Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
The Effect of Prostate MRI on NCCN prostate cancer risk stratification
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Australia
Peter Stapleton Peter.Stapleton@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Department of Surgery Adelaide Australia -
Thomas Milton Thomas.Milton@sa.gov.au Royal Adelaide Hospital Department of Surgery Adelaide Australia *
Niranjan Sathianathen niranjan19@gmail.com Grampians Health Ballarat Department of Surgery Ballarat Australia -
Michael O'Callaghan Michael.OCallaghan2@sa.gov.au Flinders Medical Centre Department of Surgery Adelaide Australia -
-
-
-
-
-
-
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
A multiparametric MRI of the prostate prior to prostate biopsy allows a targeted biopsy and more accurate pathology results. A more accurate representation of the true pathology allows better prostate cancer risk stratification and guidance of further management. The objective of this study was to determine if patients who had an MRI prostate prior to biopsy had a more accurate NCCN prostate cancer risk stratification.
We conducted a retrospective audit of 2994 men with non-metastatic prostate cancer diagnosed between 2010 and 2019 who progressed to a radical prostatectomy within 1 year of diagnosis without alternative cancer treatment from the multi-institutional South Australia Prostate Cancer Clinical Outcomes Collaborative registry. The study compared the NCCN risk stratification prior and after having a radical prostatectomy and compared the varying rates of upgrading and downgrading for patients with and without a pre-biopsy MRI. Data were also obtained on suspected confounding variables; age, PSA, time to RP, T-stage at diagnosis and RP, number of cores, number of positive cores, prostate size, tumour volume and procedure type. The results were assessed through cross tabulation and uni- and multi-variable logistic regression while adjusting for confounders.
NCCN risk stratification was calculated for all patients with available data (n = 1867). Risk stratification upgrading occurred in 57.3% (1070/1867) of patients, downgrading 6.3% (118/1867) and congruent risk stratification in 36.4% (679/1867). For patients who had an MRI prior to biopsy, the NCCN risk stratification score was upgraded 62.5% of the time compared to 67.2% for those without. The inclusion of a pre-biopsy MRI demonstrated a statically significant decrease in NCCN risk stratification in univariable analysis (p = 0.049, OR 0.82, CI 0.64–1.01). However, when adjusted for confounders, the use of an MRI did not maintain a statistical significance.
This study found that a prostate MRI prior to prostate biopsy did not have a significant impact on the change of the NCCN risk stratification of prostate cancer at the time of radical prostatectomy in multivariable analysis. This is an area with continual developments, such as the use of MRI fusing at time of biopsy which can aid to provide more accurate pathology for NCCN risk stratification.
Prostate cancer, MRI, NCCN risk stratification
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2347
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(12): Oncology Prostate (C)
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
15:48 - 15:54
4