Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/53fddf941880c64331b1960334a6e2ff.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/549c01af73603e607b543715c4183130.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Gleason Score Upgrading in Grade Group 1 Prostate Cancer: Insights from a Retrospective Cohort Study
Presentation Type
Moderated Poster Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
7
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Shih-Hsien Kuo 1900pianosteven@gmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Yung-Chun Su joe19960301@gmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan
Co-author 3
Kevin Lu kevinlu0620@mail2000.com.tw Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan
Co-author 4
Hsiang-Ying Lee ashum1009@hotmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan
Co-author 5
Yung-Shun Juan juanuro@gmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan
Co-author 6
Ching-Chia Li ccli1010@hotmail.com Kaohsiung Medical University Gangshan Hospital Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan
Co-author 7
Wen-Jeng Wu wejewu@kmu.edu.tw Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital & College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University Department of Urology Kaohsiung city Taiwan
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Patients with an initial biopsy-confirmed Gleason score (GS) 3+3 prostate cancer (PCa) (Grade Group 1) are typically categorized as having low-risk disease. However, a subset may experience Gleason score progression upon final pathology after radical prostatectomy (RP), which can alter prognosis and treatment strategies. This study aims to identify predictors of Gleason score progression from an initial GS of 3+3 and to evaluate the associated clinical outcomes, including biochemical recurrence.
Materials and Methods
A retrospective cohort of men with biopsy-confirmed GS 3+3 PCa who underwent RP was analyzed. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board at Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital. Only patients with both initial biopsy and final pathology data were included, while those without complete follow-up data were excluded. Data collected from electronic health records included patient demographics, clinical variables such as Prostate-Specific Antigen (PSA) levels, PSA density, and prostate volume (PV), as well as final pathology findings. Multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) data were incorporated when available. The primary outcome was Gleason score progression, defined as an upgrade to 3+4, 4+3, or higher on final pathology. Secondary outcomes included biochemical recurrence (PSA ≥ 0.2 ng/mL) and overall survival.
Results
A total of 121 men met inclusion criteria. Gleason score progression occurred in 78 (64.5%) patients following RP. Patients with GS upgrading had significantly higher PSA density and smaller PV compared to those who remained at GS 3+3. Multivariate analysis identified older age (p=0.0147), smaller PV (p=0.0049), and perineural invasion (PNI) (p=0.0155) as independent predictors of GS progression. Biochemical recurrence occurred in 35 patients (28.9%), and these patients had significantly elevated pre-biopsy PSA levels and higher PSA density compared to non-recurrent patients. PNI was also more frequent in patients with biochemical recurrence.
Conclusions
Gleason score upgrading and biochemical recurrence are significant considerations in patients initially diagnosed with GS 3+3 prostate cancer. Older age, smaller prostate volume, and PNI were strong predictors of Gleason score upgrading, while elevated pre-biopsy PSA levels were associated with increased risk of biochemical recurrence. These findings emphasize the need for enhanced risk stratification in low-risk PCa patients to guide management decisions.
Keywords
Prostate cancer, Radical prostatectomy
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1974
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Moderated Poster(03): Oncology Prostate (A)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
13:40 - 13:44
Presentation Order
1