Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Optimizing Biopsy Core Number in MRI-Fusion Prostate Biopsy: A Single-Center Experience
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
10
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Po-Han Chen drpohanchen@gmail.com Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Department of Medical Education Taoyuan City Taiwan *
Co-author 2
I-Hung Shao ehomeshao68@gmail.com Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Tsung-Lin Lee leechunglin@cgmh.org.tw Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Liang-Kang Huang m1126@cgmh.org.tw Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Hung-Cheng Kan m0320@cgmh.org.tw Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Po-Hung Lin po.hung.lin@cgmh.org.tw Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 7
Kai-Jie Yu m7398@cgmh.org.tw Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 8
Cheng-Keng Chuang chuang89@cgmh.org.tw Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 9
See-Tong Pang jacobpang@cgmh.org.tw Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 10
Chun-Te Wu wucgmh@gmail.com Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou Branch Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Taoyuan City Taiwan -
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
With multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging (mpMRI), MRI-fusion biopsy (MRFB) detects clinically significant prostate cancer (csPca) more effectively than transrectal ultrasound (TRUS)-guided systematic biopsy. However, current guidelines lack consensus on the optimal number of cores per lesion. This study aims to provide evidence-based recommendations for reducing the number of biopsy cores while maintaining optimal diagnostic efficacy.
Materials and Methods
From May 2023 to August 2024, we included patients who underwent MRFB with paired systematic biopsy, excluding those without a separately sampled first core, duplicates, or incomplete data. During MRFB, the first core of each target lesion was submitted separately, while the remaining targeted cores were grouped. For patients with multiple lesions, only the lesion with the highest PI-RADS score had its first core sampled separately. The diagnostic efficacy of the targeted first core, targeted remaining cores, and paired systematic biopsy in detecting prostate cancer was compared. Statistical analyses included descriptive statistics, the Mann-Whitney U test, the Kruskal-Wallis test, and the chi-square test to compare diagnostic efficacy. Logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of a positive first core result for prostate cancer (Pca) and csPca. All data were analyzed using MedCalc Statistical Software version 22.009.
Results
The targeted first core biopsy demonstrated non-inferiority to the targeted remaining cores (3.17 ± 1.27 cores per lesion) across multiple metrics, including the Pca detection rate (45.1% vs. 52.2%, p = 0.29), csPca detection rate (29.2% vs. 33.6%, p = 0.47), Gleason score (6.94 vs. 6.90, p = 0.86), positive Pca percentage (43.1% vs. 41.3%, p = 0.72), and positive csPca percentage (28.1% vs. 28.1%, p = 0.87). Multivariate logistic regression identified age (OR = 1.15, 95% CI: 1.03–1.27, p < 0.001), serum PSA level (OR = 1.11, 95% CI: 1.03–1.20, p < 0.01), and PI-RADS score (OR = 4.26, 95% CI: 1.47–12.34, p < 0.01) as independent predictors of a positive first core biopsy result for csPca. Among patients meeting all three criteria—age ≥ 65 years, PSA ≥ 15 ng/mL, and PI-RADS ≥ 4—the targeted first core biopsy detected Pca in 100% and csPca in 94% of those ultimately diagnosed, demonstrating high diagnostic accuracy in this high-risk subgroup.
Conclusions
The targeted first core biopsy is non-inferior to the targeted remaining cores in detecting both Pca and csPca. In patients meeting all three criteria—age ≥ 65 years, PSA ≥ 15 ng/mL, and PI-RADS ≥ 4—two cores per lesion may be sufficient for accurate diagnosis during MRFB.
Keywords
MRI-fusion Biopsy, Biopsy Cores, Diagnostic Efficacy, Prostate Cancer, Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2343
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(07): Oncology Prostate (B)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
13:36 - 13:42
Presentation Order
2