Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Rejected
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Cohort study of dynamics of inflammatory reaction markers in patients under endourological treatments
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Infectious Disease / Urologic Trauma
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
8
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Russia
Co-author 1
Yuriy Kim Aleksandrovich dockimyura@gmail.com Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia *
Co-author 2
Tyhtasin B. Mahmydov tasintr@mail.ru Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 3
Nikita S. Lykin nlukin071@gmail.com Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 4
Mariya A. Yurlova mari.yurlova@inbox.ru Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 5
Vladislav V. Vaganov vaganov14stunt@mail.ru Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 6
Vigen A. Malkhasyan vigenmalkhasyan@gmail.com A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 7
Che-Hsueh Yang b101098093@tmu.edu.tw Chang Bing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital Department of Urology Changhua Taiwan
Co-author 8
Dmitry Yu. Pushkar pushkardm@mail.ru A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Urolithiasis is one of the most widespread urological diseases and infectious complications remain one of the most common adverse events after surgical interventions for urolithiasis. Currently, in routine clinical practice in most clinics in the country, for the purpose of postoperative control and detection of infectious complications is used: a clinical blood test with assessment of the dynamics of the blood leukocyte count. Unfortunately, the current edition of the clinical guidelines does not contain recommendations on what indicators of postoperative follow-up examinations the clinician should focus on in order to identify infectious and inflammatory complications. For this reason, the study of the value of other markers of the inflammatory response appears to be an actual task.
Materials and Methods
The prospective cohort study included 217 patients diagnosed with urolithiasis and underwent surgical removal of stones by endoscopic method. Of total patient numbers, 43 patients underwent ureteroscopy (URS) with lithotripsy, 152 patients underwent percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PNL), and 22 patients underwent flexible ureterolithotripsy with lithotripsy. An analysis of demographics, clinical parameters and postoperative complications was performed as a descriptive analysis. Patients underwent a standard list of laboratory and instrumental examination methods. The mandatory control of body temperature was carried out 3 times a day, every day. Before surgical treatment, indicators of the content of white blood cell (WBC), lymphocytes (LYMP), C-reactive protein (CRP) and erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) were recorded on the 1st and 2nd day after surgical treatment.
Results
In the postoperative period, an increase in (CRP) and (ESR) was noted both in the fever group and in the normal temperature group, exceeding the reference values already on the first day. At the same time, in the fever group, a significantly higher increase in these indicators was observed (685% vs. 323%) for (CRP) and (146% vs. 80%) for (ESR). According to the results obtained in our study, (CRP) and (ESR) indicators demonstrate the most clinically significant dynamics, increasing by more than 500% and 100%, respectively.
Conclusions
Endoscopic urinary calculus removal is a safe treatment option in patients with sterile urine cultures. After endoscopic stone removal, all patients experience such reactive changes in peripheral blood parameters as: an increase in the level of leukocytes, lymphopenia, an increase in (ESR) and (CRP) levels. Indicators of (CRP) and (ESR) demonstrate the most clinically indicative dynamics.
Keywords
Biomarkers; Kidney Calculi/ diagnosis; Ureteral Calculi; Urolithiasis / diagnosis
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2596
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order