Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/e23c7e869428c7de1551a8b3c96d1709.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/83f9806d92020d0575e8fc18f2d26eef.png
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Comparison of distal ureterectomy and nephroureterectomy in management of high-risk urothelial carcinoma at distal ureter: a single centre experience
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Hong Kong, China
Co-author 1
Erica On Ting Chan ericaotchan@gmail.com Tuen Mun Hospital Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China *
Co-author 2
Shiu Cheong Kenny Ho kennyho1997@gmail.com Tuen Mun Hospital Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 3
Sing Hong Ernest Chui ernest.chui@gmail.com Tuen Mun Hospital Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 4
Chi Wai Man mancw@ha.org.hk Tuen Mun Hospital Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 5
Sau Kwan Chu csk268@ha.org.hk Tuen Mun Hospital Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 6
Cheung Hing Cheng chengch3@ha.org.hk Tuen Mun Hospital Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
To compare the outcome of distal ureterectomy and nephroureterectomy for high-risk urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) at distal ureter.
Materials and Methods
This is a retrospective review of patients with curative surgery, nephroureterectomy or distal ureterectomy, performed for high-risk UTUC at distal ureter in a tertiary hospital in Hong Kong. The electronic health records of the patients were reviewed to retrieve clinical data including patients’ demographics, pre-operative radiological and histological findings, details of the surgery performed, post-operative pathology results, recovery and oncological outcome. Patients with concomitant tumour at renal pelvis, upper or mid ureter, a history of radical cystectomy or non-urothelial carcinoma pathology were excluded. For statistical method, t-test and chi-square test were performed for comparison between the two groups. Kaplan-Meier and cox regression analysis were performed to review oncological outcome.
Results
From January 2010 to June 2023, a total of 44 patients with UTUC at distal ureter had surgery in Tuen Mun Hospital, with 22 distal ureterectomy. All distal ureterectomy were performed in open approach. The nephroureterectomy were performed in open or laparoscopic approach. Pluck technique or open cystostomy was used in managing bladder cuff. The patients’ mean age was 68.3±8.2 years. Most tumours were high grade or grade 3 (63.6%). Hydronephrosis was present in 80% of them. Between the two groups, there was no difference in age (p=0.464), renal function (p=0.635), classification on American Society of Anesthesiologists (p=0.186), tumour grade (p=0.988) or tumour stage (p=0.136), presence of hydronephrosis (p=0.067), suspicious or malignant urine cytology (p=0.352), carcinoma-in-situ (p=0.916), or variant histology (p=0.863). The distal ureterectomy group had more patients with previous bladder cancer (4.5% vs 31.8%, p=0.019) and smaller tumour size (19.5±9.5 vs 25.8±13.2mm, p=0.041). Intra-operatively, the distal ureterectomy group had a shorter operative duration (241.1±43.1 vs 310.5±76.5 minutes, p<0.001) and less intra-operative blood loss (545.2±430.0 vs 803.1±557.6ml, p=0.05). During the post-operative course, there was no significant difference in terms of length of stay (p=0.236), presence of complications (p=0.741) and unplanned admission in 30 days (p=0.434). However, the change in serum creatinine level at about 6 months after surgery is less in the distal ureterectomy group (3.1±14.8 vs 16.8±28.9, p=0.03). There was no significant difference in oncological outcome in terms of overall survival, cancer-specific survival, metastasis, bladder or local recurrence.
Conclusions
Distal ureterectomy is potentially a treatment for UTUC at distal ureter with an advantage of a shorter operative duration and less intra-operative blood loss, while the disease control is not compromised.
Keywords
Distal ureterectomy Nephroureterectomy UTUC
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2642
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0