Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Non-Moderated Poster Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/533252f8728edbfd5dd934d06addc092.pdf
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/f1cdd220ba1076c79926c1f6393a4b90.jpg
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Outcomes of salvage percutaneous nephrolithostripsy after first attempt failure: A retrospective study
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Endourology: Urolithiasis
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
3
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Vietnam
Co-author 1
Nguyen Huynh Dang Khoa dangkhoayds777@gmail.com University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city Urology Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam *
Co-author 2
Nguyen Ngoc Thai nguyenngocthai@ump.edu.vn University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city Urology HO CHI MINH CITY Vietnam
Co-author 3
Do Anh Toan doanhtoan@ump.edu.vn University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh city Urology Ho Chi Minh City Vietnam
Co-author 4
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Percutaneous nephrolithotripsy (PCNL) is currently the predominant treatment modality for renal stones larger than 20 mm. However, due to various multifactorial reasons, a considerable number of cases with residual calculi post-PCNL exist. Nowadays, comprehensive data regarding the characteristics of cases with residual stones following the first PCNL and the supplementary outcomes of salvage PCNL are still inadequate.
Materials and Methods
This retrospective analysis included 72 patients who underwent salvage percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) between January 2020 and January 2023 after the initial procedure. Information regarding patient's demographic, characteristics of the calculi, reasons for failure, and outcomes following treatment, including stone-free rates and complications according to the Clavien-Dindo system, were documented for the second-look intervention.
Results
The primary causes of initial procedure failure were prolonged operative time (68.06%), unsuitable target calyx (9.72%), intraoperative infection (11.11%), planned staged procedures (5.56%), and significant hemorrhage (5.56%). Following the salvage PCNL, the overall stone-free rate was 55.41%. Multivariate logistic regression analysis identified the presence of multiple stones (OR = 6.434, p = 0.015) and Guy’s stone score 4 (OR = 11.620, p = 0.01) as independent predictors of persistent residual stones following the second intervention. For postoperative outcomes of second procedures, 80.56% of cases were free from complications, with no reported grade 3B or above events. Performing a second PCNL during the same hospitalization reduced hospital stay duration and antibiotic use compared to procedures conducted during separate admissions.
Conclusions
Patients with residual stones after primary PCNL face anatomical and procedural challenges that impede complete stone clearance. Salvage PCNL yielded a stone-free rate of 55.41%, with multiple calculi and a higher Guy’s stone score increasing the chance of residual fragments. These results highlight the importance of thorough preoperative assessment, customized surgical planning, and intraoperative optimization to improve the effectiveness of secondary PCNL in patients with ongoing nephrolithiasis.
Keywords
Percutaneous nephrolithostripsy, salvage procedure, residual stone.
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/6f526f5b4432d560b6e4525e41d0a1a0.jpg
Figure 1 Caption
Demographic and stone data of patients (N=72)
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/bfacd3f964d3477df237a2afb230e127.jpg
Figure 2 Caption
Reasons for residual stone after first (N=72, figure A) and second (N=32, figure B) PCNL
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/325eef8c4ed2d9ca7969226a11c54a0e.jpg
Figure 3 Caption
The characteristic of first and second PCNL (N=72)
Figure 4
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/99160a858a6768fc282d950c96d3975c.jpg
Figure 4 Caption
The comparison of two group base on the time of second procedure (N=72)
Figure 5
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/8113e5a38c88c22dfab553ebfa736c40.jpg
Figure 5 Caption
Multivariate logistic regression of factors for residual stone after second procedure
Character Count
1710
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Date
Time
Presentation Order