Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/d596e15e39300855bb21eb5af803f5f4.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/45e5872dc96513c83ef64813e63d33c1.png
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Optimal treatment selection for Nivolumab plus Ipilimumab therapy for advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Kidney (non-UTUC)
Author's Information
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Japan
Hayato Takeda s8053@nms.ac.jp Nippon Medical School Urology Tokyo Japan *
Jun Akatsuka s00-001@nms.ac.jp Nippon Medical School Urology Tokyo Japan -
Yuki Endo y-endo1@nms.ac.jp Nippon Medical School Urology Tokyo Japan -
Yuka Toyama s4036@nms.ac.jp Nippon Medical School Urology Tokyo Japan -
Go Kimura gokimura@nms.ac.jp Nippon Medical School Urology Tokyo Japan -
Yukihiro Kondo kondoy@nms.ac.jp Nippon Medical School Urology Tokyo Japan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
In the phase Ⅲ Checkmate214 study, Nivolumab plus ipilimumab significantly improved overall survival (OS) and durable response with long time follow-up in IMDC intermediate/poor risk group advanced renal cell carcinoma (aRCC) patients, but there is limited evidence regarding the selection of patients responding to treatment. In this study, we investigated the treatment responsive patients among patients treated with nivolumab plus ipilimumab therapy.
aRCC patients who received nivolumab plus ipilimumab at Nippon Medical School were recruited. Treatment efficacy was evaluated based on RECIST ver1.1, and adverse events were evaluated using CTCAE ver5.0.
26 patients were identified. Median age was 66 years (41-85 years), 23 were male and 3 were female. 12 were unresectable, and 14 were metastatic. At the start of treatment, 16/10 cases were classified as intermediate/poor according to the IMDC classification, and 26 cases were classified as clear cell carcinoma pathologically. The median follow-up period was 45.9 months (range 3-114.6 months), and the median progression-free survival was 11.4 months (range 2.3-66.9 months). The maximum treatment effect after the start of treatment was CR/PR/SD/PD in 4/10/9/3 cases, and the response rate was 42.3% (moderate/poor=53.1%/21.0%). 8 cases had adverse events of grade 3 or higher, and four cases had irAEs requiring steroid administration. No adverse events of grade 4 or higher were observed. 6 patients are still undergoing treatment, and 4 patients have died.
Optimal treatment selection for advanced renal cell carcinoma remains controversial, but immunostaining maybe a factor. In this presentation, we will report on factors that influenced treatment, including a literature review.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1522
 
Presentation Details