Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/b270dd4c9bdeddf6ceca51fc67478bb1.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/f43757817fb83890cf15bc5e4f8d26a1.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Retrospective analysis of five scoring systems for predicting stone-free status after retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS): Insights from preoperative CT Scans
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
5
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Shao-Chen Su karta1469356@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Yi-Sheng Lin tung12197@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Chao-Yu Hsu jowyu@msn.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Yen-Chuan Ou ycou228@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Min-Che Tung tungminche@gmail.com Tung's taichung metroharbor hospital Department of Urology Taichung City Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Previous studies have explored various scoring systems using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scans to predict the postoperative stone-free rate (SFR) following percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL). However, data on their applicability to retrograde intrarenal surgery (RIRS) remains limited. In this study, we aim to evaluate the predictive accuracy of five existing scoring systems for achieving stone-free status after RIRS.
Materials and Methods
We retrospectively collected all patients who underwent RIRS between January 2023 and December 2023 from one single institution. For each patient, scores were assigned with preoperative CT scan under five scoring systems (i.e., Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., CROES, R.I.R.S., SMASH). Stone free status was defined as no residual renal stones over 3mm in diameter on KUB within 1 month postoperatively. Comparison of the stone-free cohort and stone-residual cohort was performed with standard statistical methods. Areas under curves (AUC) of Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was also calculated to compare the predictive value for each scoring system.
Results
A total of 115 patients were enrolled in the study. Overall stone free rate was 60.9%. Mean Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., CROES, R.I.R.S., SMASH scores were 1.97, 6.77, 181.08, 6.61, and 12.2, respectively. AUCs of ROC curve for each scoring systems were 0.752 [95%CI: 0.661–0.843] for GUY’s score, 0.726 [95%CI: 0.627–0.825] for S.T.O.N.E score, 0.788 [95%CI: 0.702–0.874] for CROES, 0.786 [95%CI: 0.698–0.874] for R.I.R.S. scores and 0.764 [95%CI: 0.676–0.852] for SMASH scores. All scores except for GUY’s score (p=0.2597) differed between the stone-free and stone-residual cohorts. 10 patients (8.7%) received re-intervention within 6 months postoperatively.
Conclusions
For RIRS, All the scoring systems except for GUY’s score showed reliable predictive performance for the stone free status, while CROES nephrolithometric nomogram held the highest sensitivity.
Keywords
RIRS; Stone free rate (SFR); Scoring systems; CT scan
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/54077d03c15c0fcd091c0e841382dd32.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Patient demographics and clinical characteristics, including the five scoring systems (Guy's, S.T.O.N.E., CROES, R.I.R.S., SMASH)
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/01368d6877c567130712df256efcf442.jpg
Figure 2 Caption
AUC of ROC for the five scoring systems to predict the stone-free rate
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1733
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order
0