Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
The efficacy and safety of bilateral single-session ureteroscopy for bilateral urolithiasis: a systematic review
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Meta Analysis / Systematic Review
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Kunind Oberoi kunindoberoi12@gmail.com The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery Melbourne Australia *
Co-author 2
Zein Alhamdani zeinalhamdani@gmail.com Austin Health, University of Melbourne Department of Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 3
Oscar McGraw mcgrawoscar@gmail.com The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 4
Dan Lenaghan danlenaghan@gmail.com St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd Department of Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 5
Kapil Sethi drkapilsethi@gmail.com Austin Health, University of Melbourne Department of Urology Melbourne Australia - St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne Pty Ltd Department of Urology Melbourne Australia The University of Melbourne Department of Surgery Melbourne Australia
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
This systematic review evaluates the efficacy and safety of bilateral single-session ureteroscopy (BSS-URS) in treating bilateral urolithiasis, focusing on primary outcomes such as stone-free rate (SFR), complication rate, operative time, and hospital stay.
Materials and Methods
A systematic search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and CENTRAL databases was conducted, identifying 476 papers. 18 studies from 2012 to 2024 comprising of 2,904 patients (1918 male, 986 female) were included in the final review. Data on patient demographics, procedural outcomes, and complications were extracted and analyzed.
Results
2,294 patients underwent BSS-URS, while 610 underwent the traditional staged unilateral ureteroscopy (SU-URS). The mean age of all patients was 43.2 years, average body mass index (BMI) was 27.0 kg/m2 and average stone burden was 18.8 mm. The overall mean SFR for BSS-URS was 85.1% while the overall mean SFR for SU-URS was 85.5%. The mean operative time for BSS-URS was 74.4 minutes for both renal units while the mean operative time for SU-URS was 46.2 minutes per single renal unit. The mean hospital stay duration for BSS-URS was 33.5 hours, while for SU-URS it was 34.6 hours. The overall complication rate for BSS-URS was 28.3% with 87.2% of all complications being minor (Clavien-Dindo I & II). Major complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥IIIa) occurred in 3.6% of all cases with urosepsis requiring ICU admission being the most common (1.2%). No patients had Clavien-Dindo grade IVb and V complications.
Conclusions
BSS-URS is a safe and effective treatment for bilateral urolithiasis, offering advantages in reduced accumulative hospital stay and operative time with comparable SFR. While the overall complication rate for BSS-URS remains slightly elevated, most complications are minor, with serious complications being rare and manageable. However, inconsistencies in SFR outcome definitions and reliance on high-volume centers highlight the need for standardization and further prospective studies to validate its widespread adoption.
Keywords
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/106f06bc5d77faa39cd6028717a0d0d5.png
Figure 1 Caption
PRISMA flow chart
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c88443327c6ffc4a868bbc51eda1f773.jpg
Figure 2 Caption
Pie distribution of Clavien-Dindo complications with nested Grade I complications
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2997
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order