Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Complication rates and outcomes of suction devices in retrograde intrarenal surgery for adults with renal and upper ureteral stones: a systematic review
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Meta Analysis / Systematic Review
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Australia
Co-author 1
Daniel Crisafi danieljakecrisafi@gmail.com Austin Health Urology Melbourne Australia *
Co-author 2
Sam Sii danieljakecrisafi@gmail.com Austin Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 3
Anne Hong danieljakecrisafi@gmail.com Austin Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 4
Greg Jack danieljakecrisafi@gmail.com Austin Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 5
Damien Bolton danieljakecrisafi@gmail.com Austin Hospital Urology Melbourne Australia -
Co-author 6
-
Co-author 7
-
Co-author 8
-
Co-author 9
-
Co-author 10
-
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
The advent of suction technology in retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) promises to overcome commonly encountered issues including poor visibility, residual fragments and elevated intra-renal pressures (IRP) causing infectious complications. This systematic review evaluates the safety profile and efficacy of novel suction devices compared to current practices in the management of renal and upper ureteral stones in the adult population.
Materials and Methods
A systematic search of the literature was conducted on 21th December 2024 using Embase, Medline and Scopus. Only English papers involving adult populations with typical anatomy were accepted.
Results
Thiry-four articles were deemed suitable for the purposes of this review. Various methods of suction-assisted RIRS have been described, including suction ureteral access sheaths (S-UAS), tip-flexible suction ureteral access sheaths (TFS-UAS), direct in scope suction (DISS) and aspiration catheters, as a means to improve the safety and efficacy of RIRS. Suction devices have shown significant advantages by vacuuming debris to improve visibility and maximise stone clearance, even for larger stones typically managed by percutaneous nephrolithotomy. Improved stone-free rates, shorter operating times, less requirement for basketing and fewer auxiliary surgeries have subsequently been observed. Use of intelligent pressure monitoring has the added benefit of maintaining low IRP intra-operatively, which reduces infectious complications like fever and sepsis. These techniques may offer substantial health economic benefits by reducing operating time, intra-operative costs and hospital stays. However, the lack of high-level evidence limits the standardisation of this technology, currently.
Conclusions
Suction technology in RIRS optimises stone clearance and reduces complication rates by improving visibility for surgeons, evacuating debris and also maintaining low IRP. With further research, it promises to be a useful adjunct to current practices.
Keywords
suction ureteral access sheaths, retrograde intrarenal surgery
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1980
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order