Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/b36e6845ba9b7e34f9f52e29f0724458.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/6b1426fda1faf5f8795ff1d633e4404e.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Comparison of Disposable Circumcision Suture Device and Conventional Circumcision in Pediatric Surgery: A Five-Year Single Medical Center Experience
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Basic Research
Abstract Category *
Pediatric Urology
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
3
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Wan-Yu Cheng alice880902@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Chia-Cheng Su s940854@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Steven Kuan-Hua Huang skhsteven@yahoo.com.tw Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
The Disposable Circumcision Suture Device (DCSD) has been shown to offer several benefits, including shorter surgery time, faster wound healing, less blood loss, and reduced pain during and after the procedure. It is also associated with a lower risk of infection and swelling and provides better cosmetic outcomes compared to traditional circumcision methods. This study aims to summarize our institution’s five-year experience using DCSD for pediatric circumcision.
Materials and Methods
We conducted a retrospective study of children aged 1 to 12 years who underwent circumcision using either the DCSD or conventional surgical methods between January 2020 and December 2024. Patients who had other concurrent surgeries, such as hernioplasty or orchidopexy, were excluded. We analyzed several factors, including age, BMI, the presence of phimosis or balanoposthitis, type of anesthesia used, operative time, hospital admission rates, and length of hospital stay for those who were admitted.
Results
A total of 117 patients were included in the study, with 91 undergoing circumcision using the DCSD and 26 undergoing the conventional surgical method. There was no significant difference in age (9.2 ± 2.3 vs. 9.1 ± 2.7 years, p = 0.771), phimosis/paraphimosis and balanoposthitis rates between the groups. However, the DCSD group had a significantly lower BMI (17.4 ± 3.3 vs. 19.3 ± 4.4, p = 0.019). The DCSD group had a significantly shorter operative time (28.5 ± 12.3 vs. 42.9 ± 14.0 minutes, p < 0.0001) and tended to have a shorter hospital stay (2.3 ± 0.5 vs. 3.3 ± 1.4 days, p = 0.063). However, there were no significant differences in local anesthesia use (p = 0.579) or admission rates (p = 0.792). Several notable cases were identified. A 2-year-old patient could not undergo DCSD due to a small penile size, necessitating conversion to conventional circumcision. A 7-year-old patient required a switch to traditional circumcision due to severe adhesions and local inflammation. The notable postoperative complication was retained staples, necessitating either outpatient extraction or, in more severe instances, surgical intervention.
Conclusions
DCSD is a safe and efficient method for pediatric circumcision, offering a significantly shorter operative time and a trend toward reduced hospital stay. It provides good aesthetic outcomes with minimal complications, making it a favorable option for managing redundant prepuce and phimosis. Proper patient selection and postoperative care remain essential to optimizing outcomes.
Keywords
Pediatric circumcision, Disposable Circumcision Suture Device, Surgical outcomes
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/36e1254b2d89f4c04026648150f8047a.png
Figure 1 Caption
Table.Table: Perioperative Characteristics of Pediatric Patients Undergoing DCSD and Conventional Circumcision
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2115
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0