Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
A bad case of penile garrotting
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Case Study
Abstract Category *
Functional Urology: Reconstructive Surgery
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Thomas Milton Thomas.Milton@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Department of Surgery Adelaide Australia *
Co-author 2
Thomas Milton Thomas.Milton@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Department of Surgery Adelaide Australia -
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Penile garrotting is a rare presentation for Urology that can have severe consequences for the patient. The constricting agent used can be variable and the indication is usually for erectile dysfunction or incontinence. It can be managed conservatively, with delayed primary repair or two stage procedures. We present a 69-year-old man who presented with extensive erosion of the penis requiring reconstructive surgery. A plastic bottle cap was fashioned into a penile constriction device and used to treat erectile dysfunction. The ring had been on his penis for 4 weeks when he presented to the emergency department (Image 1). The ring was urgently removed with a ring cutter. On examination, there was erosion through corpora cavernosa and corpora spongiosum with urethra on display, which is a Grade 2 Bashir and El-Barbary injury. A 16Fr IDC was inserted under direct vision of urethra externally and managed conservatively with intravenous antibiotics with the plan for a delayed reconstructive surgery. Two weeks later, he was taken to the operating theatre for reconstruction. His penis was degloved to assess the corpora cavernosa and urethra. His urethral defect was closed with 3-0 vicryl interrupted sutures with an IDC in situ and then the urethra was examined internally with a flexible cystoscopy to ensure closure. Both corpora cavernosa were also repaired with 3-0 vicryl interrupted sutures, followed by closure of Bucks’s fascia and skin. He was left with a 16Fr IDC for three weeks and given 10 days of oral amoxicillin and clavulanic acid. He was followed up periodically to assess wound healing. At his three-month post-operative appointment, his penile wound had completely healed. He was able to successfully void for a short period, however unfortunately due to other health issues he was required to have the catheter reinserted long-term.
Materials and Methods
Case report complete with patient consent. Literature review performed.
Results
N/A
Conclusions
N/A
Keywords
Penile constriction device, penile reconstruction
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/80a3cbf808e6a8e451ca662401db1c7d.jpeg
Figure 1 Caption
Penile garrotting at presentation with constriction device
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/ef865d0d992d3755b35a5ef82b439d83.jpeg
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2946
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order