Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Evaluation of AI and Radiologist contouring on prostate MRI for targeted MRI/US fusion biopsy
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Basic Research
Abstract Category *
AI in Urology
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
1
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Thailand
Co-author 1
danai manorom danaimanorom@gmail.com national cancer institute urology bangkok Thailand *
Co-author 2
-
Co-author 3
-
Co-author 4
-
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
This study aims to evaluate the performance of artificial intelligence (AI) in delineating the prostate gland from MRI images by comparing it with contours drawn by diagnostic radiologists, in order to support the accuracy of MRI fusion biopsy for prostate cancer.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective study developed and evaluated an AI-based prostate segmentation model using 125 annotated prostate MRI cases (3,193 images) from a public dataset for training, and tested it on 109 clinical cases (2,952 images) from the National Cancer Institute of Thailand. The model combined a YOLO-based bounding box detection with the Segment Anything Model (SAM) for prostate segmentation. Model performance was compared to radiologist-drawn contours using Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC) and % Relative Percent Difference (RPD) in prostate volume estimation
Results
For cases not requiring post-processing, the AI model achieved a mean DSC of 0.72 and an RPD of 8.90% compared to radiologist contours. For cases requiring post-processing, the DSC dropped to 0.66 and the RPD increased to 13.45%. These results indicate a high level of agreement between the AI and expert annotations, particularly in standard cases.
Conclusions
The AI-based model demonstrated promising accuracy in segmenting the prostate gland on MRI scans, comparable to radiologist performance. This approach has the potential to reduce diagnostic delays and lessen radiologist workload in prostate cancer workflows. Future improvements should focus on enhancing model precision, incorporating PIRADS scoring, and validating the system across diverse clinical settings to support safe and effective integration into routine diagnostic practice.
Keywords
AI contouring prostate gland, MRI Fusion biopsy of Prostate, MRI Prostate
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/2894e55f60f130243a8dc2ce96495d94.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/4749fb47ca95bed4fd6fe38af4a916f7.jpg
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/07b0b48965799b0eb97e2eeacac6b560.jpg
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2667
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(06): Training and Education & AI in Urology
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
13:42 - 13:48
Presentation Order
3