Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/e81956b7cfcaf111642ca34d83beb3bb.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/6f014be0f189621ea8fb727aded305d0.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Risk Factors and the Role of Antibiotic Prophylaxis in Post-Urodynamic UTIs : A Retrospective Study in 254 Asian Patients
Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Infectious Disease / Urologic Trauma
Author's Information
3
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Taiwan
Yu-Hsuan Chen b101107093@tmu.edu.tw National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Tainan Taiwan *
Chien-Hsiung Lo david811912@gmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Yin-Chien Ou ooddkk@hotmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Multichannel urodynamic study (UDS) is essential for diagnosing lower urinary tract dysfunction, especially in patients with neurological disease or refractory symptoms. However, its invasive nature poses a risk for post-procedural urinary tract infections (UTIs). The Best Practice Policy Statement (BPPS) discourages routine antibiotic prophylaxis in low-risk "index" patients, though evidence supports potential benefit in high-risk individuals. The clinical value of prophylactic antibiotics in non-index, high-risk populations remains unclear. This study aims to evaluate whether prophylactic antibiotics reduce post-UDS UTIs, especially in patients with known high-risk features.
This retrospective cohort study included patients who underwent multichannel UDS at our institution between January and September 2024. Baseline characteristics, history of neurogenic lower urinary tract dysfunction, catheter use, immunosuppression status, prior recurrent UTI, and urodynamic parameters were collected. All UDS procedures followed International Continence Society (ICS) standards. Antibiotic prophylaxis was clinician-dependent but typically withheld in index patients. Post-UDS symptomatic UTI was defined as a new-onset, symptomatic, culture-proven UTI within 30 days. Febrile UTI was defined by concurrent fever >38°C. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests and logistic regression to identify risk factors. Subgroup analyses evaluated prophylaxis effects in high-risk subpopulations.
Among the 254 patients analyzed (166 males, 88 females; mean age 64.1 ± 16.5 years), 113 (44.4%) received prophylactic antibiotics. Overall, 32 patients (12.6%) developed symptomatic UTIs following urodynamic study (UDS), including 12 (4.7%) febrile UTIs. Prophylactic antibiotic use was not significantly associated with a reduced incidence of symptomatic (p = 0.166) or febrile UTIs (p = 0.771). Multivariate analysis identified elevated post-void residual (PVR >100 mL) (OR = 5.73, p < 0.001) and catheter use (OR = 4.96, p < 0.001) as independent risk factors for post-UDS symptomatic UTIs. Subgroup analyses showed no protective antibiotic effect in patients with elevated PVR (p=0.660) or catheter use (p=0.253).
Elevated PVR and catheter use are significant risk factors for post-UDS infections. Prophylactic antibiotics did not demonstrate protective efficacy, even among high-risk patients.
Infection, Urinary Tract; Prevention; Retrospective Study; Urodynamics Techniques
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/7a6bd4e09b0f96543512d6c2db67d071.jpg
Table 1: Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses for predicting post-UDS symptomatic UTI
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2215
 
Presentation Details
 
 
 
0