Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
A comparative analysis of the learning curve fibrocystoscopy under local anesthesia in men in a urology resident training program
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Training and Education
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
7
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Russia
Co-author 1
Yuriy Kim Aleksandrovich dockimyura@gmail.com Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia *
Co-author 2
Nikita S. Lykin nlukin071@gmail.com Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 3
Mariya A. Yurlova mari.yurlova@inbox.ru Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 4
Vladislav V. Vaganov vaganov14stunt@mail.ru Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 5
Vigen A. Malkhasyan vigenmalkhasyan@gmail.com Botkin Hospital Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 6
Che-Hsueh Yang b101098093@tmu.edu.tw Changbing Show Chwan Memorial Hospital Department of Urology Changhua Taiwan
Co-author 7
Dmitry Yu. Pushkar pushkardm@mail.ru A.I. Evdokimov Moscow State University of Medicine and Dentistry Department of Urology Moscow Russia
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
This study aimed to provide an analysis of the quality of fibrocystoscopy performance and the importance of training technique.
Materials and Methods
A prospective comparative randomized study was conducted. Randomization was performed in groups randomly using the random number method (https://www.randomizer.org/). A total of 42 patients were included in the study from September 2024 to November 2024. The study included patients aged 54 to 82 years with diagnoses of prostatic hyperplasia, bladder stones, urethoracic reflux. We divided patients into 2 groups depending on the operator's experience: a urology resident of the 1st year of training (group 1) and a clinical resident of the 2nd year of training (group 2). Patients were asked to indicate their perception of pain after the procedure on a VAS scale, which then allowed us to quantify the assessment as a percentage from 0 to 100%.
Results
The time to perform the diagnostic procedure in group 1 averaged 5 minutes (p < 0.001), in group 2 - 3 minutes (p < 0.001). When analyzing the severity of pain in patients after the procedure on a VAS scale: in group 1, the average indicator was from 4 to 7 cm, which is from 40% to 70% (p < 0.001), in group 2, the indicator was up to 4 cm, which is up to 40% (p < 0.001).
Conclusions
The analysis demonstrated a shorter time and painless fibrocystoscopy in 2nd year residents, thanks to the experience of cystoscopy and fibrocystoscopy. In 1-year residents, by the 14th fibrocystoscopy, pain syndrome significantly decreases according to the VAS scale and is no more than 40%. In the 1st group, by the 15th clinical case, the time for performing fibrocystoscopy significantly decreases and does not exceed 4 minutes (p < 0.001).
Keywords
learning curve; fibrocystoscopy; resident, urologist resident.
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1691
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order