Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Rejected
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Case Report - A Forgotten Ureteric Stent: Three Years Left In Situ
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Case Study
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
2
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Cheryl Fung cherylxuan97@gmail.com Dubbo Hospital Urology Dubbo Australia *
Co-author 2
Balasubramanian Indrajit bala.indrajit@health.nsw.gov.au Dubbo Hospital Urology Dubbo Australia -
Co-author 3
Co-author 4
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Double J stents have coiled ends to prevent migration, making them self-retaining. They are used short-term to relieve urinary tract obstruction, such as from a ureteric stone. Long-term use requires regular changes every 4–6 months. Prolonged retention can cause encrustation, stone formation, stent fracture, blockage (leading to hydronephrosis and renal impairment), and infections (recurrent UTIs or sepsis). Forgotten, encrusted stents—often due to poor patient compliance or inadequate counseling—pose a challenge, with no consensus on optimal treatment (endourological or open surgery may be required).
Materials and Methods
A case study of a 37-year-old woman with urosepsis and acute kidney injury due to a forgotten ureteric stent left in situ for three years. She initially has a ureteric stent inserted for an infected ureteric stone, she missed follow-up due to personal and logistic issues. Over two years, she had recurrent flank pain, but despite CT evidence of large bladder and intrarenal stones, no urology follow-up was arranged. This admission, she had E. coli septic shock. After IV antibiotics, laser lithotripsy was performed for the encrusted stent and stones (bladder, renal pelvis, PUJ). Post-op, she had a septic shower but improved with treatment. Unfortunately, she self-discharged on day six and failed to attend follow-up.
Results
Conclusions
Rural patients often struggle with follow-up due to limited access to care, logistical challenges, and socioeconomic barriers. Enhancing patient education on stent complications and ensuring thorough pre- and post-insertion counselling are essential to reduce lost-to-follow-up rates—a key responsibility of treating physicians. This case illustrates the importance of developing robust follow-up mechanisms and patient education to ensure timely removal or replacement of ureteric stents, particularly in rural healthcare settings. Addressing these gaps can prevent long-term complications and improve outcomes.
Keywords
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/41c6841a4a387e2ad4a22cdf79285587.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Encrusted stent along the left ureter
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c10171439a37bf3f50448da4156bcd27.jpg
Figure 2 Caption
Bladder stone from encrustation of distal coil
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/08012cad0741a23056488889a63d7284.jpg
Figure 3 Caption
Encrustation of proximal coil
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1331
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order