Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
 
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
 
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
 
Submitted
Abstract
Comparative Analysis of Treatment Effectiveness for Giggle Incontinence in Boys and Girls
Podium Abstract
Clinical Research
Pediatric Urology
Author's Information
1
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Iran
Farshad Banouei farshadbanouei90@gmail.com Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Hamedan university of Medical sciences Urology and Nephrology research center Hamedan Iran *
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Abstract Content
Giggle incontinence is a form of urinary incontinence triggered by laughter, predominantly affecting children. This condition can significantly impact social and emotional well-being. Understanding the effectiveness of various treatment modalities is essential for optimal management.To compare the efficacy of medical and non-medical treatments for giggle incontinence in a cohort of 14 children, examining differences in outcomes between girls and boys.
A case series of 14 patients diagnosed with giggle incontinence was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving medical treatment (e.g., anticholinergics, desmopressin) and those undergoing non-medical interventions (e.g., bladder training, pelvic floor exercises). Treatment outcomes were assessed based on frequency of episodes, patient-reported quality of life, and parental satisfaction.
Medical Treatment: Among the 7 patients receiving medical therapy, a 50% reduction in episode frequency was observed in 4 cases, with significant improvement in quality of life reported by parents.Non-Medical Treatment: The 7 patients undergoing non-medical interventions experienced a 70% reduction in episodes, with higher parental satisfaction noted. Gender Comparison: Girls showed a slightly higher response rate to non-medical treatments, while boys benefited more from medical therapies, though results were not statistically significant.
Both medical and non-medical treatments are effective in managing giggle incontinence, with non-medical approaches showing slightly superior outcomes in this small cohort. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and explore gender-specific responses to treatment.
Giggle incontinence, medical treatment, non-medical treatment, pediatric urology, gender differences.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
0
 
Presentation Details
Free Paper Podium(11): Pediatric Urology
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
15:48 - 15:54
4