Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Bilateral Single-Session Ureteroscopy for Bilateral Urolithiasis: A Systematic Review of Efficacy and Safety
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Meta Analysis / Systematic Review
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Zein Alhamdani Zeinfiras@hotmail.com Austin Health Urology Melbourne Australia * Redcliffe Hospital Urology Brisbane Australia
Co-author 2
Kunind Oberoi zeinfiras@Hotmail.com University of Melbourne Surgery Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 3
Dan Lenaghan zeinfiras@Hotmail.com University of Melbourne Surgery Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 4
Kapil Sethi zeinfiras@Hotmail.com Austin Health Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Bilateral single-session ureteroscopy (BSS-URS) is increasingly adopted for bilateral urolithiasis due to potential advantages in surgical efficiency and patient convenience. This systematic review aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BSS-URS, focusing on stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, operative time, and hospital stay.
Materials and Methods
A comprehensive search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases was conducted in accordance with PRISMA guidelines. Eighteen studies involving 2,904 patients met inclusion criteria. Data were extracted on patient demographics, outcomes, and complications. The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias.
Results
The mean overall SFR for BSS-URS was 85.1%, with initial and final SFRs of 79.88% and 95.54%, respectively. Average operative time was 74.46 minutes, and mean hospital stay was 33.48 hours. The overall complication rate was 29.2%, of which 86.7% were minor (Clavien-Dindo grades I–II). Major complications (≥Grade IIIa) occurred in only 3.9% of cases. Compared to staged unilateral ureteroscopy (SU-URS), BSS-URS had comparable SFRs but reduced total operative and hospital time.
Conclusions
BSS-URS appears to be a safe and effective treatment for bilateral urolithiasis with comparable stone clearance and a favorable complication profile. While most complications are minor, standardized definitions of outcomes and prospective multicentre trials are needed to validate these findings and support broader implementation.
Keywords
Bilateral renal stones, ureteroscopy, staged, complications
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1465
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order