Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/3154c20160044b90066499f5eebcf228.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/78b2323e8560b1f8979eb3531e1f89ab.png
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
3D Laparoscopy is Better than 2D in Achieving Pentafecta in Nephron-Sparing Surgery for RCC.
Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Kidney (non-UTUC)
Author's Information
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Russia
Alexandr Seregin sasha.seregin@gmail.com Moscow Urology Center, Botkin Hospital, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education Urology Moscow Russia *
Rodion Tarasov rodiontar@mail.ru Moscow Urology Center, Botkin Hospital, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education Urology Moscow Russia -
George Aleshichev georgi18@mail.ru Moscow Urology Center, Botkin Hospital, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education Urology Moscow Russia -
Oleg Loran oleg_loran@gmail.com Moscow Urology Center, Botkin Hospital, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education Urology Moscow Russia -
Dmitry Pushkar pushkardm@mail.ru Moscow Urology Center, Botkin Hospital, Russian Medical Academy of Continuous Professional Education Urology Moscow Russia -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
The technical evolution of partial nephrectomy (PN) nowadays is aimed at performing nonischemic sutureless minimal-margin nephron sparing surgery. The aim of our study was to evaluate possible advantages in performing three-dimensional (3D) laparoscopic partial nephrectomy with respect to functional outcomes.
This study was a retrospective analysis of 180 contemporary patients undergoing PN at a tertiary academic institution between January 2019 and December 2023 with minimal follow-up of one year. Consecutive consented patients were grouped into two cohorts: group 1, where standard two-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic PN was performed (n = 100) and group 2, which had 3D PN (n = 80). Mean RENAL score was similar between groups (6.5 and 7.4, p = 0.4). All surgeries were performed by experienced laparoscopic (more then 300 PN cases) urologist. Primary outcomes assessed the benefits of application 3D technology in laparoscopic completely unclamped, minimal-margin PN; short-term changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR); and pentafecta achievement (negative surgical margins, no postoperative complications, warm ischemia time ≤25 minutes, over 90% estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) preservation and no chronic kidney disease stage progression 1 year after surgery).
Demographic data were similar among groups. The intended nonischemic sutureless minimal-margin nephron sparing technique was performed in 65% of 2D PN and 88% of 3D PN (p=0,001). The rate of pentafecta was better in 3D PN (74%) vs 2D PN (62%) (p = 0.01). In addition, 3D PN group had less blood loss (200 and 120ml; p = 0.02), whereas transfusion rates, operative time and 30-d complication rates were similar. At 1-mo postoperatively, median percentage reduction in eGFR (10.4% and 5,6%; p = 0.3) and new-onset CKD stage >3 (23% and 16%; p = 0.02) were similar. Study limitations included retrospective analysis, small sample size, and short follow-up.
The addendum of 3D vision facilitates the performing of laparoscopic nonischemic sutureless minimal-margin nephron sparing surgery and may offer renal functional advantage.
RCC, renal cancer, laparoscopy, 3D, nephron-sparing, partial nephrectomy
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1953
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Moderated Poster(05): Oncology RCC & Miscellaneous
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
15:56 -16:00
5