Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/7c8489006a1cabe88454bb9e9a2ee5fe.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/99c56ea0fe2286cb02606a57f20bef70.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Genetic Risk and Biochemical Signatures for Urolithiasis Risk Prediction: A Cross-cohort Study in the United Kingdom and Hong Kong
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
9
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Hong Kong, China
Co-author 1
Yongle Zhan ylzhan@connect.hku.hk The University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 2
Ruochen Ma ruochenm@connect.hku.hk The University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China *
Co-author 3
Ruofan Shi shirf@hku.hk The University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 4
Xiaohao Ruan vincentruan96@gmail.com Ruijin Hospital Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine Department of Urology Shanghai China -
Co-author 5
Chi Yao yaochimed@hotmail.com The University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 6
Salida Ali u3010017@connect.hku.hk The University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 7
Tsun Tsun Stacia Chun stac@hku.hk The University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 8
Ada Tsui-Lin Ng ntl188@ha.org.hk Queen Mary Hospital Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 9
Rong Na yungna@hku.hk The University of Hong Kong Department of Surgery Hong Kong Hong Kong, China -
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
-
Co-author 12
-
Co-author 13
-
Co-author 14
-
Co-author 15
-
Co-author 16
-
Co-author 17
-
Co-author 18
-
Co-author 19
-
Co-author 20
-
Abstract Content
Introduction
Urolithiasis, a multifactorial disease with high recurrence, lacks robust tools for personalized risk prediction. While genetic susceptibility and biochemical changes are implicated in pathogenesis, their combined utility remains unexplored. This study aims to evaluate the integration of polygenic risk scores (PRS) and biomarker-derived signatures in predicting risks of incident, recurrent and multifocal urolithiasis across diverse populations.
Materials and Methods
A cross-cohort study was implemented utilizing data of 480,098 participants from the UK Biobank (UKB) and 6,177 participants from the electronic health record database of Hong Kong Hospital Authority (EHR-HK). 16 biochemical markers related to urolithiasis were identified by LASSO regression. K-means clustering analysis was performed to categorize participants into biomarker-derived clusters. PRS was computed using genome-wide significant variants.
Results
In UKB, 6,434 incident, 2,652 recurrent, and 777 multifocal urolithiasis cases were recorded respectively after a median follow-up of 13.8 years. Three biomarker signatures were identified, namely cardiovascular-skeletal (C-S), hematal-endocrine (H-E) and inflammatory-metabolic (I-M) clusters. Synergistic effects between PRS and biomarker signatures were observed: participants with top PRS quartile combined with I-M cluster had the highest risks of incident (hazard ratio [HR]=2.66, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.43-2.90), recurrent (3.56 [3.11-4.08]), and multifocal urolithiasis (2.94 [2.29-3.78]) compared to the lowest-risk group (PRS Q1 + C-S cluster) (Figure 1). Validation in EHR-HK with 1,304 incident, 263 recurrent, and 233 multifocal urolithiasis cases confirmed elevated urolithiasis odds for I-M (odds ratio [OR]=1.32, 95%CI: 1.19-1.47) and H-E clusters (1.11 [1.00-1.22]) compared to C-S cluster.
Conclusions
This cross-cohort study demonstrates that integrating PRS and biomarker-derived clusters enhances urolithiasis risk prediction, particularly for high-risk subgroups. The combination between genetic risk and biochemical signatures offers a framework for precision stratification strategies, with implications for early detection of incident, recurrent and multifocal urolithiasis in different population settings.
Keywords
Urolithiasis, Polygenic risk score, Biomarker, Cluster analysis, Interaction, Risk stratification, Cohort study.
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c9ee3566b57d5db092b876ec25e03a87.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 1. Risk stratification on urolithiasis based on genetic risks and biomarker clusters.
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1816
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Moderated Poster(02): Endourology Urolithiasis
Date
Aug. 14 (Thu.)
Time
16:12 - 16:16
Presentation Order
9