Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Reducing Unnecessary Biopsies in PI-RADS 3-4 Lesions Through PSA-Derived Biomarker Integration: A Decision Curve Analysis
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Oncology: Prostate
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
10
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Taiwan
Co-author 1
Jen-Hao Kuo thomas42913@gmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan *
Co-author 2
Yin-Chien Ou i54921051@gmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 3
Che-Yuan Hu greatoldhu@gmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 4
Kuan-Yu Wu hn85386039@gmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 5
Chan-Jung Liu dragon2043@hotmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 6
Hau-Chern Jan jan.hauchern@gmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 7
Kun-Che Lin typemoondenike@gmail.com National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 8
Yi-Chia Hsieh i54006160@gs.ncku.edu.tw National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 9
Chien-Hui Ou donou1969@yahoo.com.tw National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 10
Yuh-Shyan Tsai youh@mail.ncku.edu.tw National Cheng Kung University Hospital, College of Medicine, National Cheng Kung University Department of Urology Tainan Taiwan -
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is a leading malignancy among men, yet identifying clinically significant PCa (csPCa) remains challenging. Despite advances with mpMRI and PI-RADS scoring, PI-RADS 3 and 4 lesions still result in potentially unnecessary biopsies. This study explores whether integrating PSA-based biomarkers and clinical parameters can improve risk assessment and minimize avoidable interventions in a Taiwanese cohort.
Materials and Methods
Detailed medical records of 165 patients who underwent mpMRI and MRI-ultrasound fusion-guided biopsy between April 2021 and August 2024 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients were stratified into PI-RADS 3-4 and PI-RADS 5 groups. csPCa was defined as an ISUP grade ≥2. Logistic regression models were used to identify predictors of csPCa. The diagnostic performance of PI-RADS alone and in combination with PSA density (PSAD) and PSA velocity (PSAV) was assessed using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA).
Results
csPCa was detected in 30.8% of PI-RADS 3-4 lesions. PSAD ≥0.20 ng/mL/mL was an independent predictor of csPCa (OR: 12.167, p = 0.042). In the overall cohort, the combination of PI-RADS 3-4 with PSAD ≥0.20 ng/mL/mL and PSAV ≥0.75 ng/mL/year improved diagnostic accuracy (AUC: 0.624) compared to PI-RADS alone. In the PI-RADS 3-4 subgroup, the combined model achieved an AUC of 0.673. DCA demonstrated that this combined model provided the highest net benefit within a threshold probability range of 25%-50%, reducing unnecessary biopsies by approximately 40%. In the PI-RADS 3-4 subgroup, the combination model also yielded the greatest net benefit within the threshold range of 18%-50%.
Conclusions
Integrating PSAD and PSAV improves risk stratification in PI-RADS 3-4 lesions, offering a practical approach to optimize biopsy decision-making and minimize unnecessary procedures. DCA findings support the clinical utility of this model in identifying patients who may safely defer biopsy while maintaining high detection rates of csPCa.
Keywords
Prostatic Neoplasms, Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Prostate-Specific Antigen, Biopsy, Risk Assessment
Figure 1
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/faf7e7647fa8d550aa6505b9afd9034e.png
Figure 1 Caption
Clinical Characteristics of the Study Population Stratified by PI-RADS Scores
Figure 2
https://storage.unitedwebnetwork.com/files/1237/88b91e7adff3f780e0244dca346babed.png
Figure 2 Caption
Decision curve analysis illustrating the net benefit of different predictive models for diagnosing csPCa in (A) the total cohort and (B) patients with PI-RADS 3-4
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
1663
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(07): Oncology Prostate (B)
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
14:00 -14:06
Presentation Order
6