Home
Abstract
My Abstract(s)
Login
ePosters
Back
Final Presentation Format
Podium Abstract
Eposter Presentation
Eposter in PDF Format
Accept format: PDF. The file size should not be more than 5MB
Eposter in Image Format
Accept format: PNG/JPG/WEBP. The file size should not be more than 2MB
Presentation Date / Time
Submission Status
Submitted
Abstract
Abstract Title
Comparative Analysis of Treatment Effectiveness for Giggle Incontinence in Boys and Girls
Presentation Type
Podium Abstract
Manuscript Type
Clinical Research
Abstract Category *
Pediatric Urology
Author's Information
Number of Authors (including submitting/presenting author) *
1
No more than 10 authors can be listed (as per the Good Publication Practice (GPP) Guidelines).
Please ensure the authors are listed in the right order.
Country
Iran
Co-author 1
Farshad Banouei farshadbanouei90@gmail.com Urology and Nephrology Research Center, Hamedan university of Medical sciences Urology and Nephrology research center Hamedan Iran *
Co-author 2
Co-author 3
Co-author 4
Co-author 5
Co-author 6
Co-author 7
Co-author 8
Co-author 9
Co-author 10
Co-author 11
Co-author 12
Co-author 13
Co-author 14
Co-author 15
Co-author 16
Co-author 17
Co-author 18
Co-author 19
Co-author 20
Abstract Content
Introduction
Giggle incontinence is a form of urinary incontinence triggered by laughter, predominantly affecting children. This condition can significantly impact social and emotional well-being. Understanding the effectiveness of various treatment modalities is essential for optimal management.To compare the efficacy of medical and non-medical treatments for giggle incontinence in a cohort of 14 children, examining differences in outcomes between girls and boys.
Materials and Methods
A case series of 14 patients diagnosed with giggle incontinence was analyzed. Patients were divided into two groups: those receiving medical treatment (e.g., anticholinergics, desmopressin) and those undergoing non-medical interventions (e.g., bladder training, pelvic floor exercises). Treatment outcomes were assessed based on frequency of episodes, patient-reported quality of life, and parental satisfaction.
Results
Medical Treatment: Among the 7 patients receiving medical therapy, a 50% reduction in episode frequency was observed in 4 cases, with significant improvement in quality of life reported by parents.Non-Medical Treatment: The 7 patients undergoing non-medical interventions experienced a 70% reduction in episodes, with higher parental satisfaction noted. Gender Comparison: Girls showed a slightly higher response rate to non-medical treatments, while boys benefited more from medical therapies, though results were not statistically significant.
Conclusions
Both medical and non-medical treatments are effective in managing giggle incontinence, with non-medical approaches showing slightly superior outcomes in this small cohort. Further studies with larger sample sizes are needed to validate these findings and explore gender-specific responses to treatment.
Keywords
Giggle incontinence, medical treatment, non-medical treatment, pediatric urology, gender differences.
Figure 1
Figure 1 Caption
Figure 2
Figure 2 Caption
Figure 3
Figure 3 Caption
Figure 4
Figure 4 Caption
Figure 5
Figure 5 Caption
Character Count
0
Vimeo Link
Presentation Details
Session
Free Paper Podium(11): Pediatric Urology
Date
Aug. 15 (Fri.)
Time
15:48 - 15:54
Presentation Order
4