Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Radical prostatectomy without prostate biopsy based on a noninvasive diagnostic strategy: a prospective single center study
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
4
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
China
Tao tao taotao_urology@126.com The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China *
Changming Wang wcmurologist@ustc.edu.cn The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China
Yifan Ma sa23911022@mail.ustc.edu.cn The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China
Jun Xiao anhuiurology@126.com The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC Department of urology Hefei China
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Prostate biopsy is the most common approach for diagnosing prostate cancer (PCa); however, it has inherent limitations, such as the invasive procedure, postoperative complications, and false negative results. We aimed to provide a noninvasive diagnostic strategy for patients with highly suspected PCa and to evaluate the feasibility of performing biopsy-spared radical prostatectomy.
This prospective study included a total of 57 patients between November 10, 2022, and December 1, 2023. All 57 patients underwent radical prostatectomy without prior prostate biopsy based on a noninvasive diagnostic strategy consisting of a diagnostic prediction model [comprised of the prostate imaging-reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen density (PSAD)] and the 18F-prostate-specific membrane antigen (PSMA)-1007 positron emission tomography (PET)/ computed tomography (CT) examination. The primary endpoint was the positive predictive value (PPV) of clinically significant PCa [the International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade ≥2, Gleason score ≥3 + 4]. The secondary endpoints were a PPV of any-grade PCa (ISUP grade ≥ 1, Gleason score ≥3+3) and high-grade PCa (ISUP grade ≥3, Gleason score ≥4+3), and the false positive rate of the diagnostic strategy.
Of the 371 screened patients with clinically suspected PCa, 57 patients fulfilled the criteria and consented to participate in this study. The median PSAD level was 0.56 (0.42–0.82) ng/mL2; 13 (22.8%) patients were identified as having a PI-RADS score of 4, and 44 (77.2%) patients with a PI-RADS score of 5. The median SUVmax of 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT was 21.6 (15.8–33.0). For the 57 enrolled patients who received radical prostatectomy directly, the PPV of clinically significant PCa was 98.2% [56/57, 95% confidence interval (CI): 90.6–100%]. Only 1.8% (1/57, 95% CI: 0.0–9.4%) of patients were diagnosed with clinically insignificant PCa (ISUP grade =1, Gleason score=3+3). The PPV of any-grade PCa and high-grade PCa were 100% and 73.7% (42/57, 95% CI: 60.3–84.5%), respectively. No one had a false positive result.
We proposed a noninvasive diagnostic strategy consisting sequentially of a diagnostic prediction model and the 18F-PSMA-1007 PET/CT examination for diagnosing PCa. Despite some limitations, our initial findings suggest the potential feasibility of radical prostatectomy without prior prostate biopsy.
Prostate cancer, noninvasive diagnostic, biopsy, PSAD
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/96ba9c12435dc6c97d4a9ec14f94baf2.png
Study flow diagram
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/7a787aa5fa1252742214b9cdb15cad93.png
A case example of a 67-year-old man
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/b29eaafaf2b09d3709c270552b0f0e80.png
Baseline demographic and clinical characteristics
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/c03f358766b34074858368b1b3cdd17b.png
Results of postoperative pathology
 
 
2411
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(12): Oncology Prostate (C)
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
16:54 - 17:00
15