Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Evaluation and validation of a disposable uroflowmeter - "P-Flow"
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Novel Advances: New Technology
Author's Information
10
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
India
LOKESH PATNI PATNILOKESHIND@GMAIL.COM INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY UROLOGY DHULE India *
ASHISH V RAWANDALE-PATIL INSTITUTEOFUROLOGY@GMAIL.COM INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY UROLOGY DHULE India -
PREETI A RAWANDALE TEJNAKSH1@GMAIL.COM INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY DHULE India -
KAVAN TAKVANI KAPANTAKVANI163@GMAIL.COM MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL UROLOGY NADIAD India -
ARVIND GANPULE DOCARVIND1@GMAIL.COM MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL UROLOGY NADIAD India -
RAVINDRA B SABNIS RBSABNIS@GMAIL.COM MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL UROLOGY NADIAD India -
ABHISHEK SINGH DRABHISHEKSINGH82@GMAIL.COM MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL UROLOGY NADIAD India -
ABHIJIT PATIL DRABHIP@GMAIL.COM MULJIBHAI PATEL UROLOGICAL HOSPITAL UROLOGY NADIAD India -
RAHUL DHAPPADHULE RAHULDHAPPADHULE5@GMAIL.COM INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY UROLOGY DHULE India -
SANDEEP KURANGAL DRKURANGAL@GMAIL.COM INSTITUTE OF UROLOGY UROLOGY DHULE India -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Uroflowmetry is a common test to evaluate voiding performance and monitor Lower Urinary Tract Symptoms (LUTS). Office-based uroflowmetry has challenges like patient reluctance due to inconvenience, psychological stress, and the need to void in an unaccustomed setup. Portable uroflowmeters have been developed to address these issues. OBJECTIVE: This study aims to validate the newly developed portable uroflowmeter "P-flow" by comparing its results with those obtained using conventional office-based gravimetry uroflowmetry.
P-Flow a novel, portable and disposable device; designed & developed to measure the urine flow. A prospective comparative study was conducted over 12 months, from July 2023 to July 2024. A total of 372 patients attending the outpatient department were included. Uroflowmetry was performed using both conventional gravimetric uroflowmetry and the P-Flow. Key uroflowmetry variables, including voided volume, peak flow rate, average flow rate, total voiding time, and the shape of the uroflowmetry curve, were measured and compared.
The study found no significant differences between the conventional and portable methods in terms of voided volume (271 mL vs. 270 mL, p = 0.440), voided times (40 sec vs. 38 sec, p = 0.204), Q max (15 mL/s vs. 14.4 mL/s, p = 0.210), and average flow rate (9 mL/s vs. 10 mL/s, p = 0.739). Strong positive correlations between variables across both methods were observed, with a high degree of consistency.
The portable P-Flow uroflowmetry kit provides comparable results to conventional methods in assessing lower urinary tract function. It offers a reliable and convenient alternative for home-based monitoring, without compromising diagnostic accuracy. These findings support the potential utility of portable uroflowmetry device (P-Flow) for routine clinical assessments of urinary function. Further research in larger, multi-center studies is recommended to confirm the broader applicability of the P-Flow system
Uroflowmetry, BPH, Stricture Urethra, Voiding Dysfunction, Neurogenic bladder
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/e020f0478c00d49a331689babbe0321f.jpg
P-Flow
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/8ff14d6c211d775eb7c2f6d7da2ddcea.jpg
Sample Report
 
 
 
 
 
 
2972
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(21): BPH & Novel Advances (B)
Aug. 17 (Sun.)
11:42 - 11:48
13