Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/7da088bc51d6eba452df799a5efd8375.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c7aeda096c75d8d30f372f752a174496.png
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Comparative Study of Ureteral Access Sheath versus Suction Access Sheath in Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
6
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Ting-Yi Chiang ttim.com@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan City Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Kau-Han Lee kauhan@hotmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan City Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Chia-Chih Hsieh mnmnmn1994@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan City Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Zhi-Hao Chen ted0112358@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan City Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Steven K. Huang 7224837@gmail.com Chi Mei Medical Center Division of Urology, Department of Surgery Tainan City Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Allen W. Chiu whchiu1216@gmail.com Shin Kong Wu Ho-Su Memorial Hospital Department of Urology Taipei Taiwan -
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) is a minimally invasive technique for managing renal and upper ureteral stones. Ureteral access sheaths (UAS) facilitate instrument access and reduce intrarenal pressure, but their impact on stone-free rates (SFR) remains debated. Suction ureteral access sheaths (S-UAS) offer improved flexibility and can be connected to suction devices, enhancing stone fragment removal. This study aims to compare the outcomes of traditional UAS and S-UAS in RIRS.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective cohort study was conducted at Chimei Medical Center from January 2022 to December 2024, including 104 patients who underwent RIRS with either traditional UAS (n=53) or S-UAS (n=51). Baseline characteristics, operative time, stone-free rates (SFR), postoperative complications, and the need for auxiliary procedures were analyzed. Subgroup analyses assessed the impact of stone size, location, and number on outcomes.
Results
Immediate SFR was significantly higher in the S-UAS group (82.0%) compared to the traditional UAS group (60.4%) (p=0.016). At one month, no significant difference was observed between the groups. The S-UAS group required fewer auxiliary procedures (5.9% vs. 22.6%, p=0.015) and demonstrated a higher SFR for lower calyx stones (81.8% vs. 55.2%, p=0.046). Operative time, hospital stay, and complication rates were similar between groups. The incidence of postoperative sepsis was higher in the S-UAS group, though other complications remained comparable.
Conclusions
The S-UAS offers significant benefits over traditional UAS in improving immediate SFR, particularly in challenging stone cases. Despite a higher rate of postoperative sepsis, S-UAS appears to be a safe and effective option for RIRS, reducing the need for auxiliary procedures and enhancing procedural efficiency. Further studies are needed to evaluate long-term outcomes and refine patient selection for optimal results.
Keywords
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery (RIRS), Suction Ureteral Access Sheath (S-UAS), Traditional Ureteral Access Sheath (UAS), Stone-Free Rate (SFR)
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1474
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0