Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Usefulness of virtual reality application in pediatric urology
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Novel Advances: New Technology
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
India
Co-author 1
Vijayanand M mvijayanandmdr@gmail.com Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER) Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation Chennai India *
Co-author 2
Abirami Anbarasu M41230007@sriher.edu.in Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER) Department of General Surgery Chennai India -
Co-author 3
Heera Tharanenthran heeratharanendran@gmail.com Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER) Department of Paediatric Urology Chennai India -
Co-author 4
Ramesh Babu Srinivasan drrameshbabu1@gmail.com Sri Ramachandra Institute of Higher Education and Research (SRIHER) Department of Paediatric Urology Chennai India -
Co-author 5
-
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Virtual reality (VR) reconstruction allows immersive experience and enables visualization of vascular/ complex anatomy. In this prospective study we analyzed usefulness of VR in pediatric urology.
Materials and Methods
All patients who underwent VR reconstruction in our department over the last one year (2023-24) were included. Contrast enhanced CT scan/ MRI images were obtained at 1mm thickness. A VR model and a 3D environment were created (Immersive view5.0; Immersive Touch Inc. 910). The usefulness was assessed by three independent physicians on a Likert scale (1-5) on the following headings: anatomical delineation, haptic tools, pre-surgical planning, student teaching and patient counseling. Inter class correlation (ICC) analysis was performed using SPSS.
Results
Among 275 patients managed, 20 cases underwent VR reconstruction in view of the complex anatomy/ combination of anomalies. The diagnoses were bilateral Wilms Tumor 1; pelvic kidney UPJO 1; horse shoe kidney 1; malrotated UPJO 1, duplication anomalies 8, recto urethral fistula 1; exstrophy variants 3, complex urolithiasis 2, bladder diverticulum 1 and renal trauma with urinoma 1. Among the study population 18/20 underwent surgical treatment; two were managed conservatively (renal trauma-1; pseudo exstrophy -1). The mean usefulness score was: anatomical delineation 3.9, haptic tools 3.1, surgical planning 3.6, student training 4.1 and patient counseling 4.2. ICC for indivudal measures was 0.893 (95% CI 0.792-0.952; p<0.001)
Conclusions
VR application is most useful for patient counseling/ student education followed by anatomical delineation and presurgical planning. Selection of ideal cases for VR will make this novel tool cost-effective.
Keywords
Virtual Reality (VR), Pediatric Urology, 3D Reconstruction, Complex Urological Anomalies, Patient-Specific Modeling
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1478
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(11): Pediatric Urology
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
15:30 - 15:36
Presentation Order
1