Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
THE DIAGNOSTIC PERFORMANCE OF CXBLADDER TRIAGE PLUS FOR THE IDENTIFICATION AND PRIORITY EVALUATION OF VETERANS AT RISK FOR UROTHELIAL CARCINOMA: THE DRIVE STUDY
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
United States
Tamer Aboushwareb tamer.aboushwareb@pacificedgedx.com Pacific Edge Diagnostics Clinical development Hummelstown United States *
Stephen Savage savages@musc.edu Ralph H. Johnson Veterans Affairs Health Care System, Charleston, SC, USA; Urology Charelston United States -
Tony Lough tony.lough@pelnz.com Pacific Edge Ltd Clinical development Dunedin New Zealand -
Kyoko Sakamoto Kyoko.Sakamoto@va.gov San Diego VA Medical Center, San Diego, CA, USA Urology San Diego United States -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Cxbladder assays are diagnostic urinary biomarker assays that are used for risk stratification for the presence/absence of urothelial carcinoma (UC) among patients presenting with hematuria. Second-generation Cxbladder Triage Plus measures mRNA expression of 5 genes associated with UC, as well as 6 DNA single-nucleotide polymorphisms from FGFR3 and TERT. The DRIVE study evaluated the diagnostic performance of Triage Plus for UC in a Veterans Affairs (VA) population with hematuria.
DRIVE was a multicenter, prospective, observational study that enrolled adults (≥18 years) from VA clinical centers with confirmed hematuria who were undergoing evaluation for possible UC. Patients provided midstream urine samples for testing using the Triage Plus assay. The primary objective was external clinical validation of the diagnostic performance of Triage Plus vs white light cystoscopy, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and test-negative rate (TNR). The gold standard for primary UC diagnosis was pathologic confirmation. The study was designed to achieve 80% power to establish that the lower bound of the 90% confidence interval (CI) for sensitivity was >85%.
Of 615 patients with hematuria (mean age 64.5 years, 90.9% male), 587 had available Triage Plus results. Based on Triage Plus results (score threshold 0.15), 171 patients had an intermediate or high UC risk (of whom 45 had confirmed tumors) and 416 patients were ruled out (of whom only 3 had confirmed tumors; false-negative rate of 0.7%; Table). Compared with the gold standard, Triage Plus had sensitivity of 94% (95% CI 83–99%), specificity of 77% (73–80%), PPV of 26% (20–34%), NPV of 99.3% (97.9–99.9%), and TNR of 71% (67–75%). The performance characteristics of Triage Plus were similar in patients with gross hematuria (n=267) or microhematuria (n=320). When compared with risk stratification by 2025 American Urological Association microhematuria guideline risk criteria or gross hematuria status, Triage Plus had a 3.25-fold (26%/8%) improvement in PPV.
Cxbladder Triage Plus demonstrated clinical validity in this VA population with gross hematuria or microhematuria, with high sensitivity and specificity. These findings indicate that Triage Plus may be safely used to rule out or detect UC in patients with hematuria.
microscopic hematuria, Urothelial carcinoma, Urinary biomarker
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2094
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(08): Oncology Bladder UTUC (B)
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
15:48 - 15:54
4