Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Withdrawn
Abstract
Abstract Title
Lymph Node Density as a Prognostic Marker in Penile Squamous Carcinoma
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Case Study
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Urethra/ Penis/ Testes/ Sarcoma/ Miscellaneous
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
9
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
India
Co-author 1
Santosh Menon mensantosh@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Mumbai India *
Co-author 2
Ashish Shah ashish.6.shah@gmail.com Tata Memorial centre Pathology Mumbai India -
Co-author 3
Akash Sali aakki1910@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Pathology Mumbai India -
Co-author 4
Amandeep Arora amandeeparora12389@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Urology India -
Co-author 5
Priyamvada Maitre priyamvadamaitre@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Radiation Oncology India -
Co-author 6
Gagan Prakash gagan2311@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Urology India -
Co-author 7
Mahendra Pal mahen1197@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Urology Mumbai India -
Co-author 8
Amit Joshi dramitjoshi74@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Medical Oncology Mumbai India -
Co-author 9
Vedang Murthy vedangmurthy@gmail.com Tata Memorial Centre Radiation Oncology Mumbai India -
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Inguinal lymph nodal metastasis is the most important prognostic factor in Penile squamous cell carcinoma (PSCC). Lymph node density (LND), is defined as the total number of positive lymph nodes (LNs) divided by the total number of LNs removed, expressed as a percentage. LND in penile cancer has been studied previously in other studies with a cut-off of 6.7% to 16% being suggested as a clinically significant prognostic parameter, which correlates with disease outcomes.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective analysis of 105 cases diagnosed as PSCC who had undergone primary surgical treatment with/without either upfront or follow-up unilateral/bilateral inguinal node dissection was performed. Disease-free survival (DFS) was calculated by Kaplan Meier analysis. A cutoff for LND was defined by plotting a receiver operating characteristic curve and using the highest Youden's index as a discriminator.
Results
After excluding cases where nodal dissection was negative, we had a total of 40 cases for analysis of LND. The median of positive LNs was 2 (1-15) and total LNs dissected was 19 (12-45). Median DFS was 9 months in those with positive LNs (n=40). Median LND was 10.43% (3.45-75%). A cut-off of 28.8% with a Youden's index of 0.4 on the other hand was found clinically significant cut- off for LND for this cohort
Conclusions
LND is an under-recognized parameter with few studies validating its prognostic impact in PSCC. Our study did not show a statistical difference between the two groups using a cutoff of 6.7%. Although the cutoff of 28.8% did show a difference in DFS for the two groups, there was an unequal distribution of cases in both groups. Nonetheless, a higher cut-off should be explored in future studies, particularly in our region where patients frequently present with advanced stages and matted LNs. Reference:1. Svatek RS, Munsell M, Pettaway CA et al. J Urol. 2009;182(6):2721-7.
Keywords
Density; lymph node; penile cancer
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/231ff9e83f4a4ce9edbccc64cc940f2b.png
Figure 1 Caption
Selection of cohort
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/402957cd23f6dae8402352bacad9659a.png
Figure 2 Caption
DFS comparison with LND of 6.7% vs 28.8%
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1296
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order