpMRI: A Multicentre Evaluation of the Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System and Diffusion Kurtosis Imaging
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
9
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Gerald Mak gerald@live.com.au University of New South Wales School of Clinical Medicine Sydney Australia * St George Hospital Department of Urology Kogarah Australia
Co-author 2
Ramesh Shanmugasundaram ramesh_112@hotmail.com St George Hospital Department of Urology Kogarah Australia -
Co-author 3
Kenneth Chew kenneth.ky.chew@gmail.com St George Hospital Department of Urology Kogarah Australia - UNSW Faculty of Medicine Kensington Australia
Co-author 4
Athos Katelaris athoskat@gmail.com St George Hospital Department of Urology Kogarah Australia -
Co-author 5
Khanh Linh Dao linh.dao@student.unsw.edu.au UNSW Faculty of Medicine Kensington Australia -
Co-author 6
Claudia Hillenbrand claudia.hillenbrand@unsw.edu.au UNSW Research Imaging NSW Randwick Australia -
Co-author 7
Suresh de Silva acushla4@hotmail.com i-Med Radiology Miranda Australia - UNSW Faculty of Medicine Kensington Australia
Co-author 8
Daniel Moses daniel.moses@health.nsw.gov.au UNSW Research Imaging NSW Randwick Australia - Prince of Wales Hospital Department of Radiology Randwick Australia
Co-author 9
James Thompson drjethompson@gmail.com St George Hospital Department of Urology Kogarah Australia - UNSW Faculty of Medicine Kensington Australia
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Accurate assessment of muscle invasion is critical in determining appropriate management for bladder cancer. Under-staging remains a well-recognised limitation of transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT), even when detrusor muscle is included in the specimen. Current guidelines support consideration of a second TURBT to address this issue. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) has emerged as a promising, non-invasive tool to enhance local staging accuracy. The Vesical Imaging Reporting and Data System (VI-RADS) offers a structured approach to determine the likelihood of muscle invasion based on T2-weighted, diffusion-weighted (DWI), and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) imaging. Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI), an advanced extension of DWI, captures non-Gaussian water diffusion and may improve prediction of tumour complexity and grade. This study evaluates the diagnostic performance of VI-RADS and DKI in pre-resection staging of bladder cancer.
Materials and Methods
We evaluated the first 100 patients enrolled in a prospective, multi-centre study with suspicious bladder lesions on ultrasound or CT. All participants underwent pre-TURBT multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) using a standardised protocol incorporating T2-weighted, DWI and DCE imaging. VI-RADS scores were independently assigned by two expert radiologists. Diagnostic performance at VI-RADS cutoffs of ≥3 and ≥4 was assessed through sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV). Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) parameters were derived from DWI sequences using defined volumes of interest to calculate mean kurtosis, which was then correlated with tumour grade.
Results
Muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) was identified in 23% of patients, while 69% had non-muscle-invasive disease. The remaining 8% were diagnosed with non-bladder cancer conditions. High-grade tumours were present in 67% of cases, and 72% had pure urothelial carcinoma without variant histology. Using a VI-RADS cutoff of ≥4, the sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV for detecting MIBC were 78.3%, 85.7%, 64.3%, and 92.2%, respectively. At a cutoff of ≥3, sensitivity increased to 91.3%, specificity decreased to 54.5%, PPV was 37.5%, and NPV was 95.5%. Inter-reader agreement was strong (Cohen’s kappa = 0.81). The probability of MIBC increased progressively with higher VI-RADS scores, from 0% at a score of 1 to 90.9% at a score of 5. Diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) demonstrated a moderate correlation with tumour grade (r = 0.44, p = 0.058).
Conclusions
Pre-cystoscopic mpMRI using VI-RADS offers strong diagnostic accuracy for identifying MIBC. A low VI-RADS score can reassure clinicians when muscle invasion is not seen on TURBT. Diffusion kurtosis imaging shows promise as an adjunct tool for tumour grading and may support more accurate preoperative risk stratification.
Keywords
bladder cancer, muscle-invasive bladder cancer, multiparametric MRI, vesical imaging reporting and data system, diffusion kurtosis imaging, preoperative staging, tumour grading, transurethral resection of bladder tumour
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2832
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(13): Bladder UTUC (C)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
15:42 - 15:48
Presentation Order
3