Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/11f1de1f26dafb889452d3f4fd6a5edf.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/d9f0d2ef9c7730551422b8b56868f358.png
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Comparative Analysis of Prostate Volume Measurement Methods for PSA Density: Deep Learning-Based Autosegmentation in MR/TRUS Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
8
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Chen-Hao Hsu henryhsu3388@gmail.com Taipei Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Chih-Ching Lai jonas010412@gmail.com National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Yu-Ching Peng ycpeng6@vghtpe.gov.tw National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine Taipei Taiwan - Taipei Veterans General Hospital Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 4
William J. Huang williamjshuang@gmail.com Taipei Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan - School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Shu-Tien Urological Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 5
Eric Yi-Hsiu Huang yhhuang1@gmail.com Taipei Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan - School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Shu-Tien Urological Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 6
Yu-Hua Fan yhfan2@gmail.com Taipei Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan - School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Shu-Tien Urological Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 7
Shu-Huei Shen shshen2003@gmail.com National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University School of Medicine Taipei Taiwan - Taipei Veterans General Hospital Department of Radiology Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 8
Tzu-Ping Lin tplin63@hotmail.com Taipei Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan - School of Medicine, College of Medicine and Shu-Tien Urological Research Center, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Prostate-specific antigen density (PSAd) is a valuable predictor of prostate cancer in patients undergoing transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) guided prostate biopsy. This study aims to assess the predictive efficacy of PSAd when prostate volume is measured using different methods. We apply deep learning-based autosegmentation to calculate prostate volume and compare its performance to traditional methods with ultrasound and MRI-based ellipsoid volume estimates.
Materials and Methods
A total of 256 patients who underwent MR/TRUS fusion targeted prostate biopsies between 2020 and 2024 were retrospectively analyzed. 6 patients with a history of transurethral resection of the prostate or those treated with 5α-reductase inhibitors or testosterone were excluded. All patients had preoperative MRI revealing PI-RADS 3, 4, or 5 lesions. Prostate volume was measured using three methods: (1) ultrasound-derived ellipsoid formula, (2) MRI-derived ellipsoid formula, (3) deep learning-based autosegmentation. PSAd was calculated as the ratio of preoperative PSA to the prostate volume determined by each method. The predictive accuracy of each method for biopsy-proven prostate cancer was compared by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and area under the curve (AUC).
Results
The 250 patients were stratified into PI-RADS 3 (n=60), PI-RADS 4 (n=73), and PI-RADS 5 (n=117), with positive biopsy rates of 41.7%, 74.0%, and 92.3%. PSA were 8.26 ± 3.83, 7.54 ± 3.77, and 16.28 ± 23.48 ng/mL across the groups. ROC analysis showed AUCs for PI-RADS 3 lesions of 0.59 (ultrasound), 0.60 (MRI), and 0.62 (autosegmentation). For PI-RADS 4 lesions, AUCs were 0.73, 0.74, and 0.75, and for PI-RADS 5 lesions, they were 0.71, 0.73, and 0.74. Autosegmentation consistently yielded higher AUCs across the groups, indicating improved predictive accuracy for biopsy outcomes compared to traditional methods. For PI-RADS 3 lesions, the optimal threshold for PSAd (autosegmentation) is 0.12 ng/mL², with sensitivity of 84.0% and specificity of 45.9%. For PI-RADS 4 lesions, the threshold is 0.15 ng/mL², achieving sensitivity of 65.5% and specificity of 73.9%. For PI-RADS 5 lesions, the threshold is 0.23 ng/mL², yielding sensitivity of 58.7% and specificity of 80.0%.
Conclusions
Deep learning-based autosegmentation offers a more accurate method for calculating prostate volume, leading to more precise PSAd assessment. This study shows potential for improving detection in MR/TRUS fusion-targeted biopsies, especially for PI-RADS 4 and 5 lesions.
Keywords
Prostate-specific antigen density; deep learning-based autosegmentation; MR/TRUS fusion targeted prostate biopsy; prostate volume
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c8a9655f8609bd015e8f5e1287e215b3.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Comparison of ROC curves and AUCs for PSAd measurement methods using ultrasound (sono), MRI, and autosegmentation (AI) in predicting biopsy results for PI-RADS 3, 4, and 5 lesions
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2226
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order