Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/be95036108cd8d20d310592724008f49.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/e9efda2d6d6fcd9c7f2c3434a8fc9362.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Algorithmic Prediction of Gleason Score Upgrading in Biopsy 3+3 Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Tai-Hua Chiu tata14080222@gmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Kevin Lu kevinlu0620@mail2000.com.tw Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Hsiang-Ying Lee ashum1009@hotmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Yung-Shun Juan juanuro@gmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Ching-Chia Li ccli1010@hotmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Wen-Jeng Wu wejewu@kmu.edu.tw Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan -
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Patients with biopsy-confirmed Gleason score (GS) 3+3 prostate cancer (PCa) (Grade Group 1) are typically regarded as having low-risk, indolent disease. However, a significant subset may experience Gleason score upgrading (GSU) after radical prostatectomy (RP), which is associated with a higher risk of adverse outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate an algorithm-based model using clinical characteristics to predict GSU in patients undergoing RP for GS 3+3 prostate cancer.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective cohort analysis included patients who underwent RP for GS 3+3 PCa at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital between 2010 and 2023. Preoperative clinical data, including Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels, PSA density, prostate volume, number of positive biopsy cores, and multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) findings (PI-RADS scores), were incorporated into a multivariate predictive model. Model performance was evaluated using area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity.
Results
A total of 121 patients (median age 66 years, mean PSA 8.6 ng/mL) met inclusion criteria. Among these, 78 patients (64.5%) exhibited GSU on final pathology. Compared to those without upgrading, patients with GSU had a median age of 67.5 years (p=0.0594) and a higher, though not statistically significant, median pre-biopsy PSA of 9.53 ng/mL (p=0.2219). PSA density was notably elevated in the GSU group (median 0.3 ng/mL/cm³ vs. 0.18 ng/mL/cm³, p=0.0033), while prostate volume was lower (median 36.4 mL vs. 41 mL, p=0.0145). Perineural invasion (PNI) was more prevalent in the GSU group (10.53% vs. 2.33%, p=0.0838), and lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was significantly higher (53.25% vs. 20.93%, p=0.0004). The algorithm demonstrated strong predictive performance, with an AUC of 0.85, 80% accuracy, 82% sensitivity, and 77% specificity. Independent predictors of GSU included PSA density, mpMRI PI-RADS score, and PNI
Conclusions
The predictive algorithm, integrating PSA density, mpMRI findings, and biopsy characteristics, offers a reliable, individualized tool for identifying the likelihood of Gleason score upgrading in GS 3+3 prostate cancer patients. This model enhances preoperative risk stratification, enabling more personalized treatment strategies. Future validation studies and the addition of molecular biomarkers may further increase its clinical applicability.
Keywords
Prostate Cancer, Biopsy, Gleason Score, Upgrading
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/eab7fff786194f4a65b4cfb086a186f5.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Nomogram with Unit-based Scale Values for Feature Importance and Upgrade Probability Prediction
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1951
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Moderated Poster(03): Oncology Prostate (A)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
14:20 - 14:24
Presentation Order
11