Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
The comparison of robotic-assisted and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy in non-metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Bladder and UTUC
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Yu-Chieh Wang jay0601070@gmail.com Taichung Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taichung Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Jian-Ri Li fisherfishli@yahoo.com.tw Taichung Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taichung Taiwan - National Chung Hsing University Department of Post-baccalaureate Medicine Taichung Taiwan Hung-Kuang University College of Nursing Taichung Taiwan
Co-author 3
Chuan-Shu Chen r2060d@gmail.com Taichung Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taichung Taiwan - National Chung Hsing University Department of Post-baccalaureate Medicine Taichung Taiwan Chung Shan Medical University Institute of Medicine Taichung Taiwan
Co-author 4
Shian-Shiang Wang urologyssw@gmail.com Taichung Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taichung Taiwan - National Chung Hsing University Department of Post-baccalaureate Medicine Taichung Taiwan Institute of Medicine Chung Shan Medical University Taichung Taiwan
Co-author 5
Cheng-Kuang Yang yangck@icloud.com Taichung Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taichung Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Kun-Yuan Chiu chiu37782002@yahoo.com Taichung Veterans General Hospital Department of Urology Taichung Taiwan -
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
As robotic surgery has been widely utilized in urological surgeries, there was an emerging trend toward robotic-assisted approach in managing Upper tract urothelial carcinoma(UTUC). The current evidence of robotic-assisted radical nephroureterectomy(RRNU) is still conflicting. Our study aimed to compare the perioperative outcomes and oncological outcomes between RRNU and laparoscopic radical nephroureterectomy(LRNU)
Materials and Methods
In this retrospective cohort study, we analyzed 442 patients diagnosed with UTUC without distant metastasis who had been treated with nephroureterectomy via robotic-assisted or laparoscopic approach. The information including baseline, surgery and tumor characteristics of patients was collected based on our database. Perioperative outcomes were compared between RRNU and LRNU groups and analyzed by chi-square test. Oncological outcomes including overall survival(OS), recurrence-free survival(RFS) and distant metastasis free survival (DFS) were assessed with Kaplan-Meier analysis. The hazard ratio for OS of RRNU was analyzed using the multivariate Cox regression hazards model.
Results
There were a total of 391 patients meet the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis (RRNU: 83, LRNU: 308). Regarding the perioperative outcomes, RRNU group with the advantage of longer readmission days and lesser emergency readmission in 30 days. Major complication rate was lower in RRNU group (1.2% vs 4.2%), however, no significant difference was revealed. RRNU demonstrated with a superior oncological outcomes compared to LRNU. The OS at 5 years was 95.2%(RRNU) and 82.5%(LRNU), with a significant difference between the two groups (P= 0.004). Kaplan–Meier analysis revealed a significant disparity in OS, but not in RFS and DFS. RRNU was also associated with better OS (HR: 0.35, P=0.044) after multivariable cox regression analysis.
Conclusions
RRNU had superiority not only in perioperative outcomes but also oncological outcomes in managing non-metastatic UTUC. Therefore, RRNU demonstrated better safety and efficacy, and should be widely adopted as a first-line surgery approach.
Keywords
Upper tract urothelial carcinoma; Nephroureterectomy
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/537e61f687adca0546ae4cb1409b1437.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Perioperative and surgical outcome
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/9a8336333c98f74850b36c4a2f57f7e8.jpg
Figure 2 Caption
Univariable and multivariable Cox regression analysis of Overall survival
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/183e75429b35d8f6689c60fbb7efe9a0.png
Figure 3 Caption
Oncologic survival for RRNU and LRNU with the Kaplan–Meier method. Numbers at risk after 5 years are as follows: overall survival—RRNU 92.3 and LRNU 77.70, log-rank p = 0.014
Figure 4
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/66b5bf1a76621db873023afae260ea16.png
Figure 4 Caption
Oncologic survival for RRNU and LRNU with the Kaplan–Meier method. Numbers at risk after 5 years are as follows: recurrence— RRNU 36.3 and LRNU 44.1, log-rank p = 0.719
Figure 5
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/b2d06aa5e33c8771ec1a47eb07422088.jpg
Figure 5 Caption
Oncologic survival for RRNU and LRNU with the Kaplan–Meier method. Numbers at risk after 5 years are as follows: distant metastasis—RRNU 89.4 and LRNU 76.7, log-rank p = 0.490
Character Count
1860
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(03): Oncology Bladder UTUC (A)
Date
Aug. 14 (Thu.)
Time
16:24 - 16:30
Presentation Order
10