Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Preoperative Machine Learning Algorithm for Predicting Urosepsis After Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Using EMR Data
Presentation Type
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
AI in Urology
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
China
Co-author 1
Zuheng Wang 202310044@sr.gxmu.edu.cn Guangxi Medical University Department of Urology Nanning China *
Co-author 2
Xiao Li 17861171617@163.com Guangxi Medical University Department of Urology Nanning China
Co-author 3
Wenhao Lu lwh950316@126.com Guangxi Medical University Department of Urology Nanning China
Co-author 4
Fubo Wang wangfubo@gxmu.edu.cn Guangxi Medical University Department of Urology Nanning China
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Urosepsis is the most hazardous complication of percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PNL). Early warning and timely intervention are essential to reduce the mortality associated with urosepsis. We aimed to develop and validate a preoperative machine learning (ML) algorithm to predict the urosepsis after PNL based on electronic medical record (EMR) data.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively screened 360 patients with urosepsis and 2636 patients without urosepsis. Multimodal clinical parameters were collected, including demographics, admission vital signs, imaging reports, and laboratory tests. Participants were randomly allocated into the training cohort (80%) and the validation cohort (20%). Five ML algorithms were applied to construct the models, including support vector machines (SVCs), random forest (RF), Logistic Regression (LR), XGBoost and Stacking. The predictive abilities of algorithms were assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.
Results
Out of 83 clinical parameters, 44 variables were statistically significant. In the training cohort, the Random Forest (RF) model exhibited the highest accuracy, with an Area Under the ROC curve (AUC) of 0.987. In the validation cohort, all models achieved an AUC of over 0.7. Among them, the Stacking model showed the best predictive performance with an AUC of 0.754. Neutrophils and white blood cell count were the most important factors included in the 31 parameters of the Stacking model.
Conclusions
We established a ML model with 31 parameters from EMR data, which can help to distinguish patients with high risks of urosepsis before the operation. This will allow clinicians to make appropriate interventions to reduce the mortality from PNL.
Keywords
Urosepsis, Percutaneous nephrolithotomy, Upper urinary calculi, Machine learning, Electronic medical records.
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/82d3f0cc45917a49548341cb19b01dfa.png
Figure 1 Caption
Flowchart of machine learning process
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/75da410e568b26099664a535f26f26a9.png
Figure 2 Caption
The order of importance of variables. Neut: neutrophils; WBC: white blood cells; Neut%: neutrophil percentage; U_LEU: urine leukocytes; ALB: albumin; GLB: globulin; Scr: serum creatinine; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; Beta2_MG: β2 microglobulin; SII:
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/b87b0b2bb93518c331f35b625112ef71.png
Figure 3 Caption
Receiver operator curve (ROC) for training cohort (A) and test cohort (B). LR, Logistic Regression; RF, random forest; SVC, support vector machines.
Figure 4
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/a40e2c325906e94545bdc32f54219475.png
Figure 4 Caption
Contributions of variables by SHAP method. Neut: neutrophils; WBC: white blood cells; Neut%: neutrophil percentage; U_LEU: urine leukocytes; ALB: albumin; GLB: globulin; Scr: serum creatinine; MCV: mean corpuscular volume; Beta2_MG: β2 microglobulin;
Figure 5
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/d7cb2a7cea836a4bdd9139eb91cbdf1d.png
Figure 5 Caption
DCA curve (A) and waterfall plot (B).
Character Count
1680
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order