Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Diagnostic Performance of Prostate Health Index (PHI) to Predicting clinical-significant Prostate cancer: a Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Podium Abstract
Meta Analysis / Systematic Review
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
China
Yi-Fan Xiong xyf020615@163.com Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Department and Institute of Urology Wuhan China *
Xing-Yu Zhong U201810328@hust.edu.cn Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Department and Institute of Urology Wuhan China -
Yu-Xuan Yang u202010333@hust.edu.cn Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Department and Institute of Urology Wuhan China -
Shao-Gang Wang sgwangtjm@163.com Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Department and Institute of Urology Wuhan China -
Qi-Dong Xia qidongxia_md@163.com Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology Department and Institute of Urology Wuhan China -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Early diagnosis of prostate cancer has always been a major concern. The Prostate Health Index (PHI), integrating total prostate-specific antigen (PSA), free PSA, and [-2]proPSA, is proposed to enhance specificity in detecting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa) compared to conventional PSA metrics. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of PHI for predicting csPCa.
A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Cochrane Library (Up to March 1, 2025) identified studies reporting PHI’s diagnostic performance against histopathological confirmation of csPCa (Grade Group≥2 or ISUP ≥2). Pooled sensitivity, specificity, and hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic curves were derived using bivariate random-effects models. Study quality was assessed via QUADAS-2. Subgroup analyses explored heterogeneity across patients‘ PSA range and continent.
Fifty-nine studies including 23019 patients were screened out in this study, PHI demonstrated a pooled sensitivity of 81% (95% CI: [78%-84%] ) and specificity of 62% (95% CI: [58%–67%]) for csPCa detection, with an AUC of 79% (95% CI [75%-82%]). In the subgroup analysis, Asia, Europe and North America showed different diagnostic accuracy with an AUC of 81% (95% CI: [77%–84%]),76% (95% CI: [72%–80%]) and 74% (95% CI: [70%-78%]).
Compared with previous studies, PHI exhibits superior specificity to traditional PSA parameters in identifying csPCa, potentially reducing unnecessary biopsies in patients with elevated PSA. However, threshold standardization and validation in diverse clinical settings are needed to optimize its integration into diagnostic pathways.
Prostate Health Index, clinical-significant Prostate cancer, diagnosis, Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/a091f0f3afe34b2811a58c5012d0e411.png
 
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/384201ea569fd1663e3a2fd1acc1e556.png
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
1357
 
Presentation Details