Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Validation of the BURST collaborative score for likelihood of spontaneous ureteral calculus passage in an Australian cohort
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
9
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Darcy Noll darcy.noll@gmail.com Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia * University of Adelaide Dept of Surgery Adelaide Australia
Co-author 2
Thomas Milton thomas.milton@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia - University of Adelaide Dept of Surgery Adelaide
Co-author 3
Peter Stapleton peter.stapleton95@gmail.com Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia -
Co-author 4
Luke Stroman luke.stroman@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia -
Co-author 5
Sytse Van Beek sytse.vanbeek@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia -
Co-author 6
Peter Zhang peter.zhang@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia -
Co-author 7
Justin Chow jonathan.chow@sa.gov.au Australia -
Co-author 8
Jonathan Chieng jonathan.chieng@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia -
Co-author 9
Richard Steele richard.steele@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Urology Adelaide Australia -
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
The MIMIC score was designed to determine the likelihood of spontaneous ureteral stone passage (SSP) in patients presenting with renal colic and managed conservatively. The MIMIC score is widely used in clinical practice to counsel patients regarding their likelihood of successful SSP, however its use in cohorts outside of the United Kingdom has not been validated. The aim of this study was to determine the external validity of the MIMIC score.
Materials and Methods
This was retrospective cross sectional cohort study that reviewed patients who presented to the emergency department (ED) of a tertiary referral centre with renal colic and imaging proven ureteral calculus between 2021 and 2022. All factors required for calculation of the MIMIC score were recorded, in addition to patient demographic details. The outcome of SSP was determined by review all private and public imaging providers within our state, as well as review of any ED or inpatient admissions to hospitals in our state. The calculated score was compared to the observed outcome. Discrimination was determined using an area under the receiver-operating curve with an AUC >0.7 considered validated and calibration using calibration plot.
Results
397 patients were included. The median age was 49 (IQR 37–60). 79% were males. The mean stone size for successful and non-successful SSP was 3.8 mm and 4.8 mm respectively. 88% of stones passed spontaneously. The AUC was 0.68 (95% CI: 0.60–0.77). The calibration plot showed an underestimation of SSP. In the lowest quintile of patients with a mean predicted SSP rate of 46%, the observed SSP rate was 74% (95% CI: 63–83%). With a higher predicted SSP rate, the MIMIC score was accurate. In the highest quintile of patients with a mean predicted SSP rate of 90%, the observed SSP rate was 92% (95% CI: 84–97%).
Conclusions
In this population, the prediction of the MIMIC score were not sufficiently accurate. There was a tendency to underestimate the likelihood of SSP in our cohort, particularly in patients whose MIMIC score estimated a low likelihood of passage. The MIMIC score was accurate for patients who had a higher likelihood of SSP (>83%). Clinicians outside the UK should use the MIMIC score with caution, further scoring systems are required outside of this population.
Keywords
Urolithiasis, risk calculators, patient education, spontaneous passage
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1800
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(02): Endourology (A)
Date
Aug. 14 (Thu.)
Time
15:54 - 16:00
Presentation Order
5