Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/b270dd4c9bdeddf6ceca51fc67478bb1.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/f43757817fb83890cf15bc5e4f8d26a1.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Retrospective analysis of five scoring systems for predicting stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): Insights from preoperative CT Scans
Moderated Poster Abstract
Clinical Research
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Taiwan
Shao-Chen Su karta1469356@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan *
Yi-Sheng Lin tung12197@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
Chao-Yu Hsu jowyu@msn.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
Yen-Chuan Ou ycou228@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
Min-Che Tung tungminche@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Previous studies have explored various scoring systems using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to predict the postoperative stone-free rate (SFR) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, data on their applicability to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) remains limited. In this study, we aim to evaluate the predictive accuracy of five existing scoring systems for achieving stone-free status after RIRS.
We retrospectively collected all patients who underwent RIRS between January 2023 and December 2023 from one single institution. For each patient, scores were assigned with preoperative CT scan under five scoring systems (i.e., Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., CROES, R.I.R.S., SMASH). Stone free status was defined as no residual renal stones over 3mm in diameter on KUB within 1 month postoperatively. Comparison of the stone-free cohort and stone-residual cohort was performed with standard statistical methods. Areas under curves (AUC) of Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also calculated to compare the predictive value for each scoring system.
A total of 115 patients were enrolled in the study. Overall stone free rate was 60.9%. Mean Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., CROES, R.I.R.S., SMASH scores were 1.97, 6.77, 181.08, 6.61, and 12.2, respectively. AUCs of ROC curve for each scoring systems were 0.752 [95%CI: 0.661–0.843] for GUY’s score, 0.726 [95%CI: 0.627–0.825] for S.T.O.N.E score, 0.788 [95%CI: 0.702–0.874] for CROES, 0.786 [95%CI: 0.698–0.874] for R.I.R.S. scores and 0.764 [95%CI: 0.676–0.852] for SMASH scores. All scores except for GUY’s score (p=0.2597) differed between the stone-free and stone-residual cohorts. 10 patients (8.7%) received re-intervention within 6 months postoperatively.
For RIRS, All the scoring systems except for GUY’s score showed reliable predictive performance for the stone free status, while CROES nephrolithometric nomogram held the highest sensitivity.
RIRS; Stone free rate (SFR); Scoring systems; CT scan
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/54077d03c15c0fcd091c0e841382dd32.jpg
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, including the five scoring systems (Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., CROES, R.I.R.S., SMASH)
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/01368d6877c567130712df256efcf442.jpg
AUC of ROC for the five scoring systems to predict the stone-free rate
 
 
 
 
 
 
1733
 
Presentation Details
 
 
 
0