Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/193090a21f62aaa97209697d2666300e.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/7ac1e53a6d71b5eab6fd37d4c1ee4d27.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Retrospective evaluation of perioperative outcomes and functional evaluation in robotic-assisted radical prostatectomy using multiple devices
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Novel Advances: Robotic Surgery
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
9
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Japan
Co-author 1
Atsuhiko Yoshizawa yoshiza0326@gmail.com Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan *
Co-author 2
Kiyoshi Takahara takahara@fujita-hu.ac.jp Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan -
Co-author 3
Masanobu Saruta 2150320@gmail.com Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan -
Co-author 4
Takuhisa Nukaya takuhisa119@gmail.com Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan -
Co-author 5
Masashi Takenaka masashi.takenaka@fujita-hu.ac.jp Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan -
Co-author 6
Kenjji Zennami zenken@fujita-hu.ac.jp Nagoya University Hospital Urology Nagoya Japan -
Co-author 7
Manabu Ichino michino@fujita-hu.ac.jp Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan -
Co-author 8
Hitomi Sasaki sasakih@fujita0hu.ac.jp Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan -
Co-author 9
Ryoichi Shiroki rshiroki@fujita-hu.ac.jp Fujita Health University Hospital Urology Toyoake Japan -
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
In Japan, robot-assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP) has been covered by national health coverage since 2012 and become as a common modality. In recent years, the development of surgical robots has been remarkable, Da Vinci series S, Si, Xi, X, Davinci SP which enables single-port surgery, Hugo RAS which features an independent arm, and two Japanese domestic model hinotori and Saroa have all been obtained for pharmaceutical approval in Japan.
Materials and Methods
Our facility started performing RARP in August 2009 and has experienced 1,950 cases by early August 2024. The number of cases for each model was 1,767 for da Vinci (S, Si, Xi), 93 for hinotori from Sep. 2021, 61 for da Vinci SP from Apr. 2023, and 29 for Hugo RAS from Sep. 2023. Preoperative evaluation (age, PSA, Gleason score, clinical stage, D'Amico risk classification, presence or absence of preoperative hormone therapy), perioperative outcomes (operative time, console time, blood loss, presence or absence of nerve preservation and lymph node dissection), pathological stage and Gleason score, and postoperative evaluation were compared and examined. Differences and characteristics of settings and operations for each model were also examined.
Results
The median age was da Vinci: 67 (43-80), hinotori: 70 (52-79), da Vinci SP: 69 (51-79), Hugo RAS: 68 (54-77). The rate of D'Amico high risk, % (n) was 41.5 (734), 40.9 (38), 62.3 (38), 58.6 (17). Operative time, min was 172 (72-540), 204 (144-322), 178 (117-289), 215 (169-337). Console time, min was 124 (53-388), 139 (93-233), 128 (86-251), 140 (114-232). Estimated blood loss, mL was 150 (5-1000), 100 (5-400), 60 (5-500), 150 (5-450). The rate of pT3≦, % (n) was 20.0 (354), 23.7 (22), 29.5 (18), 10.3 (3). The rate of Radial Margin positive, % (n) was 20.0 (354), 23.7 (22),29.5 (18), 10.3 (3).
Conclusions
We compared four different devices of robot-assisted radical prostatectomy in our facility. Although there were differences in surgery time, all devices can be considered no significant difference in safety.
Keywords
robot-assisted radical prostatectomy, RARP, da Vinci, Hugo RAS, hinotori, prostate cancer
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1/a94b6d231ad4e30bb098ded4e26ba374.png
Figure 1 Caption
da Vinci S Si Xi
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1/a43d9872afc22fc1783f9464c2a2a73b.png
Figure 2 Caption
hinotori
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1/0d96df31a4fe1f417c563e5d5cff25ea.png
Figure 3 Caption
da Vinci SP
Figure 4
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1/b7c9bed0ff68186e3bdfd8a54311db4f.png
Figure 4 Caption
Hugo RAS
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1799
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0