Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Oncological and Functional outcomes of Hemi Ablation versus Focal Ablation for Localized Prostate Cancer using Irreversible Electroporation
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
China
Kai Zhang zhangkai449@126.com beijing united family hospital and clinics urology beijing China *
Michel Suberville michelsuberville@gmail.com Pôle SAINT GERMAIN - CENTRE HOSPITALIER urology paris France
Jeremy Teoh jeremyteoh@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk The Chinese University of Hong Kong urology hong kong Hong Kong, China
Jean de la Rosette j.j.delarosette@gmail.com Istanbul Medipol University urology Istanbuk Turkey
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Irreversible electroporation (IRE) is a novel technique to treat localized prostate cancer with the aim of achieving oncological control while reducing related side effects. We present the outcomes of localized prostate cancer treated with focal IRE ablation versus hemi-ablation from a retrospective study.
Men with histologically confirmed prostate cancer were recruited to receive focal IRE ablation or hemi-ablation. All the patients were proposed for transperineal template mapping prostate biopsy at 1-year post-IRE ablation. The functional outcomes were measured by the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) questionnaires.
106 patients were recruited in this study. The median follow-up time was 24 months (IQR 15-36). 94 patients underwent repeat prostate biopsy at 12-month after IRE. Persistent tumor was detected 75% in the focal ablation group and 31% in the hemi-ablation group (p<0.001). Clinically significant prostate cancer (Gleason≥3+4) was detected 27.8% in the focal ablation group and 8.6% in the hemi-ablation group (p=0.003). There was no significant difference between the two group in terms of IPSS and IIEF in each of follow-up time point.
For men with localized prostate cancer, hemi-IRE ablation treatment displayed better oncological control than focal ablation without compromising on functional or sexual outcomes.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1403
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(01): Oncology Prostate (A)
Aug. 14 (Thu.)
14:42 - 14:48
13