Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) for localised prostate cancer: initial experiences at an academic centre
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Jonathon Carll jonathon.carll@my.jcu.edu.au Epworth Freemasons EJ Whitten Centre for Prostate Cancer Research Melbourne Australia * Royal Melbourne Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia University of Melbourne Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences Melbourne Australia
Co-author 2
Nathan Lawrentshuk lawrentshuk@gmail.com Epworth Freemasons EJ Whitten Centre for Prostate Cancer Research Melbourne Australia - Royal Melbourne Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia University of Melbourne Medicine, Dentistry and Health Sciences Melbourne Australia
Co-author 3
Co-author 4
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Irreversible Electroporation (IRE) also known as Nanoknife, is an emerging focal therapy used in the treatment of localised prostate cancer. It remains an investigational, technique with long-term oncological outcomes not yet well-established. This study assesses the initial experience from a prospectively collected database at a single institution.
Materials and Methods
From June of 2018, all men undergoing IRE at a single institution and were registered in a prospective database. Information such as pre-operative PSA, MRI, PSMA PET and biopsy findings was collected. Post-operative data including complications, PSA decrease, need for further therapy, and post-treatment biopsy was collected.
Results
From June of 2018, 103 men underwent IRE at a single institution and were registered in a database. Mean pre-operative PSA was 6.44. 62% of men underwent IRE as a primary treatment, whilst 2% had redo, and 35% had IRE as a salvage treatment. 4.7% of men had ISUP 1 disease, whilst men ISUP 2 accounted for 60% of cases, ISUP 3 24.7%, ISUP 4 3.5% and ISUP 5.7% of cases. Our data explores rates of requiring salvage therapy, complications and long-term PSA trends.
Conclusions
IRE Remains a feasible treatment option for men with localised prostate cancer. However, it’s utility is limited by high rates of further treatment and unproven long-term oncological efficacy. Yet it remains a safe and valid option, particularly with men seeking to defer definitive treatment for some time. Our data provides useful insight into developing a localised IRE service, along with associated pearls and pitfalls.
Keywords
Irreversible Electroporation, Nanoknife, PSA, Salvage therapy
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1565
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(12): Oncology Prostate (C)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
16:00 - 16:06
Presentation Order
6