Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy based on a noninvasive diagnostic strategy: a prospective single center study
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
China
Co-author 1
Tao tao taotao_urology@126.com The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China *
Co-author 2
Changming Wang wcmurologist@ustc.edu.cn The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China
Co-author 3
Yifan Ma sa23911022@mail.ustc.edu.cn The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China
Co-author 4
Jun Xiao anhuiurology@126.com The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Prostate biopsy is the most common approach for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa); however, it has inherent limitations, such as the invasive procedure, postoperative complications, and false negative results. We aimed to provide a noninvasive diagnostic strategy for patients with highly suspected PCa and to evaluate the feasibility of performing biopsy-spared radical prostatectomy.
Materials and Methods
This prospective study included a total of 57 patients between November 10, 2022, and December 1, 2023. All 57 patients underwent radical prostatectomy without prior prostate biopsy based on a noninvasive diagnostic strategy consisting of a diagnostic prediction model [comprised of the prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD)] and the 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) examination. The primary endpoint was the positive predictive value (PPV) of clinically significant PCa [the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2, Gleason score ≥3 + 4]. The secondary endpoints were a PPV of any-grade PCa (ISUP grade ≥ 1, Gleason score ≥3+3) and high-grade PCa (ISUP grade ≥3, Gleason score ≥4+3), and the false positive rate of the diagnostic strategy.
Results
Of the 371 screened patients with clinically suspected PCa, 57 patients fulfilled the criteria and consented to participate in this study. The median PSAD level was 0.56 (0.42–0.82) ng/mL2; 13 (22.8%) patients were identified as having a PI-RADS score of 4, and 44 (77.2%) patients with a PI-RADS score of 5. The median SUVmax of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was 21.6 (15.8–33.0). For the 57 enrolled patients who received radical prostatectomy directly, the PPV of clinically significant PCa was 98.2% [56/57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 90.6–100%]. Only 1.8% (1/57, 95% CI: 0.0–9.4%) of patients were diagnosed with clinically insignificant PCa (ISUP grade =1, Gleason score=3+3). The PPV of any-grade PCa and high-grade PCa were 100% and 73.7% (42/57, 95% CI: 60.3–84.5%), respectively. No one had a false positive result.
Conclusions
We proposed a noninvasive diagnostic strategy consisting sequentially of a diagnostic prediction model and the 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examination for diagnosing PCa. Despite some limitations, our initial findings suggest the potential feasibility of radical prostatectomy without prior prostate biopsy.
Keywords
Prostate cancer, noninvasive diagnostic, biopsy, PSAD
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/96ba9c12435dc6c97d4a9ec14f94baf2.png
Figure 1 Caption
Study flow diagram
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/7a787aa5fa1252742214b9cdb15cad93.png
Figure 2 Caption
A case example of a 67-year-old man
Figure 3
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/b29eaafaf2b09d3709c270552b0f0e80.png
Figure 3 Caption
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics
Figure 4
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c03f358766b34074858368b1b3cdd17b.png
Figure 4 Caption
Results of postoperative pathology
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
2411
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(12): Oncology Prostate (C)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
16:54 - 17:00
Presentation Order
15